ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XXI: PGT analyses in 2018.

IF 8.3 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human reproduction open Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1093/hropen/hoad010
F Spinella, F Bronet, F Carvalho, E Coonen, M De Rycke, C Rubio, V Goossens, A Van Montfoort
{"title":"ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XXI: PGT analyses in 2018.","authors":"F Spinella,&nbsp;F Bronet,&nbsp;F Carvalho,&nbsp;E Coonen,&nbsp;M De Rycke,&nbsp;C Rubio,&nbsp;V Goossens,&nbsp;A Van Montfoort","doi":"10.1093/hropen/hoad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>What are the trends and developments in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in 2018 as compared to previous years?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>The main trends observed in this 21st dataset on PGT are that the implementation of trophectoderm biopsy with comprehensive whole-genome testing is most often applied for PGT-A and concurrent PGT-M/SR/A, while for PGT-M and PGT-SR, single-cell testing with PCR and FISH still prevail.</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGT Consortium has been collecting and analysing data from mainly European PGT centres. To date, 20 datasets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections have been published.</p><p><strong>Study design size duration: </strong>The data for PGT analyses performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 with a 2-year follow-up after analysis were provided by participating centres on a voluntary basis. Data were collected using an online platform, which is based on genetic analysis and has been in use since 2016.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials setting methods: </strong>Data on biopsy method, diagnostic technology, and clinical outcome were submitted by 44 centres. Records with analyses for more than one PGT for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and/or PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR), or with inconsistent data regarding the PGT modality, were excluded. All transfers performed within 2 years after the analysis were included, enabling the calculation of cumulative pregnancy rates. Data analysis, calculations, and preparation of figures and tables were carried out by expert co-authors.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>The current data collection from 2018 covers a total of 1388 analyses for PGT-M, 462 analyses for PGT-SR, 3003 analyses for PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A), and 338 analyses for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A.The application of blastocyst biopsy is gradually rising for PGT-M (from 19% in 2016-2017 to 33% in 2018), is status quo for PGT-SR (from 30% in 2016-2017 to 33% in 2018) and has become the most used biopsy stage for PGT-A (from 87% in 2016-2017 to 98% in 2018) and for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A (96%). The use of comprehensive, whole-genome amplification (WGA)-based diagnostic technology showed a small decrease for PGT-M (from 15% in 2016-2017 to 12% in 2018) and for PGT-SR (from 50% in 2016-2017 to 44% in 2018). Comprehensive testing was, however, the main technology for PGT-A (from 93% in 2016-2017 to 98% in 2018). WGA-based testing was also widely used for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A, as a standalone technique (74%) or in combination with PCR or FISH (24%). Trophectoderm biopsy and comprehensive testing strategies are linked with higher diagnostic efficiencies and improved clinical outcomes per embryo transfer.</p><p><strong>Limitations reasons for caution: </strong>The findings apply to the data submitted by 44 participating centres and do not represent worldwide trends in PGT. Details on the health of babies born were not provided in this manuscript.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>The Consortium datasets provide a valuable resource for following trends in PGT practice.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interests: </strong>The study has no external funding, and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests declared.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":73264,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction open","volume":"2023 2","pages":"hoad010"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/fb/hoad010.PMC10121336.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoad010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Study question: What are the trends and developments in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in 2018 as compared to previous years?

Summary answer: The main trends observed in this 21st dataset on PGT are that the implementation of trophectoderm biopsy with comprehensive whole-genome testing is most often applied for PGT-A and concurrent PGT-M/SR/A, while for PGT-M and PGT-SR, single-cell testing with PCR and FISH still prevail.

What is known already: Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGT Consortium has been collecting and analysing data from mainly European PGT centres. To date, 20 datasets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections have been published.

Study design size duration: The data for PGT analyses performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018 with a 2-year follow-up after analysis were provided by participating centres on a voluntary basis. Data were collected using an online platform, which is based on genetic analysis and has been in use since 2016.

Participants/materials setting methods: Data on biopsy method, diagnostic technology, and clinical outcome were submitted by 44 centres. Records with analyses for more than one PGT for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and/or PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR), or with inconsistent data regarding the PGT modality, were excluded. All transfers performed within 2 years after the analysis were included, enabling the calculation of cumulative pregnancy rates. Data analysis, calculations, and preparation of figures and tables were carried out by expert co-authors.

