Efficacy and efficiency of information retrieval of community family physicians at the point of care: exploring the associations with information and computer literacy.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of the Medical Library Association Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.5195/jmla.2023.1539
Jumana Antoun, Jennifer Lapin, Dennis Beck
{"title":"Efficacy and efficiency of information retrieval of community family physicians at the point of care: exploring the associations with information and computer literacy.","authors":"Jumana Antoun,&nbsp;Jennifer Lapin,&nbsp;Dennis Beck","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2023.1539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to measure the association between the efficacy/efficiency of digital information retrieval among community family physicians at the point of care and information and computer literacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a part of a cross-sectional anonymous online survey-based study among community family physicians who reported no affiliation with an academic institution in eight Arab countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 physicians were included. The mean total score for the information literacy scale was 59.8 out of 91 (SD = 11.4). The mean score was 29.3 (SD = 5.6) out of 55 on the computer literacy scale. A one-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant association between information literacy and information retrieval efficacy (F (2,69) = 4.466, p = 0.015) and efficiency of information retrieval (F (2.69) = 4.563, p = 0.014). Computer literacy was not associated with information retrieval efficacy or efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The information and computer literacy scores of community family physicians in eight Arab countries are average. Information literacy, rather than computer literacy, is positively associated with the efficacy and efficiency of information retrieval at the point of care. There is room for improvement in evidence-based medicine curricula and continuous professional development to improve information literacy for better information retrieval and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"111 3","pages":"677-683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10361562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2023.1539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to measure the association between the efficacy/efficiency of digital information retrieval among community family physicians at the point of care and information and computer literacy.

Methods: This study is a part of a cross-sectional anonymous online survey-based study among community family physicians who reported no affiliation with an academic institution in eight Arab countries.

Results: A total of 72 physicians were included. The mean total score for the information literacy scale was 59.8 out of 91 (SD = 11.4). The mean score was 29.3 (SD = 5.6) out of 55 on the computer literacy scale. A one-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant association between information literacy and information retrieval efficacy (F (2,69) = 4.466, p = 0.015) and efficiency of information retrieval (F (2.69) = 4.563, p = 0.014). Computer literacy was not associated with information retrieval efficacy or efficiency.

Conclusion: The information and computer literacy scores of community family physicians in eight Arab countries are average. Information literacy, rather than computer literacy, is positively associated with the efficacy and efficiency of information retrieval at the point of care. There is room for improvement in evidence-based medicine curricula and continuous professional development to improve information literacy for better information retrieval and patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区家庭医生在护理点的信息检索效能与效率:探讨信息与计算机素养的关系。
目的:本研究旨在探讨社区家庭医生在护理点使用数字信息检索的效果/效率与信息和计算机素养的关系。方法:本研究是一项横断面匿名在线调查研究的一部分,在八个阿拉伯国家的社区家庭医生中报告没有隶属于学术机构。结果:共纳入72名医生。信息素养量表的平均总分为59.8分(SD = 11.4)。在计算机能力量表上,平均得分为29.3分(SD = 5.6)。单因素方差分析显示,信息素养与信息检索效能(F (2,69) = 4.466, p = 0.015)和信息检索效率(F (2.69) = 4.563, p = 0.014)之间存在显著相关。计算机素养与信息检索效能或效率无关。结论:8个阿拉伯国家社区家庭医生的信息和计算机素养得分处于平均水平。信息素养,而不是计算机素养,与护理点信息检索的功效和效率呈正相关。在循证医学课程和持续的专业发展方面有改进的空间,以提高信息素养,以便更好地检索信息和护理病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Journal of the Medical Library Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly that aims to advance the practice and research knowledgebase of health sciences librarianship. The most current impact factor for the JMLA (from the 2007 edition of Journal Citation Reports) is 1.392.
期刊最新文献
A community engagement program to improve awareness for credible online health information. Consulting with an embedded librarian: student perceptions on the value of required research meetings. Designing a framework for curriculum building in systematic review competencies for librarians: a case report. History in context: teaching the history of dentistry with rare materials. MLA Research Training Institute (RTI) 2018 and 2019: participant research confidence and program effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1