Novel learning ratio from the NAB list learning test distinguishes between clinical groups: clinical validation and sex-related differences.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-21 DOI:10.1080/13803395.2023.2236772
Matthew G Hall, Scott C Wollman, Mary E Haines, Mellisa A Boyle, Hannah K Richardson, Dustin B Hammers
{"title":"Novel learning ratio from the NAB list learning test distinguishes between clinical groups: clinical validation and sex-related differences.","authors":"Matthew G Hall, Scott C Wollman, Mary E Haines, Mellisa A Boyle, Hannah K Richardson, Dustin B Hammers","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2023.2236772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>List-learning tasks provide a wealth of information about an individual's cognitive abilities: attention, encoding, storage, retrieval, recognition. A more recently developed metric, the Learning Ratio (LR), supplements information about cognitive ability and can assist the clinician in determining whether an individual has cognitive impairment. The LR is calculated by taking the difference between the individuals' raw score on the first learning trial and their raw score on the last learning trial, which is then divided by the number of words left to be learned after the first learning trial. A LR derived from the list-learning task from the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB) was evaluated to determine ability to distinguish those with normal cognition from those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Results from the present study indicate the NAB LR is able to distinguish between clinical groups; recommended cutoffs for the NAB LR scores are provided. We also found a significant female sex-advantage for the NAB LR in those with normal memory ability and demonstrated the female sex advantage decreased with increasing memory impairment. Taken together, the NAB LR may assist clinicians in making an accurate and early diagnosis and may be helpful for tracking learning and functioning across multiple assessments. .</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"715-726"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2023.2236772","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

List-learning tasks provide a wealth of information about an individual's cognitive abilities: attention, encoding, storage, retrieval, recognition. A more recently developed metric, the Learning Ratio (LR), supplements information about cognitive ability and can assist the clinician in determining whether an individual has cognitive impairment. The LR is calculated by taking the difference between the individuals' raw score on the first learning trial and their raw score on the last learning trial, which is then divided by the number of words left to be learned after the first learning trial. A LR derived from the list-learning task from the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB) was evaluated to determine ability to distinguish those with normal cognition from those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. Results from the present study indicate the NAB LR is able to distinguish between clinical groups; recommended cutoffs for the NAB LR scores are provided. We also found a significant female sex-advantage for the NAB LR in those with normal memory ability and demonstrated the female sex advantage decreased with increasing memory impairment. Taken together, the NAB LR may assist clinicians in making an accurate and early diagnosis and may be helpful for tracking learning and functioning across multiple assessments. .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 NAB 列表学习测试中得出的新学习比率可区分不同的临床群体:临床验证和性别差异。
列表学习任务提供了大量有关个人认知能力的信息:注意力、编码、存储、检索、识别。学习比率(Learning Ratio,LR)是最近开发的一种衡量标准,它是对认知能力信息的补充,可以帮助临床医生判断一个人是否存在认知障碍。学习比率的计算方法是,将个人在第一次学习试验中的原始得分与最后一次学习试验中的原始得分之差,除以第一次学习试验后所剩待学单词的数量。本研究对神经心理评估测试(NAB)中列表学习任务的 LR 进行了评估,以确定该 LR 能否区分认知能力正常者与轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆症患者。本研究的结果表明,NAB LR 能够区分临床组别;本研究还提供了 NAB LR 分数的建议临界值。我们还发现,在记忆能力正常的人群中,女性在 NAB LR 中具有明显的性别优势,并证明女性的性别优势随着记忆障碍的加重而减弱。综上所述,NAB LR 可以帮助临床医生做出准确的早期诊断,并有助于在多次评估中跟踪学习和功能情况。.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Emotion regulation strategies in subclinical insomnia: electrophysiological insights into neural processing differences. Cardiometabolic risk mediates the association between perceived stress and learning and memory similarly among Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic White individuals. Montefiore Einstein Robust Geriatric Normative Project (MERGER-NP): clinical decision rules for incorporating word reading into regression-based demographic norms and estimating premorbid cognitive functioning. The impacts of rumination and affective symptoms on subjective-objective sleep discrepancy. The Chinese version of the Short Cognitive Performance Test (SKT) - psychometric criteria and cross-validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1