The role of health behavior theories in parents' initial engagement with parenting interventions.

IF 4.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of consulting and clinical psychology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1037/ccp0000816
Carolina Gonzalez, Alina Morawska, Divna M Haslam
{"title":"The role of health behavior theories in parents' initial engagement with parenting interventions.","authors":"Carolina Gonzalez,&nbsp;Alina Morawska,&nbsp;Divna M Haslam","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between health belief model (HBM; i.e., perceived threat, benefits, costs, and self-efficacy) and theory of planned behavior (TPB; i.e., attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control) constructs and parents' intention to participate and initial engagement (i.e., recruitment, enrollment, and first attendance) with a parenting intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were parents (<i>n</i> = 699, mean age = 38.29 years, 90.4% mothers) of 2-12-year-old children. The study conducted secondary analysis of cross-sectional data collected for an experimental study of engagement strategies. Participants provided self-report data on HBM constructs, TPB constructs, and intention to participate. Measures of initial parent engagement were also collected (i.e., recruitment, enrollment, and first attendance). Logistic regressions evaluated the impact of HBM and TPB constructs, and their combination, on intention to participate and initial parent engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses indicated that all HBM constructs increased the odds of parents' intention to participate and enrollment. In terms of TPB, parents' attitudes and subjective norms, but not perceived behavioral control, were significant predictors of intention to participate and enrollment. When combined in one model, parents' perceived costs, self-efficacy, attitudes, and subjective norms predicted intention to participate, whereas perceived threat, costs, attitudes, and subjective norms increased odds of enrolling in the intervention. Regression models for first attendance were not significant and those for recruitment could not be conducted due to lack of variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings demonstrate the relevance of using both HBM and TPB constructs when enhancing parent intention to participate and enrollment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"91 8","pages":"485-495"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000816","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relationship between health belief model (HBM; i.e., perceived threat, benefits, costs, and self-efficacy) and theory of planned behavior (TPB; i.e., attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control) constructs and parents' intention to participate and initial engagement (i.e., recruitment, enrollment, and first attendance) with a parenting intervention.

Method: Participants were parents (n = 699, mean age = 38.29 years, 90.4% mothers) of 2-12-year-old children. The study conducted secondary analysis of cross-sectional data collected for an experimental study of engagement strategies. Participants provided self-report data on HBM constructs, TPB constructs, and intention to participate. Measures of initial parent engagement were also collected (i.e., recruitment, enrollment, and first attendance). Logistic regressions evaluated the impact of HBM and TPB constructs, and their combination, on intention to participate and initial parent engagement.

Results: Analyses indicated that all HBM constructs increased the odds of parents' intention to participate and enrollment. In terms of TPB, parents' attitudes and subjective norms, but not perceived behavioral control, were significant predictors of intention to participate and enrollment. When combined in one model, parents' perceived costs, self-efficacy, attitudes, and subjective norms predicted intention to participate, whereas perceived threat, costs, attitudes, and subjective norms increased odds of enrolling in the intervention. Regression models for first attendance were not significant and those for recruitment could not be conducted due to lack of variance.

Conclusions: The findings demonstrate the relevance of using both HBM and TPB constructs when enhancing parent intention to participate and enrollment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康行为理论在父母最初参与育儿干预中的作用。
目的:探讨健康信念模型(HBM)与健康信念模型(HBM)的关系;即感知威胁、利益、成本和自我效能)和计划行为理论(TPB;即,态度、社会规范和感知行为控制)结构和父母参与和最初参与(即,招募、登记和首次出席)的意图。方法:研究对象为2-12岁儿童的父母(n = 699,平均年龄38.29岁,90.4%为母亲)。本研究对参与策略实验研究收集的横截面数据进行了二次分析。参与者提供了关于HBM构念、TPB构念和参与意向的自我报告数据。还收集了初始家长参与的度量(即,招募、注册和首次出勤)。Logistic回归评估了HBM和TPB结构及其组合对参与意愿和初始父母参与的影响。结果:分析表明,所有HBM结构都增加了家长参与和登记的几率。在TPB方面,家长态度和主观规范是参与意愿和入学的显著预测因子,而感知行为控制不是。当结合在一个模型中时,父母的感知成本、自我效能、态度和主观规范预测了参与的意愿,而感知威胁、成本、态度和主观规范增加了参与干预的几率。首次入职的回归模型不显著,招募的回归模型由于缺乏方差而不能进行。结论:研究结果表明,使用HBM和TPB结构在增强家长参与和入学意愿方面具有相关性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology® (JCCP) publishes original contributions on the following topics: the development, validity, and use of techniques of diagnosis and treatment of disordered behaviorstudies of a variety of populations that have clinical interest, including but not limited to medical patients, ethnic minorities, persons with serious mental illness, and community samplesstudies that have a cross-cultural or demographic focus and are of interest for treating behavior disordersstudies of personality and of its assessment and development where these have a clear bearing on problems of clinical dysfunction and treatmentstudies of gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation that have a clear bearing on diagnosis, assessment, and treatmentstudies of psychosocial aspects of health behaviors. Studies that focus on populations that fall anywhere within the lifespan are considered. JCCP welcomes submissions on treatment and prevention in all areas of clinical and clinical–health psychology and especially on topics that appeal to a broad clinical–scientist and practitioner audience. JCCP encourages the submission of theory–based interventions, studies that investigate mechanisms of change, and studies of the effectiveness of treatments in real-world settings. JCCP recommends that authors of clinical trials pre-register their studies with an appropriate clinical trial registry (e.g., ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu) though both registered and unregistered trials will continue to be considered at this time.
期刊最新文献
Telehealth-delivered depression prevention: Short-term outcomes from a school-based randomized controlled trial. Disruptive child behavior severity and parenting program session attendance: Individual participant data meta-analysis. Change processes associated with functional improvement in a web-based version of Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (webSTAIR) for trauma-exposed veterans. Data-informed psychological therapy, measurement-based care, and precision mental health. School-based organizational skills training for students in grades 3-5: A cluster randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1