Enhancing consultation time for primary paediatric care in the outpatient department.

Subhashchandra Daga, Achla Daga
{"title":"Enhancing consultation time for primary paediatric care in the outpatient department.","authors":"Subhashchandra Daga,&nbsp;Achla Daga","doi":"10.1136/ihj-2019-000012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To improve the duration and quality of consultation times during paediatric ambulatory care.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This, before and after study, compares consultation time and core activities. All the subjects attended the paediatric outpatient department (P-OPD) between 1 July 2013 and 31 October 2013.Initially, consultation time was recorded directly by using observer timing with a stopwatch on 10-12 patients on 3 consecutive days and estimated indirectly after the study. All subjects underwent some or all of the following assessments and interventions (core activities): danger sign detection, illness treatment and referral, growth assessment followed by appropriate dietetic advice, immunisation and parent counselling. We implemented an intervention structure that divided work among staff members and then compared core activities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 2204 patients attended the P-OPD over 108 days. Before the study, the average consultation time was less than 5 min (range 3.5-5 min), and the core activities included the treatment and referrals of illnesses and immunisation only. No treatment guidelines existed, and weight record was primarily for calculating the dose of the drug to be prescribed. The protocol did not include growth assessment and maintenance of detailed clinical records.After implementing the core activities through effective utilisation of existing resources, on an average, 20 patients received consultations per day, and the consultation time was approximately 12 min per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The P-OPD consultation time increased from 3.5-5 min to approximately 12 min per patient. Using the structured interventions, the range of assessments and interventions, during these consultations, increased without having to hire more staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":73393,"journal":{"name":"Integrated healthcare journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"e000012"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/ihj-2019-000012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To improve the duration and quality of consultation times during paediatric ambulatory care.

Methods and analysis: This, before and after study, compares consultation time and core activities. All the subjects attended the paediatric outpatient department (P-OPD) between 1 July 2013 and 31 October 2013.Initially, consultation time was recorded directly by using observer timing with a stopwatch on 10-12 patients on 3 consecutive days and estimated indirectly after the study. All subjects underwent some or all of the following assessments and interventions (core activities): danger sign detection, illness treatment and referral, growth assessment followed by appropriate dietetic advice, immunisation and parent counselling. We implemented an intervention structure that divided work among staff members and then compared core activities.

Results: During the study period, 2204 patients attended the P-OPD over 108 days. Before the study, the average consultation time was less than 5 min (range 3.5-5 min), and the core activities included the treatment and referrals of illnesses and immunisation only. No treatment guidelines existed, and weight record was primarily for calculating the dose of the drug to be prescribed. The protocol did not include growth assessment and maintenance of detailed clinical records.After implementing the core activities through effective utilisation of existing resources, on an average, 20 patients received consultations per day, and the consultation time was approximately 12 min per patient.

Conclusion: The P-OPD consultation time increased from 3.5-5 min to approximately 12 min per patient. Using the structured interventions, the range of assessments and interventions, during these consultations, increased without having to hire more staff.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加初级儿科门诊的会诊时间。
目的:提高儿科门诊会诊时间和会诊质量。方法与分析:在研究前后,对咨询时间和核心活动进行比较。所有受试者在2013年7月1日至2013年10月31日期间到儿科门诊部就诊。最初,通过连续3天使用秒表对10-12名患者进行观察员计时直接记录咨询时间,并在研究后间接估计。所有受试者都接受了以下部分或全部评估和干预(核心活动):危险迹象检测、疾病治疗和转诊、生长评估,随后是适当的饮食建议、免疫接种和家长咨询。我们实施了一种干预结构,在员工之间划分工作,然后比较核心活动。结果:在研究期间,2204例患者在108天内参加了P-OPD。在研究之前,平均咨询时间少于5分钟(范围为3.5-5分钟),核心活动仅包括疾病的治疗和转诊以及免疫接种。没有治疗指南,体重记录主要是为了计算所开药物的剂量。该方案不包括生长评估和详细临床记录的维护。通过有效利用现有资源实施核心活动后,平均每天有20名患者就诊,每位患者就诊时间约为12分钟。结论:P-OPD会诊时间从3.5-5 min增加到约12 min。使用结构化干预措施,在这些磋商期间,评估和干预措施的范围扩大了,而不必雇用更多的工作人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines. Picturing aesthetic futures: values and visual tools within shared decision-making. Role of an Integrated Care System during COVID-19 and beyond: a qualitative study with recommendations to inform future development. Correction: Effectiveness of integrated care interventions for patients with long-term conditions: a review of systematic reviews Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1