The Role of Information and Nudges on Advance Directives and End-of-Life Planning: Evidence From a Randomized Trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Care Research and Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/10775587231157800
Nianyi Hong, Allyson Root, Benjamin Handel
{"title":"The Role of Information and Nudges on Advance Directives and End-of-Life Planning: Evidence From a Randomized Trial.","authors":"Nianyi Hong, Allyson Root, Benjamin Handel","doi":"10.1177/10775587231157800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the substantial personal and economic implications of end-of-life decisions, many individuals fail to document their wishes, which often leads to patient dissatisfaction and unnecessary medical spending. We conducted a randomized trial of 1,200 patients aged 55 years and older to facilitate advance directive (AD) completion and better understand why patients fail to engage in high-value planning. We found that including a physical AD form with paper letters as a nudge to decrease hassle costs increased AD completion by 9.0 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] = [4.2, 13.9] percentage points). The intervention was especially effective for individuals aged 70 years and older, as AD completion increased by 17.5 percentage points (95% CI = [5.7, 9.4] percentage points). When compared with the impact of costless electronic reminders, each additional AD completion from the letter interventions costs as little as US$37. Our findings suggest that simple, inexpensive interventions with paper communication as behavioral nudges can be effective, especially in older populations.","PeriodicalId":51127,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care Research and Review","volume":"80 3","pages":"283-292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587231157800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the substantial personal and economic implications of end-of-life decisions, many individuals fail to document their wishes, which often leads to patient dissatisfaction and unnecessary medical spending. We conducted a randomized trial of 1,200 patients aged 55 years and older to facilitate advance directive (AD) completion and better understand why patients fail to engage in high-value planning. We found that including a physical AD form with paper letters as a nudge to decrease hassle costs increased AD completion by 9.0 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] = [4.2, 13.9] percentage points). The intervention was especially effective for individuals aged 70 years and older, as AD completion increased by 17.5 percentage points (95% CI = [5.7, 9.4] percentage points). When compared with the impact of costless electronic reminders, each additional AD completion from the letter interventions costs as little as US$37. Our findings suggest that simple, inexpensive interventions with paper communication as behavioral nudges can be effective, especially in older populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息和推动在预先指示和临终计划中的作用:来自随机试验的证据。
尽管临终决定对个人和经济都有重大影响,但许多人没有记录他们的愿望,这往往导致患者不满和不必要的医疗支出。我们对1200名年龄在55岁及以上的患者进行了一项随机试验,以促进提前指示(AD)的完成,并更好地了解患者无法参与高价值计划的原因。我们发现,将带有纸质信件的实体广告表单作为减少麻烦成本的推动因素,可使广告完成度提高9.0个百分点(95%置信区间[CI] =[4.2, 13.9]个百分点)。干预对70岁及以上的个体尤其有效,AD完成率提高了17.5个百分点(95% CI =[5.7, 9.4]个百分点)。与无成本电子提醒的影响相比,信件干预每增加一次广告完成的成本仅为37美元。我们的研究结果表明,简单、廉价的干预措施,以书面交流作为行为推动是有效的,尤其是在老年人中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Care Research and Review
Medical Care Research and Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Care Research and Review (MCRR) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal containing critical reviews of literature on organizational structure, economics, and the financing of health and medical care systems. MCRR also includes original empirical and theoretical research and trends to enable policy makers to make informed decisions, as well as to identify health care trends. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 25 days
期刊最新文献
Policy and Payment Decisions on Peritoneal Dialysis in the United States: A Review. Association Between Self-Direction and Personal Care Aide Wages. Program Implementation Strategies Associated With Reduced Acute Care Utilization for Medicaid Beneficiaries in California's Whole Person Care Pilot Program. Health Care Use of ACA Marketplace Enrollees During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Changes in Patient Care Experiences and the Nurse Work Environment: A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Hospitals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1