All professions can benefit - a mixed-methods study on simulation-based teamwork training for operating room teams.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Advances in simulation (London, England) Pub Date : 2023-07-17 DOI:10.1186/s41077-023-00257-0
Cecilia Escher, Hans Rystedt, Johan Creutzfeldt, Lisbet Meurling, Leif Hedman, Li Felländer-Tsai, Ann Kjellin
{"title":"All professions can benefit - a mixed-methods study on simulation-based teamwork training for operating room teams.","authors":"Cecilia Escher,&nbsp;Hans Rystedt,&nbsp;Johan Creutzfeldt,&nbsp;Lisbet Meurling,&nbsp;Leif Hedman,&nbsp;Li Felländer-Tsai,&nbsp;Ann Kjellin","doi":"10.1186/s41077-023-00257-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Operating rooms have become more technically complex due to new advanced procedures, which has increased demands on teamwork in the operating room. In response, team training has been proposed to improve team performance, workplace culture, and patient safety. We developed and delivered a simulation-based team training course for entire professional surgical teams. This type of intervention has been proposed by researchers but has not been widely published. The aims of this intervention study were to examine participants' reactions to the course in terms of their motivation for the training and their self-efficacy in relation to their performance, as well as their views on transferring the lessons learned in the course to their workplace.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective mixed-methods intervention study, operating room professionals participated in a full-day simulation-based teamwork training course. Learning objectives were nontechnical skills, specifically communication and collaboration across the team. Seventy-one staff members representing 5 operating room professions were included, and the average work experience of participants was 6 years. Quantitative data on self-efficacy and situational motivation were collected by questionnaires before and after training. Qualitative data were collected through 5 focus group interviews that took place in direct relation to the courses and included a total of 31 participants. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All occupations showed a similar pattern in terms of increases in self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation after the training. Analysis of the qualitative data showed that training in one's profession and in authentic multiprofessional teams was important factors for motivation. Participating staff described an awareness of undesirable communication barriers in surgical teams that can lead to risks for patients. Systematic training was definitely perceived as a means to reduce barriers and improve communication and collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simulation-based training was equally well received by all professional groups. Our results confirm the feasibility of this type of training for professional teams and promising opportunities for improving teamwork skills. The qualitative data reveal both opportunities and limitations for transferring the learning experiences to the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"8 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10351117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00257-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Operating rooms have become more technically complex due to new advanced procedures, which has increased demands on teamwork in the operating room. In response, team training has been proposed to improve team performance, workplace culture, and patient safety. We developed and delivered a simulation-based team training course for entire professional surgical teams. This type of intervention has been proposed by researchers but has not been widely published. The aims of this intervention study were to examine participants' reactions to the course in terms of their motivation for the training and their self-efficacy in relation to their performance, as well as their views on transferring the lessons learned in the course to their workplace.

Methods: In a prospective mixed-methods intervention study, operating room professionals participated in a full-day simulation-based teamwork training course. Learning objectives were nontechnical skills, specifically communication and collaboration across the team. Seventy-one staff members representing 5 operating room professions were included, and the average work experience of participants was 6 years. Quantitative data on self-efficacy and situational motivation were collected by questionnaires before and after training. Qualitative data were collected through 5 focus group interviews that took place in direct relation to the courses and included a total of 31 participants. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: All occupations showed a similar pattern in terms of increases in self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation after the training. Analysis of the qualitative data showed that training in one's profession and in authentic multiprofessional teams was important factors for motivation. Participating staff described an awareness of undesirable communication barriers in surgical teams that can lead to risks for patients. Systematic training was definitely perceived as a means to reduce barriers and improve communication and collaboration.

Conclusion: Simulation-based training was equally well received by all professional groups. Our results confirm the feasibility of this type of training for professional teams and promising opportunities for improving teamwork skills. The qualitative data reveal both opportunities and limitations for transferring the learning experiences to the workplace.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
所有职业都能受益——基于模拟的手术室团队合作训练的混合方法研究。
背景:由于新的先进的手术程序,手术室的技术变得更加复杂,这对手术室的团队合作提出了更高的要求。为此,团队培训已被提出以改善团队绩效、工作场所文化和患者安全。我们为整个专业外科团队开发并提供了基于模拟的团队培训课程。研究人员已经提出了这种类型的干预措施,但尚未广泛发表。本干预研究的目的是考察参与者对课程的反应,包括他们的培训动机和与他们的表现有关的自我效能感,以及他们对将课程所学到的知识应用到工作场所的看法。方法:在一项前瞻性混合方法干预研究中,手术室专业人员参加了全天基于模拟的团队合作培训课程。学习目标是非技术性的技能,特别是跨团队的沟通和协作。共纳入5个手术室专业的71名工作人员,平均工作年限为6年。采用问卷调查的方式收集培训前后学生自我效能感和情境动机的定量数据。定性数据是通过与课程直接相关的5个焦点小组访谈收集的,共包括31名参与者。使用主题分析对转录本进行编码和分析。结果:所有职业在自我效能感和内在动机方面均表现出相似的模式。定性数据分析表明,专业培训和真实的多专业团队培训是激励的重要因素。参与的工作人员描述了外科团队中不良沟通障碍的意识,这可能会给患者带来风险。系统的培训无疑被认为是减少障碍、改善沟通和协作的一种手段。结论:基于模拟的培训在所有专业群体中都得到了同样的好评。我们的研究结果证实了这种培训对专业团队的可行性,并为提高团队合作技能提供了良好的机会。定性数据揭示了将学习经验转移到工作场所的机会和限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Massive open online course: a new strategy for faculty development needs in healthcare simulation. Changing the conversation: impact of guidelines designed to optimize interprofessional facilitation of simulation-based team training. Speech recognition technology for assessing team debriefing communication and interaction patterns: An algorithmic toolkit for healthcare simulation educators. Effectiveness of hybrid simulation training on medical student performance in whole-task consultation of cardiac patients: The ASSIMILATE EXCELLENCE randomized waitlist-controlled trial. Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1