Low Current Intensity Plus an Ineffective Dose of Morphine Affect Conditioning Place Preference Through Different Pathways in the Lateral Habenula.

Elahe Amohashemi, Parham Reisi, Hojjat Allah Alaei
{"title":"Low Current Intensity Plus an Ineffective Dose of Morphine Affect Conditioning Place Preference Through Different Pathways in the Lateral Habenula.","authors":"Elahe Amohashemi,&nbsp;Parham Reisi,&nbsp;Hojjat Allah Alaei","doi":"10.4103/abr.abr_126_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The involvement of lateral habenula and the ineffective dose of morphine on reward-related learning and memory is less well-known. This study looked into the effects of electrical stimulation, GABA<sub>B</sub> receptor blockade, and a combination of both with morphine on conditioned place preference.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this experiment, male rats were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (six rats in each group). A 5-day biased conditioned place preference paradigm was used for the behavioral test. The effects of electrical stimulation and phaclofen plus a low dose of morphine on the acquisition and expression phases were examined during conditioning sessions and before the test phase, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conditioning scores were reduced by antagonist injection during the acquisition phase. Interestingly, different intensities exhibited opposite effects on the acquisition phase. Conditioned place preference scores during the acquisition phase were significantly induced by 25 μA electrical stimulation, while conditioning scores were suppressed by electrical stimulation at 150 μA. Phaclofen (2 μg/rat) combined with high intensity induced aversion during the acquisition phase, while inhibiting expression. In contrast, high intensity with phaclofen (1 μg/rat) inhibited only the acquisition session. However, low intensity during the acquisition phase had an additive effect that was prevented by pretreatment with phaclofen (2 μg/rat), but this response was modified by the antagonist's low dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A behavioral technique called conditioned place preference is frequently used to evaluate learning that is related to rewards. Therefore, lateral habenula electrical stimulation and phaclofen plus morphine could affect place preference through the involvement of the reward system.</p>","PeriodicalId":7225,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Biomedical Research","volume":"12 ","pages":"161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/ee/ABR-12-161.PMC10410425.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/abr.abr_126_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The involvement of lateral habenula and the ineffective dose of morphine on reward-related learning and memory is less well-known. This study looked into the effects of electrical stimulation, GABAB receptor blockade, and a combination of both with morphine on conditioned place preference.

Materials and methods: In this experiment, male rats were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (six rats in each group). A 5-day biased conditioned place preference paradigm was used for the behavioral test. The effects of electrical stimulation and phaclofen plus a low dose of morphine on the acquisition and expression phases were examined during conditioning sessions and before the test phase, respectively.

Results: The conditioning scores were reduced by antagonist injection during the acquisition phase. Interestingly, different intensities exhibited opposite effects on the acquisition phase. Conditioned place preference scores during the acquisition phase were significantly induced by 25 μA electrical stimulation, while conditioning scores were suppressed by electrical stimulation at 150 μA. Phaclofen (2 μg/rat) combined with high intensity induced aversion during the acquisition phase, while inhibiting expression. In contrast, high intensity with phaclofen (1 μg/rat) inhibited only the acquisition session. However, low intensity during the acquisition phase had an additive effect that was prevented by pretreatment with phaclofen (2 μg/rat), but this response was modified by the antagonist's low dose.

Conclusions: A behavioral technique called conditioned place preference is frequently used to evaluate learning that is related to rewards. Therefore, lateral habenula electrical stimulation and phaclofen plus morphine could affect place preference through the involvement of the reward system.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低电流强度加无效剂量吗啡通过外侧缰的不同通路影响条件反射位置偏好。
背景:外侧链的受累和吗啡剂量对奖励相关学习记忆的无效作用尚不清楚。本研究探讨了电刺激、GABAB受体阻断以及两者联合吗啡对条件位置偏好的影响。材料与方法:本实验采用氯胺酮/噻嗪麻醉雄性大鼠,每组6只。行为测试采用5天有偏条件位置偏好范式。在条件反射阶段和测试阶段前分别观察电刺激和苯氯芬加低剂量吗啡对大鼠习得期和表达期的影响。结果:在获得期注射拮抗剂可降低条件反射评分。有趣的是,不同的强度在习得阶段表现出相反的效果。25 μA电刺激显著诱导习得期条件位置偏好得分,而150 μA电刺激抑制习得期条件偏好得分。苯氯芬(2 μg/大鼠)在获得期联合高强度诱导厌恶,同时抑制表达。相比之下,高剂量苯氯芬(1 μg/大鼠)仅抑制习得期。然而,在获取期的低剂量有一种加性效应,用苯氯芬(2 μg/大鼠)预处理可以阻止这种效应,但这种效应被低剂量拮抗剂修饰。结论:一种被称为条件位置偏好的行为技术经常被用来评估与奖励相关的学习。因此,侧缰核电刺激和苯氯芬加吗啡可以通过奖赏系统的参与影响位置偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic Sulfoquinovosyl Glycerols from the Seaweed Sargassum Angustifolium from Persian Gulf Effect of Silybum Marianum on Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity with Cisplatin Evaluation of IP3R3 Gene Silencing Effect on Pyruvate Dehydrogenase (PDH) Enzyme Activity in Breast Cancer Cells with and Without Estrogen Receptor Diagnostic Value of Dermoscopic Structures in Predicting Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Skin of Color The Best Surgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1