Prescribing error reporting in primary care: a narrative synthesis systematic review.

Kathryn Bullen, Nicola Hall, John Sherwood, Nicola Wake, Gemma Donovan
{"title":"Prescribing error reporting in primary care: a narrative synthesis systematic review.","authors":"Kathryn Bullen,&nbsp;Nicola Hall,&nbsp;John Sherwood,&nbsp;Nicola Wake,&nbsp;Gemma Donovan","doi":"10.1136/ihj-2019-000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prescribing errors can cause avoidable harm to patients. Most prescriptions originate in primary care, where medications tend to be self-administered and errors have the most potential to cause harm. Reporting prescribing errors can identify trends and reduce the risk of the reoccurrence of incidents; however, under-reporting is common. The organisation of care and the movement of prescriptions from general practice to community pharmacy may create difficulties for professionals to effectively report errors. This review aims specifically to identify primary research studies that examine barriers and facilitators to prescription error reporting across primary care. A systematic research of the literature was completed in July 2019. Four databases (PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL and Web of Science) were searched for relevant studies. No date or language limits were applied. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and data were descriptively and narratively synthesised. Ten articles were included in the final analysis. Seven studies considered prescription errors and error reporting within general practice and three within a community pharmacy setting. Findings from the included studies are presented across five themes, including definition of an error, prescribing error reporting culture, reporting processes, communication and capacity. Healthcare professionals appreciate the value of prescription error reporting, but there are key barriers to implementation, including time, fear of reprisal and organisation separation within primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73393,"journal":{"name":"Integrated healthcare journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"e000026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/ihj-2019-000026","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Prescribing errors can cause avoidable harm to patients. Most prescriptions originate in primary care, where medications tend to be self-administered and errors have the most potential to cause harm. Reporting prescribing errors can identify trends and reduce the risk of the reoccurrence of incidents; however, under-reporting is common. The organisation of care and the movement of prescriptions from general practice to community pharmacy may create difficulties for professionals to effectively report errors. This review aims specifically to identify primary research studies that examine barriers and facilitators to prescription error reporting across primary care. A systematic research of the literature was completed in July 2019. Four databases (PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL and Web of Science) were searched for relevant studies. No date or language limits were applied. Eligible studies were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and data were descriptively and narratively synthesised. Ten articles were included in the final analysis. Seven studies considered prescription errors and error reporting within general practice and three within a community pharmacy setting. Findings from the included studies are presented across five themes, including definition of an error, prescribing error reporting culture, reporting processes, communication and capacity. Healthcare professionals appreciate the value of prescription error reporting, but there are key barriers to implementation, including time, fear of reprisal and organisation separation within primary care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健处方错误报告:叙述综合系统回顾。
处方错误会对患者造成本可避免的伤害。大多数处方来自初级保健,在初级保健中,药物往往是自我施用的,错误最有可能造成伤害。报告处方错误可以识别趋势并减少事件再次发生的风险;然而,少报是很常见的。护理的组织和处方从一般做法到社区药房的运动可能会给专业人员有效地报告错误造成困难。这篇综述的目的是明确确定初级保健中处方错误报告的障碍和促进因素的初步研究。2019年7月完成了文献的系统研究。4个数据库(PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL和Web of Science)检索相关研究。没有日期或语言限制。使用混合方法评估工具对符合条件的研究进行严格评估,并对数据进行描述性和叙述性综合。在最后的分析中包括了10篇文章。七项研究考虑了一般实践中的处方错误和错误报告,三项研究考虑了社区药房的设置。所纳入研究的结果分为五个主题,包括错误的定义、处方错误报告文化、报告程序、沟通和能力。医疗保健专业人员认识到处方错误报告的价值,但实施过程中存在主要障碍,包括时间、对报复的恐惧以及初级保健中的组织分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Systematic review of post-COVID-19 syndrome rehabilitation guidelines. Picturing aesthetic futures: values and visual tools within shared decision-making. Role of an Integrated Care System during COVID-19 and beyond: a qualitative study with recommendations to inform future development. Correction: Effectiveness of integrated care interventions for patients with long-term conditions: a review of systematic reviews Equity in healthcare access and service coverage for older people: a scoping review of the conceptual literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1