[Efforts to improve workplaces considering for older workers: A questionnaire survey focusing on company size in Wakayama Prefecture, Japan].

Ikuharu Morioka, Tatsuya Takeshita, Kazuhisa Miyashita, Akira Fujiyoshi, Zentaro Ikuta
{"title":"[Efforts to improve workplaces considering for older workers: A questionnaire survey focusing on company size in Wakayama Prefecture, Japan].","authors":"Ikuharu Morioka, Tatsuya Takeshita, Kazuhisa Miyashita, Akira Fujiyoshi, Zentaro Ikuta","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2023-002-E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The \"Guidelines for Ensuring the Safety and Health of Older Workers (hereafter referred to as \"Guidelines\"),\" formulated in 2021, require employers to implement measures that proactively prevent occupational accidents among older workers. This study aimed to clarify the status of awareness of the Guidelines and workplace improvement efforts with consideration of older workers, focusing on company size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Overall, 780 businesses in Wakayama Prefecture, Japan, were randomly selected from a Wakayama Occupational Health Support Center workplace list. Anonymous self-administered questionnaires were distributed by mail. The questionnaires comprised questions about the workplace, status of awareness of the Guidelines, comprehensive management of safety and health, considerations for working conditions, workers, workload reduction, work posture, work environment, and safety and health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and seventy-one businesses (effective response rate: 21.9%) provided questionnaires with complete responses. For the Guidelines, 39.0% of small-sized (less than 50 employees) businesses answered, \"never even heard of the name,\" while many medium-sized (50-99 employees) and large-sized (100 or more employees) businesses answered that they had heard of the name but did not exactly know about it (33.3% of medium-sized businesses and 47.8% of large-sized businesses). Regarding the system that subsidizes the expenses required for the improvement of a working environment for older workers to work safely and securely (hereinafter referred to as the subsidy system), many businesses of all sizes answered that they had \"never even heard of the name.\" In the comprehensive management of safety and health, half of the businesses of all sizes had developed a system that made it easy to consult about the risk against occupational accidents of older workers. Regardless of size, more than half of businesses were able to consider working conditions and workers. However, there were only a few items where more than half of the businesses considered workload reduction, work posture, work environment, and safety and health, regardless of business size. It became clear that workplace improvement had not progressed very much.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that to promote workplace improvement that considers older workers, it is necessary to disseminate the Guidelines and proactively take on workplace improvement by utilizing the subsidy system.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":" ","pages":"355-365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2023-002-E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The "Guidelines for Ensuring the Safety and Health of Older Workers (hereafter referred to as "Guidelines")," formulated in 2021, require employers to implement measures that proactively prevent occupational accidents among older workers. This study aimed to clarify the status of awareness of the Guidelines and workplace improvement efforts with consideration of older workers, focusing on company size.

Methods: Overall, 780 businesses in Wakayama Prefecture, Japan, were randomly selected from a Wakayama Occupational Health Support Center workplace list. Anonymous self-administered questionnaires were distributed by mail. The questionnaires comprised questions about the workplace, status of awareness of the Guidelines, comprehensive management of safety and health, considerations for working conditions, workers, workload reduction, work posture, work environment, and safety and health.

Results: One hundred and seventy-one businesses (effective response rate: 21.9%) provided questionnaires with complete responses. For the Guidelines, 39.0% of small-sized (less than 50 employees) businesses answered, "never even heard of the name," while many medium-sized (50-99 employees) and large-sized (100 or more employees) businesses answered that they had heard of the name but did not exactly know about it (33.3% of medium-sized businesses and 47.8% of large-sized businesses). Regarding the system that subsidizes the expenses required for the improvement of a working environment for older workers to work safely and securely (hereinafter referred to as the subsidy system), many businesses of all sizes answered that they had "never even heard of the name." In the comprehensive management of safety and health, half of the businesses of all sizes had developed a system that made it easy to consult about the risk against occupational accidents of older workers. Regardless of size, more than half of businesses were able to consider working conditions and workers. However, there were only a few items where more than half of the businesses considered workload reduction, work posture, work environment, and safety and health, regardless of business size. It became clear that workplace improvement had not progressed very much.

Conclusions: These results suggest that to promote workplace improvement that considers older workers, it is necessary to disseminate the Guidelines and proactively take on workplace improvement by utilizing the subsidy system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[努力改善工作场所,考虑老年员工:日本和歌山县一项针对公司规模的问卷调查]。
目标:2021年制定的《确保老年工人安全和健康准则》(以下简称《准则》)要求雇主采取措施,主动预防老年工人发生职业事故。本研究旨在澄清对准则的认识状况,并考虑到老年员工的工作场所改善努力,重点关注公司规模。方法:总体而言,从和歌山职业健康支持中心的工作场所名单中随机选择了日本和歌山县的780家企业。匿名自行填写的问卷通过邮件分发。调查表的问题包括工作场所、对《准则》的认识状况、安全和健康的综合管理、对工作条件的考虑、工人、工作量减少、工作姿势、工作环境以及安全和健康。结果:171家企业提供了完整的问卷,有效回复率为21.9%。对于《指导方针》,39.0%的中小企业(50人以下)回答“从来没有听说过”,而中型企业(50 ~ 99人)和大型企业(100人以上)回答“虽然听说过,但不太清楚”的企业较多(33.3%的中小企业和47.8%的大企业)。对于为老年人安全工作而对改善工作环境所需费用进行补贴的制度(以下简称补贴制度),许多大小企业回答说:“连这个名字都没听说过。”在安全与健康的综合管理方面,一半的各种规模的企业建立了一个系统,便于咨询老年工人的职业事故风险。无论规模大小,超过一半的企业能够考虑工作条件和员工。但是,半数以上的企业不论规模大小,都考虑减少工作量、工作姿势、工作环境、安全和健康等问题。很明显,工作场所的改善并没有取得太大进展。结论:这些结果表明,为了促进考虑到老年员工的工作场所改善,有必要宣传《指导意见》,并利用补贴制度积极承担工作场所改善工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
[Selecting measurement subject workers for evaluation using a personal sampling method: a case involving analytical chemistry experiments at a university laboratory]. [The past and future of occupational health nursing research in Japan]. [Association between mental health, fear of COVID-19, and job insecurity among bus service workers during the COVID-19 pandemic]. [Convenient health initiatives to help small- and medium-sized enterprises with mental health, lifestyle-related diseases, and hazardous work]. [Development and validation of the University of Tokyo Occupational Mental Health leadership checklist among occupational health specialists].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1