Relations Between Stress-Adapted Communication Skills and Toxic Social Networks Among Young Adults with Childhood Adversity

Samantha M. Brown, Meara H. Faw, Rachel G. Lucas-Thompson, Jessica Pettigrew, Kelley Quirk
{"title":"Relations Between Stress-Adapted Communication Skills and Toxic Social Networks Among Young Adults with Childhood Adversity","authors":"Samantha M. Brown,&nbsp;Meara H. Faw,&nbsp;Rachel G. Lucas-Thompson,&nbsp;Jessica Pettigrew,&nbsp;Kelley Quirk","doi":"10.1007/s42844-023-00093-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>Adverse childhood experiences are associated with deleterious outcomes across the lifespan. However, some individuals who grow up in adverse environments may develop stress-adapted skills or resilience factors that enable them to function in their current lived environments. This study explored whether communication is a stress-adapted skill among young adults with co-occurring forms of childhood adversity and the extent to which these communication skills are implicated in toxic social networks. This cross-sectional study included 384 young adults, ages 18–35 years, who completed an online survey. Mixture modeling was used to conduct latent class models estimating subgroups of young adults with co-occurring forms of early adversity; then, regression models estimated the association between communication skills and toxic social networks among subgroups. Four latent classes were identified: (1) high childhood adversity; (2) high to moderate household dysfunction and emotional abuse; (3) high emotional abuse and moderate physical abuse and emotional neglect; and (4) low or no childhood adversity. Results from regression models indicate that participants classified in the high emotional abuse and moderate physical abuse and emotional neglect class had more adaptive communication skills with friends than their counterparts in the low or no childhood adversity class, and participants in the high childhood adversity or low or no childhood adversity classes with higher communication skills were less likely to report toxic social networks. Findings suggest that stress-adapted communication skills may be one resilience factor that supports adaptation among young adults with early adversity exposures.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":72113,"journal":{"name":"Adversity and resilience science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42844-023-00093-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adversity and resilience science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42844-023-00093-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract

Adverse childhood experiences are associated with deleterious outcomes across the lifespan. However, some individuals who grow up in adverse environments may develop stress-adapted skills or resilience factors that enable them to function in their current lived environments. This study explored whether communication is a stress-adapted skill among young adults with co-occurring forms of childhood adversity and the extent to which these communication skills are implicated in toxic social networks. This cross-sectional study included 384 young adults, ages 18–35 years, who completed an online survey. Mixture modeling was used to conduct latent class models estimating subgroups of young adults with co-occurring forms of early adversity; then, regression models estimated the association between communication skills and toxic social networks among subgroups. Four latent classes were identified: (1) high childhood adversity; (2) high to moderate household dysfunction and emotional abuse; (3) high emotional abuse and moderate physical abuse and emotional neglect; and (4) low or no childhood adversity. Results from regression models indicate that participants classified in the high emotional abuse and moderate physical abuse and emotional neglect class had more adaptive communication skills with friends than their counterparts in the low or no childhood adversity class, and participants in the high childhood adversity or low or no childhood adversity classes with higher communication skills were less likely to report toxic social networks. Findings suggest that stress-adapted communication skills may be one resilience factor that supports adaptation among young adults with early adversity exposures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在有童年逆境的年轻人中,适应压力的沟通技巧与有毒社交网络之间的关系。
不良的童年经历与整个生命周期的有害结果有关。然而,一些在不利环境中长大的人可能会发展出适应压力的技能或恢复力因素,使他们能够在当前的生活环境中发挥作用。这项研究探讨了在有共同发生的童年逆境的年轻人中,沟通是否是一种适应压力的技能,以及这些沟通技能在多大程度上与有毒的社交网络有关。这项横断面研究包括384名18-35岁的年轻人,他们完成了一项在线调查。混合建模用于进行潜在类别模型,估计具有共同发生形式的早期逆境的年轻人的亚组;然后,回归模型估计了沟通技能与亚组之间有毒社交网络之间的关联。确定了四个潜在的类别:(1)童年时期的高逆境;(2) 高至中度家庭功能障碍和情感虐待;(3) 高度情感虐待和中度身体虐待和情感忽视;以及(4)儿童时期的逆境很少或没有。回归模型的结果表明,被分为高情绪虐待、中度身体虐待和情绪忽视班的参与者比低或无童年逆境班的参与者更具有与朋友的适应性沟通技能,在高童年逆境或低或无童年逆境班中,具有较高沟通技能的参与者报告有毒社交网络的可能性较小。研究结果表明,适应压力的沟通技能可能是支持早期暴露于逆境的年轻人适应的一个恢复因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Finding Silver Linings: Benefit-Finding, Stress, and Depressive Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic Psychological Resilience Mediates the Relationship Between BCE’s and Life Satisfaction: Examining Turkish Students Intersection of Adverse Childhood Experiences, Subjective Well-Being and Social Anxiety among Sojourners in China The Interplay Between Female Caregiver Proactive Coping, Stress, and Adaptive Caregiver Personality on Early Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Moderated-Mediation Model Self-Care Mediates Current Adverse Experiences and Depressive Symptoms Among Emerging Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1