Effectiveness of a population-based integrated care model in reducing hospital activity: an interrupted time series analysis.

Mohammad Hussein Housam Mansour, Subhash Pokhrel, Maurice Birnbaum, Nana Anokye
{"title":"Effectiveness of a population-based integrated care model in reducing hospital activity: an interrupted time series analysis.","authors":"Mohammad Hussein Housam Mansour,&nbsp;Subhash Pokhrel,&nbsp;Maurice Birnbaum,&nbsp;Nana Anokye","doi":"10.1136/ihj-2021-000104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>First impact assessment analysis of an integrated care model (ICM) to reduce hospital activity in the London Borough of Hillingdon, UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated a population-based ICM consisting of multiple interventions based on self-management, multidisciplinary teams, case management and discharge management. The sample included 331 330 registered Hillingdon residents (at the time of data extraction) between October 2018 and July 2020. Longitudinal data was extracted from the Whole Systems Integrated Care database. Interrupted time series Poisson and Negative binomial regressions were used to examine changes in non-elective hospital admissions (NEL admissions), accident and emergency visits (A&E) and length of stay (LoS) at the hospital. Multiple imputations were used to replace missing data. Subgroup analysis of various groups with and without long-term conditions (LTC) was also conducted using the same models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the whole registered population of Hillingdon at the time of data collection, gradual decline over time in NEL admissions (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.92), A&E visits (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.95) and LoS (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.94) following an immediate increase during the first months of implementation in the three outcomes was observed. Subgroup analysis across different groups, including those with and without LTCs, showed similar effects. Sensitivity analysis did not show a notable change compared with the original analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Hillingdon ICM showed effectiveness in reducing NEL admissions, A&E visits and LoS. However, further investigations and analyses could confirm the results of this study and rule out the potential effects of some confounding events, such as the emergence of COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":73393,"journal":{"name":"Integrated healthcare journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/03/ihj-2021-000104.PMC10327451.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2021-000104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: First impact assessment analysis of an integrated care model (ICM) to reduce hospital activity in the London Borough of Hillingdon, UK.

Methods: We evaluated a population-based ICM consisting of multiple interventions based on self-management, multidisciplinary teams, case management and discharge management. The sample included 331 330 registered Hillingdon residents (at the time of data extraction) between October 2018 and July 2020. Longitudinal data was extracted from the Whole Systems Integrated Care database. Interrupted time series Poisson and Negative binomial regressions were used to examine changes in non-elective hospital admissions (NEL admissions), accident and emergency visits (A&E) and length of stay (LoS) at the hospital. Multiple imputations were used to replace missing data. Subgroup analysis of various groups with and without long-term conditions (LTC) was also conducted using the same models.

Results: In the whole registered population of Hillingdon at the time of data collection, gradual decline over time in NEL admissions (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.92), A&E visits (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.95) and LoS (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.94) following an immediate increase during the first months of implementation in the three outcomes was observed. Subgroup analysis across different groups, including those with and without LTCs, showed similar effects. Sensitivity analysis did not show a notable change compared with the original analysis.

Conclusion: The Hillingdon ICM showed effectiveness in reducing NEL admissions, A&E visits and LoS. However, further investigations and analyses could confirm the results of this study and rule out the potential effects of some confounding events, such as the emergence of COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以人群为基础的综合护理模式在减少医院活动方面的有效性:中断时间序列分析。
目的:综合护理模式(ICM)的第一次影响评估分析,以减少希灵顿,英国伦敦自治市的医院活动。方法:我们评估了基于人群的ICM,包括基于自我管理、多学科团队、病例管理和出院管理的多种干预措施。样本包括2018年10月至2020年7月期间331,330名希灵顿注册居民(在数据提取时)。纵向数据取自Whole Systems Integrated Care数据库。使用中断时间序列泊松和负二项回归来检查非选择性住院(NEL入院)、意外和急诊(A&E)和住院时间(LoS)的变化。使用多重输入来替换缺失的数据。采用相同的模型对具有和不具有长期条件(LTC)的各组进行亚组分析。结果:在收集数据时,在Hillingdon的全部登记人口中,随着时间的推移,在三个结局实施的第一个月内立即增加后,NEL入院率(RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.90至0.92),A&E就诊率(RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.93至0.95)和LoS (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.92至0.94)逐渐下降。不同组的亚组分析,包括有和没有LTCs的组,显示出相似的效果。敏感性分析与原始分析相比无显著变化。结论:Hillingdon ICM在降低NEL入院率、急症就诊率和LoS方面具有显著效果。然而,进一步的调查和分析可以证实本研究的结果,并排除一些混杂事件的潜在影响,如COVID-19大流行的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines. Picturing aesthetic futures: values and visual tools within shared decision-making. Role of an Integrated Care System during COVID-19 and beyond: a qualitative study with recommendations to inform future development. Correction: Effectiveness of integrated care interventions for patients with long-term conditions: a review of systematic reviews Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1