Diuretics or ultrafiltration in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-19 DOI:10.1111/1744-9987.14037
Vasileios Terpos, Stefanos Roumeliotis, Panagiotis I Georgianos, Eleni Papa, Dimitrios G Tsalikakis, Evangelos Papachristou, Vassilios Liakopoulos
{"title":"Diuretics or ultrafiltration in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Vasileios Terpos, Stefanos Roumeliotis, Panagiotis I Georgianos, Eleni Papa, Dimitrios G Tsalikakis, Evangelos Papachristou, Vassilios Liakopoulos","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.14037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospitalization for decompensated heart failure is a major public health issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis to summarize and analyze if there is a benefit in using ultrafiltration over diuretics in terms of reducing mortality or hospital readmissions, primarily and identified 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 941 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to diuretics, treatment with ultrafiltration was associated with a significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations (risk ratio [RR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.96, p = 0.02) and significant increase in weight and net fluid loss (mean difference [MD]: -1.55, CI: -2.36 to -0.74, p = 0.0002) and (MD: -2.10, CI: -3.32 to -0.89, p = 0.0007), respectively. There was no significant difference among treatments regarding the duration of hospitalization, the increase in serum creatinine levels, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with decompensated heart failure, compared to diuretics, ultrafiltration is associated with reduced rehospitalizations and increased weight/net fluid loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":23021,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis","volume":" ","pages":"9-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hospitalization for decompensated heart failure is a major public health issue.

Methods: We performed a meta-analysis to summarize and analyze if there is a benefit in using ultrafiltration over diuretics in terms of reducing mortality or hospital readmissions, primarily and identified 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 941 patients.

Results: Compared to diuretics, treatment with ultrafiltration was associated with a significant reduction in heart failure hospitalizations (risk ratio [RR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.96, p = 0.02) and significant increase in weight and net fluid loss (mean difference [MD]: -1.55, CI: -2.36 to -0.74, p = 0.0002) and (MD: -2.10, CI: -3.32 to -0.89, p = 0.0007), respectively. There was no significant difference among treatments regarding the duration of hospitalization, the increase in serum creatinine levels, and mortality.

Conclusion: Among patients with decompensated heart failure, compared to diuretics, ultrafiltration is associated with reduced rehospitalizations and increased weight/net fluid loss.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭的利尿剂或超滤疗法:最新系统综述和荟萃分析。
导言失代偿性心力衰竭住院治疗是一个重大的公共卫生问题:我们进行了一项荟萃分析,总结并分析了在降低死亡率或再住院率方面,使用超滤治疗是否比使用利尿剂更有益处,主要确定了10项随机对照试验(RCT),包括941名患者:与利尿剂相比,超滤治疗可显著降低心衰住院率(风险比 [RR]:0.72;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.55-0.96,P = 0.02),并可显著增加体重和净体液流失量(平均差 [MD]:-1.55,CI:-2.36 至 -0.74,P = 0.0002)和(MD:-2.10,CI:-3.32 至 -0.89,P = 0.0007)。不同治疗方法在住院时间、血清肌酐水平升高和死亡率方面没有明显差异:结论:在失代偿性心力衰竭患者中,与利尿剂相比,超滤与减少再住院和增加体重/净体液丢失有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.50%
发文量
166
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis is the official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. The Journal publishes original articles, editorial comments, review articles, case reports, meeting abstracts and Communications information on apheresis and dialysis technologies and treatments.
期刊最新文献
Fear of falling and associated influencing factors in patients on maintenance hemodialysis Enhancing hepatitis C management in ESRD: Evaluating efficacy and safety of alternative antiviral regimens Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis Forthcoming Events October 2024 Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis Forthcoming Events August 2024 Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the patient on hemodialysis resilience scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1