一个直观的框架贝叶斯后验模拟方法

Razieh Bidhendi Yarandi , Mohammad Ali Mansournia , Hojjat Zeraati , Kazem Mohammad
{"title":"一个直观的框架贝叶斯后验模拟方法","authors":"Razieh Bidhendi Yarandi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Mansournia ,&nbsp;Hojjat Zeraati ,&nbsp;Kazem Mohammad","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2021.100060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Bayesian inference has become popular. It offers several pragmatic approaches to account for uncertainty in inference decision-making. Various estimation methods have been introduced to implement Bayesian methods. Although these algorithms are powerful, they are not always easy to grasp for non-statisticians. This paper aims to provide an intuitive framework of four essential Bayesian computational methods for epidemiologists and other health researchers. We do not cover an extensive mathematical discussion of these approaches, but instead offer a non-quantitative description of these algorithms and provide some illuminating examples.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Bayesian computational methods, namely importance sampling, rejection sampling, Markov chain Monte Carlo, and data augmentation are presented.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>The substantial amount of research published on Bayesian inference has highlighted its popularity among researchers, while the basic concepts are not always straightforward for interested learners. We show that alternative approaches such as a weighted prior approach, which are intuitively appealing and easy-to-understand, work well in the case of low-dimensional problems and appropriate prior information. Otherwise, MCMC is a trouble-free tool in those cases.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gloepi.2021.100060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An intuitive framework for Bayesian posterior simulation methods\",\"authors\":\"Razieh Bidhendi Yarandi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Ali Mansournia ,&nbsp;Hojjat Zeraati ,&nbsp;Kazem Mohammad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloepi.2021.100060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Bayesian inference has become popular. It offers several pragmatic approaches to account for uncertainty in inference decision-making. Various estimation methods have been introduced to implement Bayesian methods. Although these algorithms are powerful, they are not always easy to grasp for non-statisticians. This paper aims to provide an intuitive framework of four essential Bayesian computational methods for epidemiologists and other health researchers. We do not cover an extensive mathematical discussion of these approaches, but instead offer a non-quantitative description of these algorithms and provide some illuminating examples.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Bayesian computational methods, namely importance sampling, rejection sampling, Markov chain Monte Carlo, and data augmentation are presented.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>The substantial amount of research published on Bayesian inference has highlighted its popularity among researchers, while the basic concepts are not always straightforward for interested learners. We show that alternative approaches such as a weighted prior approach, which are intuitively appealing and easy-to-understand, work well in the case of low-dimensional problems and appropriate prior information. Otherwise, MCMC is a trouble-free tool in those cases.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gloepi.2021.100060\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113321000146\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113321000146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的贝叶斯推理已经变得很流行。它提供了几种实用的方法来解释推理决策中的不确定性。为了实现贝叶斯方法,已经引入了各种各样的估计方法。尽管这些算法很强大,但对于非统计学家来说,它们并不总是很容易掌握。本文旨在为流行病学家和其他健康研究人员提供四种基本贝叶斯计算方法的直观框架。我们不会对这些方法进行广泛的数学讨论,而是对这些算法进行非定量的描述,并提供一些有启发性的例子。材料和方法介绍了贝叶斯计算方法,即重要抽样、拒绝抽样、马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗和数据增强。结果和结论发表的大量关于贝叶斯推理的研究突出了它在研究人员中的受欢迎程度,然而对感兴趣的学习者来说,基本概念并不总是直截了当的。我们证明了替代方法,如加权先验方法,直观地吸引人,易于理解,在低维问题和适当的先验信息的情况下工作得很好。否则,在这些情况下,MCMC是一个无故障的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An intuitive framework for Bayesian posterior simulation methods

Purpose

Bayesian inference has become popular. It offers several pragmatic approaches to account for uncertainty in inference decision-making. Various estimation methods have been introduced to implement Bayesian methods. Although these algorithms are powerful, they are not always easy to grasp for non-statisticians. This paper aims to provide an intuitive framework of four essential Bayesian computational methods for epidemiologists and other health researchers. We do not cover an extensive mathematical discussion of these approaches, but instead offer a non-quantitative description of these algorithms and provide some illuminating examples.

Materials and methods

Bayesian computational methods, namely importance sampling, rejection sampling, Markov chain Monte Carlo, and data augmentation are presented.

Results and conclusions

The substantial amount of research published on Bayesian inference has highlighted its popularity among researchers, while the basic concepts are not always straightforward for interested learners. We show that alternative approaches such as a weighted prior approach, which are intuitively appealing and easy-to-understand, work well in the case of low-dimensional problems and appropriate prior information. Otherwise, MCMC is a trouble-free tool in those cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Epidemiology
Global Epidemiology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
39 days
期刊最新文献
A note on handling conditional missing values Tailored guidance to apply the Estimand framework to Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) studies Improving the timeliness of birth registration in Fiji through a financial incentive Predicting adolescent psychopathology from early life factors: A machine learning tutorial Challenging unverified assumptions in causal claims: Do gas stoves increase risk of pediatric asthma?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1