Implementing the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) in clinical settings for patients with chronic conditions: a scoping review.

Integrated healthcare journal Pub Date : 2020-07-10 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1136/ihj-2019-000032
Rachael Kearns, Ben Harris-Roxas, Julie McDonald, Hyun Jung Song, Sarah Dennis, Mark Harris
{"title":"Implementing the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) in clinical settings for patients with chronic conditions: a scoping review.","authors":"Rachael Kearns, Ben Harris-Roxas, Julie McDonald, Hyun Jung Song, Sarah Dennis, Mark Harris","doi":"10.1136/ihj-2019-000032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) assesses the knowledge, skills and confidence of patients to manage their health, and has been consistently used as an outcome measure of health interventions. Using the PAM to tailor interventions to a patient's activation level is less understood. This literature review aimed to examine evidence for interventions using the PAM to tailor care for patients with chronic conditions, including enablers and barriers to implementation, and the impact on quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A scoping review methodology was used to identify literature reporting on PAM-tailored interventions. The Insignia Health website and Medline database were searched. Included papers were published in English from 2004 to 2017, from Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries, included adult patients with chronic conditions, and a PAM-tailored intervention. Eligible full-text papers were assessed against the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted into tables and summarised to assess the key findings, recurring themes and differences across papers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one papers describing the use of PAM-tailored interventions (n=21) were identified. Interventions included motivational interviewing, health coaching, self-management planning and risk profile assessment. The perceived value and function of the PAM held by organisations, clinicians and patients influenced implementation and use. Evidence for the impact of PAM-tailored interventions on quality of care was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PAM is being used to tailor a range of interventions for patients with chronic conditions. Clinician perceptions and understanding about the PAM's value and purpose influenced implementation. Further research is needed about how PAM-tailored interventions can be integrated into clinical practice, and guide the patient-clinician interaction, in ways that improve the quality of patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73393,"journal":{"name":"Integrated healthcare journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"e000032"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/cf/ihj-2019-000032.PMC10327461.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) assesses the knowledge, skills and confidence of patients to manage their health, and has been consistently used as an outcome measure of health interventions. Using the PAM to tailor interventions to a patient's activation level is less understood. This literature review aimed to examine evidence for interventions using the PAM to tailor care for patients with chronic conditions, including enablers and barriers to implementation, and the impact on quality of care.

Methods and analysis: A scoping review methodology was used to identify literature reporting on PAM-tailored interventions. The Insignia Health website and Medline database were searched. Included papers were published in English from 2004 to 2017, from Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries, included adult patients with chronic conditions, and a PAM-tailored intervention. Eligible full-text papers were assessed against the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted into tables and summarised to assess the key findings, recurring themes and differences across papers.

Results: Twenty-one papers describing the use of PAM-tailored interventions (n=21) were identified. Interventions included motivational interviewing, health coaching, self-management planning and risk profile assessment. The perceived value and function of the PAM held by organisations, clinicians and patients influenced implementation and use. Evidence for the impact of PAM-tailored interventions on quality of care was limited.

Conclusion: The PAM is being used to tailor a range of interventions for patients with chronic conditions. Clinician perceptions and understanding about the PAM's value and purpose influenced implementation. Further research is needed about how PAM-tailored interventions can be integrated into clinical practice, and guide the patient-clinician interaction, in ways that improve the quality of patient care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在临床环境中为慢性病患者实施患者激活测量法(PAM):范围综述。
目的:患者激活测量法(PAM)可评估患者管理自身健康的知识、技能和信心,一直被用作健康干预的结果测量法。利用患者激活度量表(PAM)来根据患者的激活水平制定干预措施的做法还不太为人所知。本文献综述旨在研究使用PAM为慢性病患者量身定制护理干预措施的证据,包括实施的推动因素和障碍,以及对护理质量的影响:我们采用了范围综述方法来确定有关 PAM 定制干预措施的文献报告。对 Insignia Health 网站和 Medline 数据库进行了检索。所纳入的文献均为 2004 年至 2017 年期间发表的英文文献,来自经济合作与发展组织成员国,包括患有慢性疾病的成年患者,以及针对 PAM 的干预措施。根据纳入标准对符合条件的全文论文进行了评估。将数据提取到表格中并进行总结,以评估各篇论文的主要发现、重复出现的主题和差异:结果:共发现 21 篇论文介绍了 PAM 定制干预措施的使用情况(n=21)。干预措施包括动机访谈、健康指导、自我管理规划和风险概况评估。组织、临床医生和患者对PAM的价值和功能的认知影响了PAM的实施和使用。根据 PAM 量身定制的干预措施对护理质量的影响证据有限:结论:PAM 被用于为慢性病患者量身定制一系列干预措施。临床医生对 PAM 的价值和目的的看法和理解影响了 PAM 的实施。还需要进一步研究如何将针对 PAM 的干预措施融入临床实践,并指导患者与医生之间的互动,从而提高患者护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines. Picturing aesthetic futures: values and visual tools within shared decision-making. Role of an Integrated Care System during COVID-19 and beyond: a qualitative study with recommendations to inform future development. Correction: Effectiveness of integrated care interventions for patients with long-term conditions: a review of systematic reviews Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1