释放人工智能的潜力:深入研究用于医学研究的GPT提示。

IF 4.1 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Health & Care Informatics Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100857
Dorian Garin
{"title":"释放人工智能的潜力:深入研究用于医学研究的GPT提示。","authors":"Dorian Garin","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Reuse permitted under CC BYNC. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. I read the article by Haemmerli et al on the performance of ChatGPT3.5 in generating treatment recommendations for central nervous system (CNS) tumours, which were then evaluated by tumour board (TB) experts. While the study did illuminate promising aspects of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) model, the design of the prompt used to interact with ChatGPT warrants further consideration. In the study, the prompt employed was a brief patient history, followed by two questions, which appears to have limited the model’s performance. As a sophisticated large language model (LLM), GPT3.5 relies heavily on the context and specificity of the provided prompt. 2 Based on cited literature, an alternative prompt structure could have included context, specific intent, a question and an expected response format. Moreover, pretraining the LLM with examples of the expected answer significantly improves the quality of the answer. 3 Finally, the introduction of GPT4 in early March 2023 has shown considerable improvement in understanding and generating responses when compared with ChatGPT3.5. 5","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/ca/bmjhci-2023-100857.PMC10462930.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unleashing the potential of AI: a deeper dive into GPT prompts for medical research.\",\"authors\":\"Dorian Garin\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Reuse permitted under CC BYNC. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. I read the article by Haemmerli et al on the performance of ChatGPT3.5 in generating treatment recommendations for central nervous system (CNS) tumours, which were then evaluated by tumour board (TB) experts. While the study did illuminate promising aspects of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) model, the design of the prompt used to interact with ChatGPT warrants further consideration. In the study, the prompt employed was a brief patient history, followed by two questions, which appears to have limited the model’s performance. As a sophisticated large language model (LLM), GPT3.5 relies heavily on the context and specificity of the provided prompt. 2 Based on cited literature, an alternative prompt structure could have included context, specific intent, a question and an expected response format. Moreover, pretraining the LLM with examples of the expected answer significantly improves the quality of the answer. 3 Finally, the introduction of GPT4 in early March 2023 has shown considerable improvement in understanding and generating responses when compared with ChatGPT3.5. 5\",\"PeriodicalId\":9050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Health & Care Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/47/ca/bmjhci-2023-100857.PMC10462930.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Health & Care Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100857\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unleashing the potential of AI: a deeper dive into GPT prompts for medical research.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Reuse permitted under CC BYNC. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. I read the article by Haemmerli et al on the performance of ChatGPT3.5 in generating treatment recommendations for central nervous system (CNS) tumours, which were then evaluated by tumour board (TB) experts. While the study did illuminate promising aspects of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) model, the design of the prompt used to interact with ChatGPT warrants further consideration. In the study, the prompt employed was a brief patient history, followed by two questions, which appears to have limited the model’s performance. As a sophisticated large language model (LLM), GPT3.5 relies heavily on the context and specificity of the provided prompt. 2 Based on cited literature, an alternative prompt structure could have included context, specific intent, a question and an expected response format. Moreover, pretraining the LLM with examples of the expected answer significantly improves the quality of the answer. 3 Finally, the introduction of GPT4 in early March 2023 has shown considerable improvement in understanding and generating responses when compared with ChatGPT3.5. 5
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scaling equitable artificial intelligence in healthcare with machine learning operations. Understanding prescribing errors for system optimisation: the technology-related error mechanism classification. Detection of hypertension from pharyngeal images using deep learning algorithm in primary care settings in Japan. PubMed captures more fine-grained bibliographic data on scientific commentary than Web of Science: a comparative analysis. Method to apply temporal graph analysis on electronic patient record data to explore healthcare professional-patient interaction intensity: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1