The utility of the 'Arable Weeds and Management in Europe' database: Challenges and opportunities of combining weed survey data at a European scale.

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Weed Research Pub Date : 2023-02-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-08 DOI:10.1111/wre.12562
Helen Metcalfe, Jana Bürger, Christoph von Redwitz, Alicia Cirujeda, Silvia Fogliatto, Denise F Dostatny, Bärbel Gerowitt, Michael Glemnitz, José L González-Andújar, Eva Hernández Plaza, Jordi Izquierdo, Michaela Kolářová, Jevgenija Ņečajeva, Sandrine Petit, Gyula Pinke, Matthias Schumacher, Lena Ulber, Francesco Vidotto, Guillaume Fried
{"title":"The utility of the 'Arable Weeds and Management in Europe' database: Challenges and opportunities of combining weed survey data at a European scale.","authors":"Helen Metcalfe, Jana Bürger, Christoph von Redwitz, Alicia Cirujeda, Silvia Fogliatto, Denise F Dostatny, Bärbel Gerowitt, Michael Glemnitz, José L González-Andújar, Eva Hernández Plaza, Jordi Izquierdo, Michaela Kolářová, Jevgenija Ņečajeva, Sandrine Petit, Gyula Pinke, Matthias Schumacher, Lena Ulber, Francesco Vidotto, Guillaume Fried","doi":"10.1111/wre.12562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the last 30 years, many studies have surveyed weed vegetation on arable land. The 'Arable Weeds and Management in Europe' (AWME) database is a collection of 36 of these surveys and the associated management data. Here, we review the challenges associated with combining disparate datasets and explore some of the opportunities for future research that present themselves thanks to the AWME database. We present three case studies repeating previously published national scale analyses with data from a larger spatial extent. The case studies, originally done in France, Germany and the UK, explore various aspects of weed ecology (community composition, management and environmental effects and within-field distributions) and use a range of statistical techniques (canonical correspondence analysis, redundancy analysis and generalised linear mixed models) to demonstrate the utility and versatility of the AWME database. We demonstrate that (i) the standardisation of abundance data to a common measure, before the analysis of the combined dataset, has little impact on the outcome of the analyses, (ii) the increased extent of environmental or management gradients allows for greater confidence in conclusions and (iii) the main conclusions of analyses done at different spatial scales remain consistent. These case studies demonstrate the utility of a Europe-wide weed survey database, for clarifying or extending results obtained from studies at smaller scales. This Europe-wide data collection offers many more opportunities for analysis that could not be addressed in smaller datasets; including questions about the effects of climate change, macro-ecological and biogeographical issues related to weed diversity as well as the dominance or rarity of specific weeds in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":23661,"journal":{"name":"Weed Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10108295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weed Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last 30 years, many studies have surveyed weed vegetation on arable land. The 'Arable Weeds and Management in Europe' (AWME) database is a collection of 36 of these surveys and the associated management data. Here, we review the challenges associated with combining disparate datasets and explore some of the opportunities for future research that present themselves thanks to the AWME database. We present three case studies repeating previously published national scale analyses with data from a larger spatial extent. The case studies, originally done in France, Germany and the UK, explore various aspects of weed ecology (community composition, management and environmental effects and within-field distributions) and use a range of statistical techniques (canonical correspondence analysis, redundancy analysis and generalised linear mixed models) to demonstrate the utility and versatility of the AWME database. We demonstrate that (i) the standardisation of abundance data to a common measure, before the analysis of the combined dataset, has little impact on the outcome of the analyses, (ii) the increased extent of environmental or management gradients allows for greater confidence in conclusions and (iii) the main conclusions of analyses done at different spatial scales remain consistent. These case studies demonstrate the utility of a Europe-wide weed survey database, for clarifying or extending results obtained from studies at smaller scales. This Europe-wide data collection offers many more opportunities for analysis that could not be addressed in smaller datasets; including questions about the effects of climate change, macro-ecological and biogeographical issues related to weed diversity as well as the dominance or rarity of specific weeds in Europe.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲耕地杂草与管理 "数据库的实用性:在欧洲范围内整合杂草调查数据的挑战与机遇。
过去 30 年来,许多研究都对耕地上的杂草植被进行了调查。欧洲耕地杂草与管理"(AWME)数据库收集了 36 项此类调查和相关管理数据。在此,我们回顾了与整合不同数据集相关的挑战,并探讨了 AWME 数据库为未来研究带来的一些机遇。我们介绍了三个案例研究,用更大空间范围的数据重复了之前发布的国家级分析。这些案例研究最初是在法国、德国和英国进行的,探讨了杂草生态学的各个方面(群落组成、管理和环境影响以及田间分布),并使用了一系列统计技术(典型对应分析、冗余分析和广义线性混合模型)来展示 AWME 数据库的实用性和多功能性。我们证明:(i) 在对综合数据集进行分析之前,将丰度数据标准化为一个通用指标对分析结果的影响很小;(ii) 环境或管理梯度范围的扩大使结论的可信度更高;(iii) 不同空间尺度的分析得出的主要结论保持一致。这些案例研究表明,全欧洲范围的杂草调查数据库对于澄清或扩展较小尺度研究的结果非常有用。这种全欧洲范围的数据收集为分析提供了更多机会,这些机会是较小数据集无法解决的;包括气候变化的影响、与杂草多样性有关的宏观生态和生物地理问题以及特定杂草在欧洲的优势或稀有性等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Weed Research
Weed Research 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Weed Research is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes topical and innovative papers on weed science, in the English language. Its aim is to publish the best weed science from around the globe and to be the journal of choice for weed science researchers. It is the official journal of the European Weed Research Society. Papers are taken on all aspects of weeds, defined as plants that impact adversely on economic, aesthetic or environmental aspects of any system. Topics include, amongst others, weed biology and control, herbicides, invasive plant species in all environments, population and spatial biology, modelling, genetics, biodiversity and parasitic plants. The journal welcomes submissions on work carried out in any part of the world.
期刊最新文献
Improved control of Taraxacum officinale with 2,4‐D in the field from ammonium sulphate additions Key management practices to reduce the risk of the occurrence of Rumex obtusifolius in productive grasslands Impact of dose and adjuvant on herbicidal efficacy of birch‐based pyrolysis liquid Influence of light, nutrients, and soil moisture on the growth and resource allocation of Arundo donax Variability structure and heritability of germination timing in Capsella bursa‐pastoris (L.) Medik. (Shepherd's purse)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1