Social vulnerability, social-ecological resilience and coastal governance.

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Global Sustainability Pub Date : 2022-05-02 DOI:10.1017/sus.2022.10
Javad Jozaei, Wen-Ching Chuang, Craig R Allen, Ahjond Garmestani
{"title":"Social vulnerability, social-ecological resilience and coastal governance.","authors":"Javad Jozaei,&nbsp;Wen-Ching Chuang,&nbsp;Craig R Allen,&nbsp;Ahjond Garmestani","doi":"10.1017/sus.2022.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Non-technical summary: </strong>Our analysis shows that the framing of social vulnerability is shaped by a narrow definition of resilience, focusing on post-disaster return and recovery responses. This perspective does not account for the dynamism and non-stationarity of social-ecological systems (SES) which is becoming increasingly important in the face of accelerating environmental change. Incorporating social-ecological resilience into social vulnerability analysis can improve coastal governance by accounting for adaptation and transformation, as well as scale and cross-scale interactions.</p><p><strong>Technical summary: </strong>Social vulnerability analysis has been unable to deliver outcomes that reflect the reality of vulnerability and its consequences in an era characterised by accelerating environmental change. In this work, we used critical discourse analysis and key informant interviews to understand different framings of social vulnerability in coastal governance and management, globally and in New Zealand. We found that the framing of system vulnerability could vary depending on the definition of resilience adopted, which has critical ramifications for coastal governance of linked systems of humans and nature. We found that the framing of social vulnerability in coastal governance is mainly influenced by engineering, community and disaster resilience, focusing on return and recovery governance responses to environmental change (e.g. hurricanes, wildfires). Instead, we suggest a novel perspective based on social-ecological resilience, which more accurately reflects the dynamics of linked systems of humans and nature (SES). This revised perspective, <i>general vulnerability</i>, accounts for the dynamics of Earth's systems across various spatial and temporal scales in the face of accelerating environmental change. Accounting for social-ecological resilience and its core aspects (i.e. panarchy, adaptation <i>and</i> transformation) is essential for informing coastal governance of SES (Do we adapt? or Do we transform the SES?).</p><p><strong>Social media summary: </strong>Social-ecological resilience is essential for social vulnerability analysis in the face of accelerating environmental change.</p>","PeriodicalId":36849,"journal":{"name":"Global Sustainability","volume":"5 ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304588/pdf/nihms-1877567.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2022.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Non-technical summary: Our analysis shows that the framing of social vulnerability is shaped by a narrow definition of resilience, focusing on post-disaster return and recovery responses. This perspective does not account for the dynamism and non-stationarity of social-ecological systems (SES) which is becoming increasingly important in the face of accelerating environmental change. Incorporating social-ecological resilience into social vulnerability analysis can improve coastal governance by accounting for adaptation and transformation, as well as scale and cross-scale interactions.

Technical summary: Social vulnerability analysis has been unable to deliver outcomes that reflect the reality of vulnerability and its consequences in an era characterised by accelerating environmental change. In this work, we used critical discourse analysis and key informant interviews to understand different framings of social vulnerability in coastal governance and management, globally and in New Zealand. We found that the framing of system vulnerability could vary depending on the definition of resilience adopted, which has critical ramifications for coastal governance of linked systems of humans and nature. We found that the framing of social vulnerability in coastal governance is mainly influenced by engineering, community and disaster resilience, focusing on return and recovery governance responses to environmental change (e.g. hurricanes, wildfires). Instead, we suggest a novel perspective based on social-ecological resilience, which more accurately reflects the dynamics of linked systems of humans and nature (SES). This revised perspective, general vulnerability, accounts for the dynamics of Earth's systems across various spatial and temporal scales in the face of accelerating environmental change. Accounting for social-ecological resilience and its core aspects (i.e. panarchy, adaptation and transformation) is essential for informing coastal governance of SES (Do we adapt? or Do we transform the SES?).

Social media summary: Social-ecological resilience is essential for social vulnerability analysis in the face of accelerating environmental change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会脆弱性、社会生态复原力与沿海治理。
非技术总结:我们的分析表明,社会脆弱性的框架是由一个狭义的弹性定义塑造的,重点是灾后回归和恢复响应。这种观点没有考虑到社会生态系统的动态性和非平稳性,而面对加速的环境变化,社会生态系统正变得越来越重要。将社会生态弹性纳入社会脆弱性分析可以通过考虑适应和转型以及规模和跨规模的相互作用来改善沿海治理。技术摘要:在一个以环境加速变化为特征的时代,社会脆弱性分析无法提供反映脆弱性现实及其后果的结果。在这项工作中,我们使用批判性话语分析和关键信息提供者访谈来了解全球和新西兰沿海治理和管理中社会脆弱性的不同框架。我们发现,系统脆弱性的框架可能因所采用的弹性定义而异,这对人类和自然联系系统的沿海治理具有重要影响。研究发现,沿海治理中的社会脆弱性框架主要受工程、社区和灾害复原力的影响,重点关注对环境变化(如飓风、野火)的回归和恢复治理响应。相反,我们提出了一种基于社会生态弹性的新观点,它更准确地反映了人与自然联系系统(SES)的动态。这一修订后的观点,即一般脆弱性,解释了面对加速的环境变化,地球系统在不同时空尺度上的动态。考虑社会生态弹性及其核心方面(即层级制、适应和转型)对于为SES的沿海治理提供信息至关重要(我们适应吗?或者我们要改造SES吗?)摘要:面对加速的环境变化,社会生态弹性对于社会脆弱性分析至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Sustainability
Global Sustainability Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
19
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reassessing the need for carbon dioxide removal: moral implications of alternative climate target pathways Attitudes toward water resilience and potential for improvement Justice in benefitting from carbon removal Ten New Insights in Climate Science 2023/2024 From climate science to climate action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1