Immersion Experiences for Biomedical Engineering Undergraduates: Comparing Strategies and Local Partnerships at Two Institutions.

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Engineering Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Justin Huber, Steven Higbee, Christina Espinosa, Babak Bazrgari, Sharon Miller
{"title":"Immersion Experiences for Biomedical Engineering Undergraduates: Comparing Strategies and Local Partnerships at Two Institutions.","authors":"Justin Huber,&nbsp;Steven Higbee,&nbsp;Christina Espinosa,&nbsp;Babak Bazrgari,&nbsp;Sharon Miller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immersion experiences for undergraduate students in biomedical engineering are key contributors to their ability to identify medical needs. Despite this, as few as 25% of surveyed programs report providing such opportunities. Since 2010 when the National Institute of Health began its R25 grant mechanism to support curricular development toward team-based design, several institutions have established programs for immersion experiences, which provide precedent for their implementation. Published results from such immersion experiences highlight successes in structure and changes in student perspectives after these experiences. As more institutions expand their biomedical engineering curriculum with new immersion-focused programs, it is important to learn from these precedents while also considering opportunities to improve. For newly funded groups that are developing and implementing programs, they may find improved success by strategic use of unique partnerships. However, these partnerships may not be immediately evident to program organizers. Our objective is to discuss two institutions that recently established programs for immersion experience. In the comparison of our two immersion programs, we found five overlapping core features that include: immersion partner collaboration, team-based immersion experiences, needs-finding emphasis, team-based engineering design experiences, and immersion assessment and evaluation. Both programs developed collaborative partnerships with nearby medical schools. Additionally, one program partnered with a community resource (i.e., Human Development Institute). Despite nuanced program differences, we found that students at both programs self-reported increased knowledge or confidence in aspects of the design process (e.g., identifying and refining user needs, concept generation). Our results also highlight student gains unique to their programs - UK students self-reported gains on disability topics and IUPUI students self-reported gains on socioeconomic awareness. In summary, immersion partner collaboration, or partnership, surfaced as a core feature for both programs, and students in both immersion programs endorsed enhanced knowledge or confidence in engineering design.</p>","PeriodicalId":54960,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353772/pdf/nihms-1916000.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immersion experiences for undergraduate students in biomedical engineering are key contributors to their ability to identify medical needs. Despite this, as few as 25% of surveyed programs report providing such opportunities. Since 2010 when the National Institute of Health began its R25 grant mechanism to support curricular development toward team-based design, several institutions have established programs for immersion experiences, which provide precedent for their implementation. Published results from such immersion experiences highlight successes in structure and changes in student perspectives after these experiences. As more institutions expand their biomedical engineering curriculum with new immersion-focused programs, it is important to learn from these precedents while also considering opportunities to improve. For newly funded groups that are developing and implementing programs, they may find improved success by strategic use of unique partnerships. However, these partnerships may not be immediately evident to program organizers. Our objective is to discuss two institutions that recently established programs for immersion experience. In the comparison of our two immersion programs, we found five overlapping core features that include: immersion partner collaboration, team-based immersion experiences, needs-finding emphasis, team-based engineering design experiences, and immersion assessment and evaluation. Both programs developed collaborative partnerships with nearby medical schools. Additionally, one program partnered with a community resource (i.e., Human Development Institute). Despite nuanced program differences, we found that students at both programs self-reported increased knowledge or confidence in aspects of the design process (e.g., identifying and refining user needs, concept generation). Our results also highlight student gains unique to their programs - UK students self-reported gains on disability topics and IUPUI students self-reported gains on socioeconomic awareness. In summary, immersion partner collaboration, or partnership, surfaced as a core feature for both programs, and students in both immersion programs endorsed enhanced knowledge or confidence in engineering design.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物医学工程本科生的沉浸式体验:比较两所院校的策略和当地合作伙伴关系。
对于生物医学工程专业的本科生来说,沉浸式体验是他们识别医疗需求能力的关键因素。尽管如此,只有25%的被调查项目报告提供了这样的机会。自2010年美国国立卫生研究院(National Institute of Health)启动R25资助机制,以支持面向团队设计的课程开发以来,一些机构已经建立了浸入式体验项目,这为它们的实施提供了先例。这种沉浸式体验的发表结果强调了这些体验后学生视角的结构和变化的成功。随着越来越多的机构将其生物医学工程课程扩展为新的浸入式课程,从这些先例中学习并考虑改进的机会是很重要的。对于正在开发和实施项目的新资助团体来说,通过战略性地利用独特的伙伴关系,他们可能会发现取得了更大的成功。然而,这些伙伴关系可能不会立即对项目组织者明显。我们的目标是讨论两所最近建立沉浸式体验项目的机构。通过比较我们的两个浸入式课程,我们发现了五个重叠的核心特征,包括:浸入式合作伙伴协作、基于团队的浸入式体验、需求发现重点、基于团队的工程设计体验以及浸入式评估和评估。两个项目都与附近的医学院建立了合作伙伴关系。此外,还有一个项目与社区资源(即人类发展研究所)合作。尽管有细微的程序差异,我们发现两个程序的学生自我报告在设计过程的各个方面(例如,识别和细化用户需求,概念生成)增加了知识或信心。我们的研究结果还突出了学生在他们的项目中获得的独特收益——英国学生自我报告的残疾主题收益,IUPUI学生自我报告的社会经济意识收益。总之,沉浸式合作伙伴合作或伙伴关系是两个项目的核心特征,两个浸入式项目的学生都认可提高了对工程设计的知识或信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Engineering Education
International Journal of Engineering Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
30.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Engineering Education (IJEE) is an independent, peer-reviewed journal. It has been serving as an international archival forum of scholarly research related to engineering education for over thirty years. The Journal publishes six issues per year. These include, from time to time, special issues on specific engineering education topics. Only manuscripts that have a focus on engineering education will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Immersion Experiences for Biomedical Engineering Undergraduates: Comparing Strategies and Local Partnerships at Two Institutions. Developing systems thinking in a Project-Based Learning environment Role of FCBF Feature Selection Algorithm in Educational Data Mining Development of a Game-Based e-Learning System with Augmented Reality for Improving Students’ Learning Performance THE ANALYSIS IS FOR THE DESIGN OF DIFFERENT CLUB FACE’S THICKNESSES OF FAIRWAY WOOD TO THE CHARACTERISTIC TIME
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1