Quality of vital event data for infant mortality estimation in prospective, population-based studies: an analysis of secondary data from Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Population Health Metrics Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1186/s12963-023-00309-7
Daniel J Erchick, Seema Subedi, Andrea Verhulst, Michel Guillot, Linda S Adair, Aluísio J D Barros, Bernard Chasekwa, Parul Christian, Bruna Gonçalves C da Silva, Mariângela F Silveira, Pedro C Hallal, Jean H Humphrey, Lieven Huybregts, Simon Kariuki, Subarna K Khatry, Carl Lachat, Alicia Matijasevich, Peter D McElroy, Ana Maria B Menezes, Luke C Mullany, Tita Lorna L Perez, Penelope A Phillips-Howard, Dominique Roberfroid, Iná S Santos, Feiko O Ter Kuile, Thulasiraj D Ravilla, James M Tielsch, Lee S F Wu, Joanne Katz
{"title":"Quality of vital event data for infant mortality estimation in prospective, population-based studies: an analysis of secondary data from Asia, Africa, and Latin America.","authors":"Daniel J Erchick,&nbsp;Seema Subedi,&nbsp;Andrea Verhulst,&nbsp;Michel Guillot,&nbsp;Linda S Adair,&nbsp;Aluísio J D Barros,&nbsp;Bernard Chasekwa,&nbsp;Parul Christian,&nbsp;Bruna Gonçalves C da Silva,&nbsp;Mariângela F Silveira,&nbsp;Pedro C Hallal,&nbsp;Jean H Humphrey,&nbsp;Lieven Huybregts,&nbsp;Simon Kariuki,&nbsp;Subarna K Khatry,&nbsp;Carl Lachat,&nbsp;Alicia Matijasevich,&nbsp;Peter D McElroy,&nbsp;Ana Maria B Menezes,&nbsp;Luke C Mullany,&nbsp;Tita Lorna L Perez,&nbsp;Penelope A Phillips-Howard,&nbsp;Dominique Roberfroid,&nbsp;Iná S Santos,&nbsp;Feiko O Ter Kuile,&nbsp;Thulasiraj D Ravilla,&nbsp;James M Tielsch,&nbsp;Lee S F Wu,&nbsp;Joanne Katz","doi":"10.1186/s12963-023-00309-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infant and neonatal mortality estimates are typically derived from retrospective birth histories collected through surveys in countries with unreliable civil registration and vital statistics systems. Yet such data are subject to biases, including under-reporting of deaths and age misreporting, which impact mortality estimates. Prospective population-based cohort studies are an underutilized data source for mortality estimation that may offer strengths that avoid biases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group, including 11 population-based pregnancy or birth cohort studies, to evaluate the appropriateness of vital event data for mortality estimation. Analyses were descriptive, summarizing study designs, populations, protocols, and internal checks to assess their impact on data quality. We calculated infant and neonatal morality rates and compared patterns with Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies yielded 71,760 pregnant women and 85,095 live births. Specific field protocols, especially pregnancy enrollment, limited exclusion criteria, and frequent follow-up visits after delivery, led to higher birth outcome ascertainment and fewer missing deaths. Most studies had low follow-up loss in pregnancy and the first month with little evidence of date heaping. Among studies in Asia and Latin America, neonatal mortality rates (NMR) were similar to DHS, while several studies in Sub-Saharan Africa had lower NMRs than DHS. Infant mortality varied by study and region between sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prospective, population-based cohort studies following rigorous protocols can yield high-quality vital event data to improve characterization of detailed mortality patterns of infants in low- and middle-income countries, especially in the early neonatal period where mortality risk is highest and changes rapidly.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"21 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10375772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-023-00309-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Infant and neonatal mortality estimates are typically derived from retrospective birth histories collected through surveys in countries with unreliable civil registration and vital statistics systems. Yet such data are subject to biases, including under-reporting of deaths and age misreporting, which impact mortality estimates. Prospective population-based cohort studies are an underutilized data source for mortality estimation that may offer strengths that avoid biases.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group, including 11 population-based pregnancy or birth cohort studies, to evaluate the appropriateness of vital event data for mortality estimation. Analyses were descriptive, summarizing study designs, populations, protocols, and internal checks to assess their impact on data quality. We calculated infant and neonatal morality rates and compared patterns with Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data.

Results: Studies yielded 71,760 pregnant women and 85,095 live births. Specific field protocols, especially pregnancy enrollment, limited exclusion criteria, and frequent follow-up visits after delivery, led to higher birth outcome ascertainment and fewer missing deaths. Most studies had low follow-up loss in pregnancy and the first month with little evidence of date heaping. Among studies in Asia and Latin America, neonatal mortality rates (NMR) were similar to DHS, while several studies in Sub-Saharan Africa had lower NMRs than DHS. Infant mortality varied by study and region between sources.

Conclusions: Prospective, population-based cohort studies following rigorous protocols can yield high-quality vital event data to improve characterization of detailed mortality patterns of infants in low- and middle-income countries, especially in the early neonatal period where mortality risk is highest and changes rapidly.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人群的前瞻性研究中婴儿死亡率估计的生命事件数据质量:来自亚洲、非洲和拉丁美洲的次要数据分析
引言:婴儿和新生儿死亡率估计数通常来源于在民事登记和生命统计系统不可靠的国家通过调查收集的回顾性出生史。然而,这些数据存在偏见,包括死亡报告不足和年龄误报,这会影响死亡率估计。前瞻性的基于人群的队列研究是一种未充分利用的死亡率估计数据来源,可能提供避免偏见的优势。方法:我们对儿童健康流行病学参考组的数据进行了二次分析,包括11项基于人群的妊娠或出生队列研究,以评估生命事件数据用于死亡率估计的适当性。分析是描述性的,总结了研究设计、人群、方案和内部检查,以评估其对数据质量的影响。我们计算了婴儿和新生儿的道德比率,并将模式与人口与健康调查(DHS)数据进行了比较。结果:研究共产生71760名孕妇和85095名活产婴儿。具体的现场方案,特别是妊娠登记、有限的排除标准和产后频繁的随访,导致了更高的出生结果确定率和更少的遗漏死亡。大多数研究在怀孕和第一个月的随访损失很低,几乎没有数据堆积的证据。在亚洲和拉丁美洲的研究中,新生儿死亡率(NMR)与国土安全部相似,而撒哈拉以南非洲的几项研究的新生儿死亡率低于国土安全部。婴儿死亡率因研究和地区而异。结论:遵循严格方案的前瞻性、基于人群的队列研究可以产生高质量的生命事件数据,以改善中低收入国家婴儿详细死亡率模式的特征,尤其是在死亡率最高且变化迅速的新生儿早期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Population Health Metrics
Population Health Metrics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.
期刊最新文献
A new method for estimating recent adult mortality from summary sibling histories. Investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the nutritional status of infants and toddlers: insights from China. Harmonizing measurements: establishing a common metric via shared items across instruments. Examining select sociodemographic characteristics of sub-county geographies for public health surveillance. Deriving disability weights for the Netherlands: findings from the Dutch disability weights measurement study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1