Exploring Persistent Racial and Ethnic Representation Disparity in U.S. Geography Doctoral Programs: The Disciplinary Underrepresentation Gap.

Abstract

Underrepresentation among U.S. citizen racial and ethnic minorities in geography has a long history, one perpetuated through-and readily measurable by-its doctoral degree-granting record. This article examines the history of efforts to redress underrepresentation since the 1960s, explores modern underrepresentation, measures the degree of its persistence in the discipline and within individual departments, and identifies drivers that exacerbate the racial and ethnic representation disparity among U.S. citizens in geography doctoral programs. To quantify the degree to which the discipline is underperforming demographically, we contrasted the rate of domestic underrepresented minority doctoral degree conferrals with those of White doctoral recipients in geography, the social sciences, and the entire academy over a twenty-three-year period from 1997 through 2019. During that span, geography consistently trailed the social sciences and the academy: This underrepresentation gap has widened in the past decade. Four drivers were identified: (1) lack of dedicated funding for underrepresented minority doctoral students, (2) minimal prior exposure to academic and professional geography, (3) passive recruitment strategies, and (4) pervasive Whiteness of departments. We conclude with a call to action for geographers to meet the moral imperative of racial and ethnic representational equity by becoming agents of measurable change.