Main results and the role of chance: The current data collection from 2018 covers a total of 1388 analyses for PGT-M, 462 analyses for PGT-SR, 3003 analyses for PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A), and 338 analyses for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A.The application of blastocyst biopsy is gradually rising for PGT-M (from 19% in 2016-2017 to 33% in 2018), is status quo for PGT-SR (from 30% in 2016-2017 to 33% in 2018) and has become the most used biopsy stage for PGT-A (from 87% in 2016-2017 to 98% in 2018) and for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A (96%). The use of comprehensive, whole-genome amplification (WGA)-based diagnostic technology showed a small decrease for PGT-M (from 15% in 2016-2017 to 12% in 2018) and for PGT-SR (from 50% in 2016-2017 to 44% in 2018). Comprehensive testing was, however, the main technology for PGT-A (from 93% in 2016-2017 to 98% in 2018). WGA-based testing was also widely used for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A, as a standalone technique (74%) or in combination with PCR or FISH (24%). Trophectoderm biopsy and comprehensive testing strategies are linked with higher diagnostic efficiencies and improved clinical outcomes per embryo transfer.

Limitations reasons for caution: The findings apply to the data submitted by 44 participating centres and do not represent worldwide trends in PGT. Details on the health of babies born were not provided in this manuscript.

Wider implications of the findings: The Consortium datasets provide a valuable resource for following trends in PGT practice.

Study funding/competing interests: The study has no external funding, and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests declared.

Trial registration number: N/A.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESHRE PGT联合会数据收集XXI:2018年的PGT分析。
研究问题:与往年相比,2018年胚胎植入前基因检测(PGT)的趋势和发展是什么?总结:在第21个PGT数据集中观察到的主要趋势是,对PGT-A和同时进行的PGT- m /SR/A进行营养外胚层活检最常应用于PGT-A和PGT- m /SR/A,而对于PGT- m和PGT-SR,单细胞PCR和FISH检测仍然盛行。已知情况:自1997年成立以来,ESHRE PGT联盟一直在收集和分析主要来自欧洲PGT中心的数据。迄今为止,已发布了20个数据集和前10年数据收集的概述。研究设计规模持续时间:2018年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间进行的PGT分析数据,分析后随访2年,由参与中心自愿提供。数据是通过一个基于基因分析的在线平台收集的,该平台自2016年以来一直在使用。参与者/材料设置方法:44个中心提交了活检方法、诊断技术和临床结果的数据。单基因疾病(PGT- m)和/或染色体结构重排(PGT- sr)的PGT多于一项,或PGT模式数据不一致的记录被排除在外。所有在分析后2年内进行的移植都包括在内,从而可以计算累积妊娠率。数据分析、计算以及图表和表格的准备由专家共同作者进行。主要结果和偶然性的作用:2018年目前收集的数据共包括PGT- m分析1388项,PGT-SR分析462项,PGT非整倍体(PGT- a)分析3003项,PGT- m /SR与PGT- a并发分析338项。囊胚活检在PGT-M中的应用逐渐增加(从2016-2017年的19%增加到2018年的33%),在PGT-SR中的应用也是如此(从2016-2017年的30%增加到2018年的33%),并已成为PGT-A(从2016-2017年的87%增加到2018年的98%)和PGT-M/SR与PGT-A同时使用的活检阶段(96%)。使用基于全基因组扩增(WGA)的综合诊断技术显示,PGT-M(从2016-2017年的15%降至2018年的12%)和PGT-SR(从2016-2017年的50%降至2018年的44%)的比例略有下降。然而,综合检测是PGT-A的主要技术(从2016-2017年的93%上升到2018年的98%)。基于wga的检测也广泛用于与PGT-A同时进行的PGT-M/SR,作为单独技术(74%)或与PCR或FISH结合(24%)。滋养外胚层活检和综合检测策略与每次胚胎移植更高的诊断效率和改善的临床结果有关。注意的局限性:研究结果适用于44个参与中心提交的数据,并不代表PGT的全球趋势。这份手稿中没有提供出生婴儿健康的细节。研究结果的更广泛意义:联盟数据集为跟踪PGT实践的趋势提供了宝贵的资源。研究经费/竞争利益:该研究没有外部资金,所有费用由ESHRE承担。没有任何相互竞争的利益。试验注册号:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Birth defects reporting and the use of dydrogesterone: a disproportionality analysis from the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase). The interplay between mitochondrial DNA genotypes, female infertility, ovarian response, and mutagenesis in oocytes. Unmasking the risk: clinical trials versus real-world evidence on dydrogesterone and birth defects. Evidence-based guideline: premature ovarian insufficiency. Independent factors associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in patients with complete azoospermia factor c microdeletions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1