Paediatric hospital visit with laboratory-confirmed influenza improved family members' influenza vaccination.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Central European journal of public health Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.21101/cejph.a7468
Hussein Zaitoon, Sarah Cohen, Dana Lahoud, Isaac Srugo, Irina Chistyakov, Ellen Bamberger
{"title":"Paediatric hospital visit with laboratory-confirmed influenza improved family members' influenza vaccination.","authors":"Hussein Zaitoon,&nbsp;Sarah Cohen,&nbsp;Dana Lahoud,&nbsp;Isaac Srugo,&nbsp;Irina Chistyakov,&nbsp;Ellen Bamberger","doi":"10.21101/cejph.a7468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Vaccination is the primary intervention to prevent influenza infection, yet vaccine uptake remains low among children and other at-risk patients. The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of a paediatric hospital visit with laboratory-confirmed influenza on the influenza vaccination behaviour of participants and their family members in the subsequent influenza season.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compared the influenza vaccination coverage for participants < 18 years of age with a clinical suspicion of influenza in 2017-2018 during a hospital visit, in two subsequent influenza seasons. Data was retrieved from the hospital electronic medical record and a follow-up questionnaire (2018-2019) to ascertain the common reason(s) that families did not vaccinate their children the following year (2018-2019). The children were distributed into positive- (antigen and/or PCR) and negative-influenza groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 children were enrolled in our study. Participants' mean age was 4.6 years and 74 (55.6%) were males. Overall, 47 (35.3%) had confirmed influenza virus. A significant increase in influenza immunization was found among both positive- and negative-influenza participants between 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 (6.4% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.001; 8.1% vs. 29.1%, p < 0.001, respectively), as well as among family members of positive-influenza participants - siblings and parents (6.4% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.003; 0% vs. 17%, p < 0.001, respectively). Common reasons for failure to vaccinate included doubt in vaccine effectiveness, unlikely to get \"flu\", busy, and side effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that a paediatric hospital visit with laboratory-confirmed influenza increases vaccine uptake among families. Future studies should aim to evaluate evidence-based interventions to improve influenza vaccine uptake among children.</p>","PeriodicalId":9823,"journal":{"name":"Central European journal of public health","volume":"31 2","pages":"97-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a7468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Vaccination is the primary intervention to prevent influenza infection, yet vaccine uptake remains low among children and other at-risk patients. The aim of the study is to investigate the impact of a paediatric hospital visit with laboratory-confirmed influenza on the influenza vaccination behaviour of participants and their family members in the subsequent influenza season.

Methods: This study compared the influenza vaccination coverage for participants < 18 years of age with a clinical suspicion of influenza in 2017-2018 during a hospital visit, in two subsequent influenza seasons. Data was retrieved from the hospital electronic medical record and a follow-up questionnaire (2018-2019) to ascertain the common reason(s) that families did not vaccinate their children the following year (2018-2019). The children were distributed into positive- (antigen and/or PCR) and negative-influenza groups.

Results: A total of 133 children were enrolled in our study. Participants' mean age was 4.6 years and 74 (55.6%) were males. Overall, 47 (35.3%) had confirmed influenza virus. A significant increase in influenza immunization was found among both positive- and negative-influenza participants between 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 (6.4% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.001; 8.1% vs. 29.1%, p < 0.001, respectively), as well as among family members of positive-influenza participants - siblings and parents (6.4% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.003; 0% vs. 17%, p < 0.001, respectively). Common reasons for failure to vaccinate included doubt in vaccine effectiveness, unlikely to get "flu", busy, and side effects.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a paediatric hospital visit with laboratory-confirmed influenza increases vaccine uptake among families. Future studies should aim to evaluate evidence-based interventions to improve influenza vaccine uptake among children.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去儿科医院接受化验证实的流感,可改善家庭成员的流感疫苗接种情况。
目的:疫苗接种是预防流感感染的主要干预措施,但儿童和其他高危患者的疫苗接种率仍然很低。该研究的目的是调查在随后的流感季节中,实验室确诊流感的儿科医院就诊对参与者及其家庭成员流感疫苗接种行为的影响。方法:本研究比较了2017-2018年住院期间临床怀疑有流感的18岁以下参与者的流感疫苗接种覆盖率,以及随后的两个流感季节。从医院电子病历和随访问卷(2018-2019年)中检索数据,以确定家庭在下一年(2018-2019年)未给孩子接种疫苗的常见原因。将患儿分为流感阳性(抗原和/或PCR)组和流感阴性组。结果:133名儿童被纳入我们的研究。参与者的平均年龄为4.6岁,男性74人(55.6%)。总共有47人(35.3%)确诊感染流感病毒。在2017-2018年和2018-2019年期间,流感阳性和阴性参与者的流感免疫接种均显著增加(6.4% vs. 27.7%, p < 0.001;8.1%对29.1%,p < 0.001),以及流感阳性参与者的家庭成员——兄弟姐妹和父母(6.4%对19.6%,p = 0.003;0% vs. 17%, p < 0.001)。未能接种疫苗的常见原因包括对疫苗有效性的怀疑、不太可能得“流感”、忙碌和副作用。结论:我们的研究结果表明,儿科医院就诊实验室确诊流感增加疫苗的家庭接种率。未来的研究应旨在评估以证据为基础的干预措施,以提高儿童的流感疫苗接种率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Central European journal of public health
Central European journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original articles on disease prevention and health protection, environmental impacts on health, the role of nutrition in health promotion, results of population health studies and critiques of specific health issues including intervention measures such as vaccination and its effectiveness. The review articles are targeted at providing up-to-date information in the sphere of public health. The Journal is geographically targeted at the European region but will accept specialised articles from foreign sources that contribute to public health issues also applicable to the European cultural milieu.
期刊最新文献
A post-pandemic trend in the consumption of dietary supplements among residents of Lithuania. Comparison of cervical cancer screening models based on Pap and HPV tests in Tbilisi, Georgia. Course and complications of influenza A in seniors over 65 years of age. Impact of climate on varicella distribution in Bulgaria (2009-2018). Mediterranean diet adherence in 9-years old children: a cross-sectional study in the part of the Split-Dalmatia County, Croatia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1