Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines.

Integrated healthcare journal Pub Date : 2023-02-14 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1136/ihj-2021-000100
Tess Marshall-Andon, Sebastian Walsh, Tara Berger-Gillam, Anees Ahmed Abdul Pari
{"title":"Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines.","authors":"Tess Marshall-Andon, Sebastian Walsh, Tara Berger-Gillam, Anees Ahmed Abdul Pari","doi":"10.1136/ihj-2021-000100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-COVID-19 syndrome is associated with significant health and potential socioeconomic burden. Due to its novel nature, there is a lack of clarity over best practice for the rehabilitation of patients with ongoing or new symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and service guidelines for post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was registered on PROSPERO and is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included guidelines formally published or endorsed by a recognised professional body, covering rehabilitation of people with symptoms following resolution of acute COVID-19 infection. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, NHS Evidence, MedRxiv, PsyArXiv and Google for terms related to COVID-19, rehabilitation and guideline. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, data extracted and quality assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools for clinical guidelines and the AGREE-HS tool for service guidelines. We included guidelines of sufficient quality in a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 12 790 articles, of which 37 guidelines (19 clinical only, 7 service only and 11 combined clinical and service) were included. Guidelines covered a range of countries, rehabilitation types, populations and rehabilitation settings. Synthesis of clinical guidelines (n=4) was structured following the patient pathway, from identification, to assessment, treatment and discharge, with consideration of specific patient groups. Synthesis of service guidelines (n=8) was structured according to the Donabedian framework.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Though the available post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines were generally of poor quality, there was a high degree of consensus regarding the breadth of symptoms, the need for holistic assessment by a broad multidisciplinary team and person-centred care. There was less clarity on management options, measuring outcomes and discharge criteria.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42021236049.</p>","PeriodicalId":73393,"journal":{"name":"Integrated healthcare journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/56/ec/ihj-2021-000100.PMC10240730.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Post-COVID-19 syndrome is associated with significant health and potential socioeconomic burden. Due to its novel nature, there is a lack of clarity over best practice for the rehabilitation of patients with ongoing or new symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. We conducted a systematic review of clinical and service guidelines for post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation.

Methods: This review was registered on PROSPERO and is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We included guidelines formally published or endorsed by a recognised professional body, covering rehabilitation of people with symptoms following resolution of acute COVID-19 infection. We searched Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, NHS Evidence, MedRxiv, PsyArXiv and Google for terms related to COVID-19, rehabilitation and guideline. Two reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, data extracted and quality assessed using the AGREE II and AGREE-REX tools for clinical guidelines and the AGREE-HS tool for service guidelines. We included guidelines of sufficient quality in a narrative synthesis.

Results: We identified 12 790 articles, of which 37 guidelines (19 clinical only, 7 service only and 11 combined clinical and service) were included. Guidelines covered a range of countries, rehabilitation types, populations and rehabilitation settings. Synthesis of clinical guidelines (n=4) was structured following the patient pathway, from identification, to assessment, treatment and discharge, with consideration of specific patient groups. Synthesis of service guidelines (n=8) was structured according to the Donabedian framework.

Discussion: Though the available post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines were generally of poor quality, there was a high degree of consensus regarding the breadth of symptoms, the need for holistic assessment by a broad multidisciplinary team and person-centred care. There was less clarity on management options, measuring outcomes and discharge criteria.

Prospero registration number: CRD42021236049.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19综合征后康复指南的系统回顾。
导言:COVID-19 后综合征对健康和潜在的社会经济造成了巨大负担。由于它的新颖性,COVID-19 急性感染后出现持续症状或新症状的患者的最佳康复实践尚不明确。我们对 COVID-19 综合征后康复的临床和服务指南进行了系统性回顾:本综述已在 PROSPERO 上注册,并根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南进行报告。我们纳入了由公认的专业机构正式出版或认可的指南,这些指南涵盖了急性 COVID-19 感染缓解后有症状者的康复治疗。我们在 Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Web of Science、NHS Evidence、MedRxiv、PsyArXiv 和 Google 中搜索了与 COVID-19、康复和指南相关的术语。由两名审稿人独立筛选纳入文章,使用 AGREE II 和 AGREE-REX 工具对临床指南进行数据提取和质量评估,使用 AGREE-HS 工具对服务指南进行数据提取和质量评估。我们将质量足够高的指南纳入叙事性综述:我们确定了 12 790 篇文章,并纳入了其中的 37 项指南(19 项仅针对临床,7 项仅针对服务,11 项结合了临床和服务)。指南涵盖了不同的国家、康复类型、人群和康复环境。临床指南的综述(4 篇)是按照患者从识别、评估、治疗到出院的路径进行的,并考虑到了特定的患者群体。服务指南(n=8)的合成则根据多纳比德框架进行:讨论:尽管现有的COVID-19综合征后康复指南质量普遍较差,但在症状的广泛性、由广泛的多学科团队进行整体评估的必要性以及以人为本的护理等方面达成了高度共识。但在管理方案、疗效评估和出院标准方面则不太明确:CRD42021236049。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines. Picturing aesthetic futures: values and visual tools within shared decision-making. Role of an Integrated Care System during COVID-19 and beyond: a qualitative study with recommendations to inform future development. Correction: Effectiveness of integrated care interventions for patients with long-term conditions: a review of systematic reviews Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1