高危妊娠中母婴二人关系紊乱的护理诊断风险的临床验证:病例对照研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Knowledge Pub Date : 2023-08-24 DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.12444
Ryanne C. M. G. Mendes PhD, Sheila C. R. V. Morais PhD, Cleide M. Pontes PhD, Cecília M. F. Q. Frazão PhD, Michelline S. França PhD, Marcos V. O. Lopes PhD, Gabrielle P. Silva MSN, Suzana O. Mangueira PhD, Francisca M. P. Linhares PhD
{"title":"高危妊娠中母婴二人关系紊乱的护理诊断风险的临床验证:病例对照研究。","authors":"Ryanne C. M. G. Mendes PhD,&nbsp;Sheila C. R. V. Morais PhD,&nbsp;Cleide M. Pontes PhD,&nbsp;Cecília M. F. Q. Frazão PhD,&nbsp;Michelline S. França PhD,&nbsp;Marcos V. O. Lopes PhD,&nbsp;Gabrielle P. Silva MSN,&nbsp;Suzana O. Mangueira PhD,&nbsp;Francisca M. P. Linhares PhD","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To obtain evidence of the clinical validity of the nursing diagnosis (ND) risk for disturbed maternal–fetal dyad in high-risk pregnancy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Causal validation of the ND through a case–control study performed in a university hospital with 155 high-risk pregnant women: 31 cases and 124 controls. A causal association was found between the ND etiological factors and the occurrence of disruption of the symbiotic maternal–fetal dyad; an association was verified when the etiological factor presented a <i>p</i>-value &lt;0.05 and odds ratio &gt;1.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The risk factor absent–inadequate prenatal care; populations at risk, such as young-advanced maternal age and economically disadvantaged pregnant women; and association conditions, such as maternal conditions and compromised fetal oxygen transport, increased the outcome likelihood. The associated condition maternal illnesses appeared as a protective factor.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Evidence of clinical validity of the ND risk for disturbed maternal–fetal dyad was obtained, and an association between etiological factors and disruption of the symbiotic maternal–fetal dyad was found.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for nursing practice</h3>\n \n <p>The results contribute to advance scientific knowledge in nursing teaching, research, and practice and support the nursing process in high-risk pregnancies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":"35 3","pages":"281-289"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis risk for disturbed maternal–fetal dyad in high-risk pregnancy: A case–control study\",\"authors\":\"Ryanne C. M. G. Mendes PhD,&nbsp;Sheila C. R. V. Morais PhD,&nbsp;Cleide M. Pontes PhD,&nbsp;Cecília M. F. Q. Frazão PhD,&nbsp;Michelline S. França PhD,&nbsp;Marcos V. O. Lopes PhD,&nbsp;Gabrielle P. Silva MSN,&nbsp;Suzana O. Mangueira PhD,&nbsp;Francisca M. P. Linhares PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/2047-3095.12444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To obtain evidence of the clinical validity of the nursing diagnosis (ND) risk for disturbed maternal–fetal dyad in high-risk pregnancy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Causal validation of the ND through a case–control study performed in a university hospital with 155 high-risk pregnant women: 31 cases and 124 controls. A causal association was found between the ND etiological factors and the occurrence of disruption of the symbiotic maternal–fetal dyad; an association was verified when the etiological factor presented a <i>p</i>-value &lt;0.05 and odds ratio &gt;1.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>The risk factor absent–inadequate prenatal care; populations at risk, such as young-advanced maternal age and economically disadvantaged pregnant women; and association conditions, such as maternal conditions and compromised fetal oxygen transport, increased the outcome likelihood. The associated condition maternal illnesses appeared as a protective factor.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Evidence of clinical validity of the ND risk for disturbed maternal–fetal dyad was obtained, and an association between etiological factors and disruption of the symbiotic maternal–fetal dyad was found.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implications for nursing practice</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results contribute to advance scientific knowledge in nursing teaching, research, and practice and support the nursing process in high-risk pregnancies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"281-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2047-3095.12444\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2047-3095.12444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:证明护理诊断(ND)对高危妊娠母胎关系紊乱风险的临床有效性:方法:在一家大学医院对 155 名高危孕妇(31 例病例和 124 例对照)进行病例对照研究,对 ND 进行因果验证。研究发现,玖玖病的病因与母胎共生关系的破坏之间存在因果关系;当病因的 p 值为 1 时,相关性得到验证:不存在的风险因素--产前护理不足;高危人群,如年轻高龄产妇和经济状况不佳的孕妇;以及关联条件,如产妇病情和胎儿氧运输受损,都增加了结果的可能性。相关的孕产妇疾病似乎是一个保护因素:结论:该研究获得了母胎二元共生关系紊乱玖玖风险临床有效性的证据,并发现了病因因素与母胎共生关系紊乱之间的关联:研究结果有助于促进护理教学、研究和实践中的科学知识,并支持高危妊娠的护理过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis risk for disturbed maternal–fetal dyad in high-risk pregnancy: A case–control study

Purpose

To obtain evidence of the clinical validity of the nursing diagnosis (ND) risk for disturbed maternal–fetal dyad in high-risk pregnancy.

Method

Causal validation of the ND through a case–control study performed in a university hospital with 155 high-risk pregnant women: 31 cases and 124 controls. A causal association was found between the ND etiological factors and the occurrence of disruption of the symbiotic maternal–fetal dyad; an association was verified when the etiological factor presented a p-value <0.05 and odds ratio >1.

Findings

The risk factor absent–inadequate prenatal care; populations at risk, such as young-advanced maternal age and economically disadvantaged pregnant women; and association conditions, such as maternal conditions and compromised fetal oxygen transport, increased the outcome likelihood. The associated condition maternal illnesses appeared as a protective factor.

Conclusions

Evidence of clinical validity of the ND risk for disturbed maternal–fetal dyad was obtained, and an association between etiological factors and disruption of the symbiotic maternal–fetal dyad was found.

Implications for nursing practice

The results contribute to advance scientific knowledge in nursing teaching, research, and practice and support the nursing process in high-risk pregnancies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of nursing diagnoses identified at admission and discharge of patients with decompensated heart failure. Evidence of content validity of the "Blood Transfusion Reaction" (code 0700) nursing outcome from the nursing outcomes classification. Evaluating the accuracy of impaired skin integrity in critically ill patients: Key characteristics and clinical implications. Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis inadequate social support network in breastfeeding mothers: A cross-sectional study. The prevalence of self-neglect among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1