Yusuf Berk Akbas, Cengiz Alagoz, Semih Cakmak, Gokhan Demir, Nese Alagoz, Halil Ozgur Artunay
{"title":"玻璃体内注射雷尼单抗和阿非利塞普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的三年疗效:一项比较研究。","authors":"Yusuf Berk Akbas, Cengiz Alagoz, Semih Cakmak, Gokhan Demir, Nese Alagoz, Halil Ozgur Artunay","doi":"10.1177/25158414231195174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of visual deterioration in patients with diabetes mellitus. Various treatment options have been used for DME, including intravitreal injection of steroids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatments in patients with DME.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred three eyes of 235 naïve patients who underwent IVR or IVA treatment for DME followed up to 36 months included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at baseline, year 1, 2 and 3. Primary endpoint of the study was the change in BCVA and CMT each year from baseline and requirement of additional treatment (laser/steroid injection).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 198 eyes in IVR group and 205 eyes in IVA group. The changes in mean BCVA were 0.09 ± 0.32 <i>versus</i> 0.17 ± 0.41 Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (<i>p</i> = 0.042) at year 1, 0.09 ± 0.37 <i>versus</i> 0.12 ± 0.45 logMAR (<i>p</i> = 0.512) at year 2 and 0.13 ± 0.36 <i>versus</i> 0.15 ± 0.48 logMAR (<i>p</i> = 0.824) at year 3 in IVA and IVR groups, respectively. The baseline mean BCVA were lower (<i>p</i> = 0.004) in IVA group. The mean total number of injections was 7.93 ± 3.38 <i>versus</i> 7.42 ± 3.05 (<i>p</i> = 0.112).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At year 1, change in mean BCVA was statistically significantly higher in IVA group; however this difference did not persist at years 2 and 3. Although the mean total number of injections was similar between groups, the requirement for adjuvant steroid treatment was significantly higher in ranibizumab group, which may affect the number of visits and treatment costs. Both ranibizumab and aflibercept treatments achieved a good long-term visual and anatomical response in DME patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23054,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","volume":"15 ","pages":"25158414231195174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/23/10.1177_25158414231195174.PMC10464826.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three year outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema: A comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Berk Akbas, Cengiz Alagoz, Semih Cakmak, Gokhan Demir, Nese Alagoz, Halil Ozgur Artunay\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25158414231195174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of visual deterioration in patients with diabetes mellitus. Various treatment options have been used for DME, including intravitreal injection of steroids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatments in patients with DME.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred three eyes of 235 naïve patients who underwent IVR or IVA treatment for DME followed up to 36 months included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at baseline, year 1, 2 and 3. Primary endpoint of the study was the change in BCVA and CMT each year from baseline and requirement of additional treatment (laser/steroid injection).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 198 eyes in IVR group and 205 eyes in IVA group. The changes in mean BCVA were 0.09 ± 0.32 <i>versus</i> 0.17 ± 0.41 Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (<i>p</i> = 0.042) at year 1, 0.09 ± 0.37 <i>versus</i> 0.12 ± 0.45 logMAR (<i>p</i> = 0.512) at year 2 and 0.13 ± 0.36 <i>versus</i> 0.15 ± 0.48 logMAR (<i>p</i> = 0.824) at year 3 in IVA and IVR groups, respectively. The baseline mean BCVA were lower (<i>p</i> = 0.004) in IVA group. The mean total number of injections was 7.93 ± 3.38 <i>versus</i> 7.42 ± 3.05 (<i>p</i> = 0.112).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At year 1, change in mean BCVA was statistically significantly higher in IVA group; however this difference did not persist at years 2 and 3. Although the mean total number of injections was similar between groups, the requirement for adjuvant steroid treatment was significantly higher in ranibizumab group, which may affect the number of visits and treatment costs. Both ranibizumab and aflibercept treatments achieved a good long-term visual and anatomical response in DME patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"25158414231195174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/26/23/10.1177_25158414231195174.PMC10464826.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414231195174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25158414231195174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Three year outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema: A comparative study.
Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of visual deterioration in patients with diabetes mellitus. Various treatment options have been used for DME, including intravitreal injection of steroids and anti-vascular endothelial growth factors.
Objectives: To evaluate and compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) treatments in patients with DME.
Design: Retrospective study.
Methods: Four hundred three eyes of 235 naïve patients who underwent IVR or IVA treatment for DME followed up to 36 months included in the study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at baseline, year 1, 2 and 3. Primary endpoint of the study was the change in BCVA and CMT each year from baseline and requirement of additional treatment (laser/steroid injection).
Results: There were 198 eyes in IVR group and 205 eyes in IVA group. The changes in mean BCVA were 0.09 ± 0.32 versus 0.17 ± 0.41 Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (p = 0.042) at year 1, 0.09 ± 0.37 versus 0.12 ± 0.45 logMAR (p = 0.512) at year 2 and 0.13 ± 0.36 versus 0.15 ± 0.48 logMAR (p = 0.824) at year 3 in IVA and IVR groups, respectively. The baseline mean BCVA were lower (p = 0.004) in IVA group. The mean total number of injections was 7.93 ± 3.38 versus 7.42 ± 3.05 (p = 0.112).
Conclusion: At year 1, change in mean BCVA was statistically significantly higher in IVA group; however this difference did not persist at years 2 and 3. Although the mean total number of injections was similar between groups, the requirement for adjuvant steroid treatment was significantly higher in ranibizumab group, which may affect the number of visits and treatment costs. Both ranibizumab and aflibercept treatments achieved a good long-term visual and anatomical response in DME patients.