What is the potential of compensation funds for addressing COVID-related personal injury?

Jonas Knetsch, Kim Watts
{"title":"What is the potential of compensation funds for addressing COVID-related personal injury?","authors":"Jonas Knetsch,&nbsp;Kim Watts","doi":"10.1057/s41288-023-00292-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic continues to present new challenges at the frontiers of social risk. Its significant societal impact has prompted the consideration of alternative frameworks like compensation funds to better allocate the risks and impacts of COVID-related injury. Although there has been discussion about the potential of alternative liability structures for vaccine-related injury, there has been less analysis of the right way to compensate other types of injury, such as long-term illness, disability and death, associated with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In France, a universal compensation fund for COVID-19-related injuries, designed similarly to asbestos-related schemes, was considered by the parliament. With an eye on scientific knowledge of the best practice in the development and operation of compensation frameworks, this paper analyses the design of such funds in Europe as applied to COVID-19 injury and considers the position of compensation funds in relation to tort law, private insurance and social security models.</p>","PeriodicalId":75009,"journal":{"name":"The Geneva papers on risk and insurance. Issues and practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970113/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Geneva papers on risk and insurance. Issues and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41288-023-00292-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to present new challenges at the frontiers of social risk. Its significant societal impact has prompted the consideration of alternative frameworks like compensation funds to better allocate the risks and impacts of COVID-related injury. Although there has been discussion about the potential of alternative liability structures for vaccine-related injury, there has been less analysis of the right way to compensate other types of injury, such as long-term illness, disability and death, associated with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In France, a universal compensation fund for COVID-19-related injuries, designed similarly to asbestos-related schemes, was considered by the parliament. With an eye on scientific knowledge of the best practice in the development and operation of compensation frameworks, this paper analyses the design of such funds in Europe as applied to COVID-19 injury and considers the position of compensation funds in relation to tort law, private insurance and social security models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赔偿基金在解决新冠肺炎相关人身伤害方面的潜力有多大?
新冠肺炎大流行继续在社会风险的前沿提出新的挑战。其重大的社会影响促使人们考虑其他框架,如补偿基金,以更好地分配新冠肺炎相关伤害的风险和影响。尽管已经讨论了疫苗相关伤害的替代责任结构的可能性,但对补偿与严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型病毒相关的其他类型伤害(如长期疾病、残疾和死亡)的正确方式的分析较少。在法国,议会审议了一项针对新冠肺炎相关伤害的普遍赔偿基金,该基金的设计与石棉相关计划类似。本文着眼于对赔偿框架制定和运作的最佳实践的科学知识,分析了欧洲适用于新冠肺炎伤害的此类基金的设计,并考虑了赔偿基金在侵权法、私人保险和社会保障模式方面的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microinsurance research: status quo and future research directions Investment in big data analytics and loss reserve accuracy: evidence from the U.S. property-liability insurance industry Actuarial premium calculation for beekeeping insurance in Turkiye Discretionary decisions in capital requirements under Solvency II Technology investment and insurer efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1