Disparities in Referral Initiation and Completion at an Urban FQHC Look-alike (FQHC-LA) Clinic.

Amanda K Emerson, Dorothy Hughes
{"title":"Disparities in Referral Initiation and Completion at an Urban FQHC Look-alike (FQHC-LA) Clinic.","authors":"Amanda K Emerson,&nbsp;Dorothy Hughes","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol16.19524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine referral initiation and completion disparities across primary care encounters at the Hope Family Care Center (HFCC) in Kansas City, MO, by payor type (primary insurance): private insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected and analyzed for all encounters (N = 4,235) over a 15-month period, including payor type, referral initiation and completion, and demographics. Referral initiation and completion were calculated by payor type and differences analyzed using Chi-square tests and t-tests. Logistic regression examined payor type association with referral initiation and completion, accounting for demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis showed a meaningful difference in rate of referral to specialists by payor type. The Medicaid encounter referral initiation rate was higher than rates for all other payor types (7.4% vs. 5.0%), and self-pay encounters' referral initiation rate was lower than rates for all other payor types (3.8% vs. 6.4%). Using logistic regression, Medicaid encounters had 1.4 greater odds, and self-pay encounters 0.7 greater odds, of initiating a referral compared to private insurance encounters. There was no difference in referral completion by payor type or demographic category.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Equal referral completion rates across payor types suggested HFCC may have had well-established referral resources for patients. Higher referral initiation rates for Medicaid and lower for self-pay may suggest that insurance coverage offered financial confidence when seeking specialist care. Higher odds of Medicaid encounters initiating a referral could imply greater health needs among Medicaid patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"131-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/20/16-131.PMC10241200.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol16.19524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine referral initiation and completion disparities across primary care encounters at the Hope Family Care Center (HFCC) in Kansas City, MO, by payor type (primary insurance): private insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay.

Methods: Data were collected and analyzed for all encounters (N = 4,235) over a 15-month period, including payor type, referral initiation and completion, and demographics. Referral initiation and completion were calculated by payor type and differences analyzed using Chi-square tests and t-tests. Logistic regression examined payor type association with referral initiation and completion, accounting for demographic variables.

Results: Our analysis showed a meaningful difference in rate of referral to specialists by payor type. The Medicaid encounter referral initiation rate was higher than rates for all other payor types (7.4% vs. 5.0%), and self-pay encounters' referral initiation rate was lower than rates for all other payor types (3.8% vs. 6.4%). Using logistic regression, Medicaid encounters had 1.4 greater odds, and self-pay encounters 0.7 greater odds, of initiating a referral compared to private insurance encounters. There was no difference in referral completion by payor type or demographic category.

Conclusions: Equal referral completion rates across payor types suggested HFCC may have had well-established referral resources for patients. Higher referral initiation rates for Medicaid and lower for self-pay may suggest that insurance coverage offered financial confidence when seeking specialist care. Higher odds of Medicaid encounters initiating a referral could imply greater health needs among Medicaid patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在城市FQHC相似(FQHC- la)诊所转诊开始和完成的差异。
简介:本研究的目的是确定密苏里州堪萨斯城希望家庭护理中心(HFCC)初级保健就诊的转诊开始和完成差异,按付款人类型(主要保险):私人保险,医疗补助,医疗保险和自费。方法:收集并分析15个月期间所有就诊(N = 4,235)的数据,包括付款人类型、转诊开始和完成情况以及人口统计数据。根据付款人类型计算转诊开始和完成情况,并使用卡方检验和t检验分析差异。逻辑回归检验了付款人类型与转诊开始和完成的关联,并考虑了人口统计学变量。结果:我们的分析显示,按付款人类型转诊到专家的比率有意义的差异。医疗补助就诊的转诊起始率高于所有其他付款人类型的转诊起始率(7.4%比5.0%),自费就诊的转诊起始率低于所有其他付款人类型的转诊起始率(3.8%比6.4%)。使用逻辑回归,与私人保险相比,医疗补助遭遇的转诊几率高出1.4,自付遭遇的转诊几率高出0.7。按付款人类型或人口统计学分类,转诊完成情况没有差异。结论:不同付款人类型的转诊完成率相同,表明HFCC可能为患者提供了完善的转诊资源。较高的医疗补助转诊率和较低的自付率可能表明,当寻求专科护理时,保险范围提供了经济信心。较高的医疗补助遇到启动转诊的几率可能意味着医疗补助患者有更大的健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case of Extensive Cholangiocarcinoma Highlighting Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment Evaluating the Long-Term Neurologic Sequelae Among Trauma Patients who Received Flexion-Extension Radiographs Ethical Obligation of Adequate Pain Management in Long Term Care Residents with Dementia Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Robotic Hysterectomy in Endometrial Cancer vs. Non-Cancer Patients A Case Report of Leclercia adecarboxylata Pyogenic Arthritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1