Integrating Theory with Education about Genetic Risk for Alcohol Use Disorder: The Effects of a Brief Online Educational Tool on Elements of the Health Belief Model.

Complex psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-03-29 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000530222
Morgan N Driver, Sally I-Chun Kuo, Jehannine Austin, Danielle M Dick
{"title":"Integrating Theory with Education about Genetic Risk for Alcohol Use Disorder: The Effects of a Brief Online Educational Tool on Elements of the Health Belief Model.","authors":"Morgan N Driver, Sally I-Chun Kuo, Jehannine Austin, Danielle M Dick","doi":"10.1159/000530222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The utility of genetic risk information relies on the assumption that individuals will use the information to change behavior to reduce risk of developing health problems. Educational interventions designed to target elements of the Health Belief Model have shown to be effective in promoting behaviors for positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in 325 college students to assess whether a brief, online educational intervention altered elements of the Health Belief Model that are known to be associated with motivations and intentions to change behavior. The RCT included a control condition, an intervention condition that received information about alcohol use disorder (AUD), and an intervention condition that received information about polygenic risk scores and AUD. We used <i>t</i> tests and ANOVA methods to compare differences in beliefs related to the Health Belief Model across study conditions and demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Providing educational information did not impact worry about developing AUD, perceived susceptibility and severity of developing alcohol problems, or perceived benefits and barriers of risk-reducing actions. Individuals in the condition that received educational information about polygenic risk scores and AUD reported higher perceived chance of developing AUD than individuals in the control condition (adj. <i>p</i> < 0.01). Sex, race/ethnicity, family history, and drinking status were associated with several components of the Health Belief Model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this study demonstrate the need to better design and refine the educational information intended to accompany the return of genetic feedback for AUD to better promote risk-reducing behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":72654,"journal":{"name":"Complex psychiatry","volume":"9 1-4","pages":"89-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10315003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The utility of genetic risk information relies on the assumption that individuals will use the information to change behavior to reduce risk of developing health problems. Educational interventions designed to target elements of the Health Belief Model have shown to be effective in promoting behaviors for positive outcomes.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in 325 college students to assess whether a brief, online educational intervention altered elements of the Health Belief Model that are known to be associated with motivations and intentions to change behavior. The RCT included a control condition, an intervention condition that received information about alcohol use disorder (AUD), and an intervention condition that received information about polygenic risk scores and AUD. We used t tests and ANOVA methods to compare differences in beliefs related to the Health Belief Model across study conditions and demographic characteristics.

Results: Providing educational information did not impact worry about developing AUD, perceived susceptibility and severity of developing alcohol problems, or perceived benefits and barriers of risk-reducing actions. Individuals in the condition that received educational information about polygenic risk scores and AUD reported higher perceived chance of developing AUD than individuals in the control condition (adj. p < 0.01). Sex, race/ethnicity, family history, and drinking status were associated with several components of the Health Belief Model.

Conclusion: Findings from this study demonstrate the need to better design and refine the educational information intended to accompany the return of genetic feedback for AUD to better promote risk-reducing behaviors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将酒精使用障碍遗传风险的理论与教育相结合:一个简短的在线教育工具对健康信念模型要素的影响。
引言:遗传风险信息的效用依赖于这样一种假设,即个人会利用这些信息来改变行为,以降低出现健康问题的风险。旨在针对健康信念模型要素的教育干预措施已被证明在促进积极结果的行为方面是有效的。方法:在325名大学生中进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT),以评估简短的在线教育干预是否改变了健康信念模型中已知与改变行为的动机和意图相关的元素。随机对照试验包括对照条件、接受酒精使用障碍(AUD)信息的干预条件和接受多基因风险评分和AUD信息的干预情况。我们使用t检验和方差分析方法来比较研究条件和人口统计学特征中与健康信念模型相关的信念的差异。结果:提供教育信息不会影响对患AUD的担忧、对患酒精问题的易感性和严重性的感知,或对降低风险行动的益处和障碍的感知。接受多基因风险评分和AUD教育信息的患者报告称,与对照组患者相比,其患AUD的感知机会更高(adj.p<0.01)。性别、种族/民族、家族史,结论:本研究的结果表明,有必要更好地设计和完善旨在伴随AUD基因反馈回归的教育信息,以更好地促进降低风险的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epigenetic Alterations in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Comprehensive Review of Molecular Markers. Olfactory Epithelium Infection by SARS-CoV-2: Possible Neuroinflammatory Consequences of COVID-19. Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Psychiatric Side Effects: A Review Internet-Based Trauma Recovery Intervention for Nurses: A Randomized Controlled Trial Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1