玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗和阿非利塞普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的三年疗效:一项比较研究。

IF 2.3 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25158414231195174
Yusuf Berk Akbas, Cengiz Alagoz, Semih Cakmak, Gokhan Demir, Nese Alagoz, Halil Ozgur Artunay
{"title":"玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗和阿非利塞普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的三年疗效:一项比较研究。","authors":"Yusuf Berk Akbas,&nbsp;Cengiz Alagoz,&nbsp;Semih Cakmak,&nbsp;Gokhan Demir,&nbsp;Nese Alagoz,&nbsp;Halil Ozgur Artunay","doi":"10.1177/25158414231195174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of visual deterioration in patients with diabetes mellitus. Various treatment options have been used for DME, including intravitreal injection of steroids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatments in patients with DME.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred three eyes of 235 naïve patients who underwent IVR or IVA treatment for DME followed up to 36 months included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at baseline, year 1, 2 and 3. Primary endpoint of the study was the change in BCVA and CMT each year from baseline and requirement of additional treatment (laser/steroid injection).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 198 eyes in IVR group and 205 eyes in IVA group. The changes in mean BCVA were 0.09 ± 0.32 <i>versus</i> 0.17 ± 0.41 Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (<i>p</i> = 0.042) at year 1, 0.09 ± 0.37 <i>versus</i> 0.12 ± 0.45 logMAR (<i>p</i> = 0.512) at year 2 and 0.13 ± 0.36 <i>versus</i> 0.15 ± 0.48 logMAR (<i>p</i> = 0.824) at year 3 in IVA and IVR groups, respectively. The baseline mean BCVA were lower (<i>p</i> = 0.004) in IVA group. The mean total number of injections was 7.93 ± 3.38 <i>versus</i> 7.42 ± 3.05 (<i>p</i> = 0.112).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At year 1, change in mean BCVA was statistically significantly higher in IVA group; however this difference did not persist at years 2 and 3. Although the mean total number of injections was similar between groups, the requirement for adjuvant steroid treatment was significantly higher in ranibizumab group, which may affect the number of visits and treatment costs. Both ranibizumab and aflibercept treatments achieved a good long-term visual and anatomical response in DME patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":"15 ","pages":"25158414231195174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/23/10.1177_25158414231195174.PMC10464826.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three year outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema: A comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Berk Akbas,&nbsp;Cengiz Alagoz,&nbsp;Semih Cakmak,&nbsp;Gokhan Demir,&nbsp;Nese Alagoz,&nbsp;Halil Ozgur Artunay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25158414231195174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of visual deterioration in patients with diabetes mellitus. Various treatment options have been used for DME, including intravitreal injection of steroids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatments in patients with DME.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred three eyes of 235 naïve patients who underwent IVR or IVA treatment for DME followed up to 36 months included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at baseline, year 1, 2 and 3. Primary endpoint of the study was the change in BCVA and CMT each year from baseline and requirement of additional treatment (laser/steroid injection).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 198 eyes in IVR group and 205 eyes in IVA group. The changes in mean BCVA were 0.09 ± 0.32 <i>versus</i> 0.17 ± 0.41 Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (<i>p</i> = 0.042) at year 1, 0.09 ± 0.37 <i>versus</i> 0.12 ± 0.45 logMAR (<i>p</i> = 0.512) at year 2 and 0.13 ± 0.36 <i>versus</i> 0.15 ± 0.48 logMAR (<i>p</i> = 0.824) at year 3 in IVA and IVR groups, respectively. The baseline mean BCVA were lower (<i>p</i> = 0.004) in IVA group. The mean total number of injections was 7.93 ± 3.38 <i>versus</i> 7.42 ± 3.05 (<i>p</i> = 0.112).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At year 1, change in mean BCVA was statistically significantly higher in IVA group; however this difference did not persist at years 2 and 3. Although the mean total number of injections was similar between groups, the requirement for adjuvant steroid treatment was significantly higher in ranibizumab group, which may affect the number of visits and treatment costs. Both ranibizumab and aflibercept treatments achieved a good long-term visual and anatomical response in DME patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"25158414231195174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/23/10.1177_25158414231195174.PMC10464826.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414231195174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414231195174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)是糖尿病患者视力恶化的最常见原因。DME有多种治疗选择,包括玻璃体内注射类固醇和抗血管内皮生长因子。目的:评估和比较玻璃体内雷尼单抗(IVR)和玻璃体内阿非利塞普(IVA)治疗DME患者的功能和解剖学结果。设计:回顾性研究。方法:采用IVR或IVA治疗DME的235例naïve患者共403只眼,随访36个月。在基线、第1年、第2年和第3年测量最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中央黄斑厚度(CMT)。研究的主要终点是每年BCVA和CMT从基线的变化和额外治疗(激光/类固醇注射)的需求。结果:IVR组198眼,IVA组205眼。IVA组和IVR组在第1年的平均BCVA变化分别为0.09±0.32比0.17±0.41最小分辨角(logMAR)的对数(p = 0.042),第2年为0.09±0.37比0.12±0.45 logMAR (p = 0.512),第3年为0.13±0.36比0.15±0.48 logMAR (p = 0.824)。IVA组基线平均BCVA较低(p = 0.004)。平均总注射次数分别为7.93±3.38次和7.42±3.05次(p = 0.112)。结论:IVA组1年平均BCVA变化显著高于IVA组;然而,这种差异在第2年和第3年并不持续。虽然两组之间的平均总注射次数相似,但雷尼单抗组对辅助类固醇治疗的需求明显更高,这可能会影响就诊次数和治疗费用。雷尼珠单抗和阿非利西普治疗在DME患者中获得了良好的长期视觉和解剖反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Three year outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema: A comparative study.

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of visual deterioration in patients with diabetes mellitus. Various treatment options have been used for DME, including intravitreal injection of steroids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors.

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatments in patients with DME.

Design: Retrospective study.

Methods: Four hundred three eyes of 235 naïve patients who underwent IVR or IVA treatment for DME followed up to 36 months included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at baseline, year 1, 2 and 3. Primary endpoint of the study was the change in BCVA and CMT each year from baseline and requirement of additional treatment (laser/steroid injection).

Results: There were 198 eyes in IVR group and 205 eyes in IVA group. The changes in mean BCVA were 0.09 ± 0.32 versus 0.17 ± 0.41 Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (p = 0.042) at year 1, 0.09 ± 0.37 versus 0.12 ± 0.45 logMAR (p = 0.512) at year 2 and 0.13 ± 0.36 versus 0.15 ± 0.48 logMAR (p = 0.824) at year 3 in IVA and IVR groups, respectively. The baseline mean BCVA were lower (p = 0.004) in IVA group. The mean total number of injections was 7.93 ± 3.38 versus 7.42 ± 3.05 (p = 0.112).

Conclusion: At year 1, change in mean BCVA was statistically significantly higher in IVA group; however this difference did not persist at years 2 and 3. Although the mean total number of injections was similar between groups, the requirement for adjuvant steroid treatment was significantly higher in ranibizumab group, which may affect the number of visits and treatment costs. Both ranibizumab and aflibercept treatments achieved a good long-term visual and anatomical response in DME patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of continuous blanket suture for severe recurrent pterygium with symblepharon. The experiences of visually impaired military veterans with Charles Bonnet syndrome. Are depression, anxiety and loneliness associated with visual hallucinations in younger adults with Charles Bonnet syndrome? Clinical characteristics of allergic conjunctivitis in the Southern region of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Optical coherence tomography angiography to assess for retinal vascular changes in Neuro-Sjögren.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1