烟草研究中的因果推论:公共卫生挑战。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Addictive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI:10.1080/10550887.2023.2252305
Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan, Kenneth D Ward, Paul T Harrell, Ziyad Ben Taleb
{"title":"烟草研究中的因果推论:公共卫生挑战。","authors":"Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan, Kenneth D Ward, Paul T Harrell, Ziyad Ben Taleb","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2023.2252305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Causal inference represents a rapidly expanding interdisciplinary subfield that involves various assumptions, study designs, and estimation strategies, allowing researchers to establish causal relationships from both clinical trials and observational data. In tobacco research, numerous studies address causal questions, including the contentious issue of whether vaping in nonsmoking youth leads to smoking initiation, known as the \"gateway effect.\" Determining the effectiveness and safety of many health interventions will continue to rely on observational [mainly longitudinal] data because randomized trials are not always feasible, ethical, or timely. Therefore, review articles that are synthesizing evidence on the gateway effects of electronic nicotine delivery systems [ENDS] on subsequent cigarette smoking must also consider observational studies as first-rate evidence that can help bring together the polarized tobacco research community and help better understand the \"gateway effect.\" In addition, this will help ongoing efforts to rigorously prevent ENDS use by youth while expanding the cessation potential of ENDS among adult established smokers who are unwilling to quit otherwise. In this commentary, we discuss causal inference tobacco research as one of the public health challenges and provide some recommendations/implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"582-585"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal inference in tobacco research: a public health challenge.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan, Kenneth D Ward, Paul T Harrell, Ziyad Ben Taleb\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10550887.2023.2252305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Causal inference represents a rapidly expanding interdisciplinary subfield that involves various assumptions, study designs, and estimation strategies, allowing researchers to establish causal relationships from both clinical trials and observational data. In tobacco research, numerous studies address causal questions, including the contentious issue of whether vaping in nonsmoking youth leads to smoking initiation, known as the \\\"gateway effect.\\\" Determining the effectiveness and safety of many health interventions will continue to rely on observational [mainly longitudinal] data because randomized trials are not always feasible, ethical, or timely. Therefore, review articles that are synthesizing evidence on the gateway effects of electronic nicotine delivery systems [ENDS] on subsequent cigarette smoking must also consider observational studies as first-rate evidence that can help bring together the polarized tobacco research community and help better understand the \\\"gateway effect.\\\" In addition, this will help ongoing efforts to rigorously prevent ENDS use by youth while expanding the cessation potential of ENDS among adult established smokers who are unwilling to quit otherwise. In this commentary, we discuss causal inference tobacco research as one of the public health challenges and provide some recommendations/implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Addictive Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"582-585\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Addictive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2252305\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2252305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

因果推论是一个迅速扩展的跨学科子领域,它涉及各种假设、研究设计和估算策略,使研究人员能够从临床试验和观察数据中建立因果关系。在烟草研究中,许多研究都涉及因果问题,其中包括一个有争议的问题:不吸烟的青少年吸食电子烟是否会导致他们开始吸烟,即所谓的 "网关效应"。确定许多健康干预措施的有效性和安全性将继续依赖于观察[主要是纵向]数据,因为随机试验并不总是可行的、符合伦理道德的或及时的。因此,综述电子尼古丁释放系统[ENDS]对后续吸烟的 "门径效应 "证据的综述文章也必须考虑观察性研究,将其作为有助于将两极分化的烟草研究界团结起来并帮助更好地理解 "门径效应 "的一流证据。此外,这将有助于当前严格防止青少年使用ENDS的努力,同时扩大ENDS在不愿以其他方式戒烟的成年老烟民中的戒烟潜力。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了作为公共卫生挑战之一的因果推论烟草研究,并提出了一些建议/启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causal inference in tobacco research: a public health challenge.

Causal inference represents a rapidly expanding interdisciplinary subfield that involves various assumptions, study designs, and estimation strategies, allowing researchers to establish causal relationships from both clinical trials and observational data. In tobacco research, numerous studies address causal questions, including the contentious issue of whether vaping in nonsmoking youth leads to smoking initiation, known as the "gateway effect." Determining the effectiveness and safety of many health interventions will continue to rely on observational [mainly longitudinal] data because randomized trials are not always feasible, ethical, or timely. Therefore, review articles that are synthesizing evidence on the gateway effects of electronic nicotine delivery systems [ENDS] on subsequent cigarette smoking must also consider observational studies as first-rate evidence that can help bring together the polarized tobacco research community and help better understand the "gateway effect." In addition, this will help ongoing efforts to rigorously prevent ENDS use by youth while expanding the cessation potential of ENDS among adult established smokers who are unwilling to quit otherwise. In this commentary, we discuss causal inference tobacco research as one of the public health challenges and provide some recommendations/implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
"Smoker" and "Vaper" identity in people who use both cigarettes and E-cigarettes: Changes over time and associations with smoking behaviors. Cannabis flower, concentrates, and edibles: a narrative review comparing prevalence of use, methods of consumption, and cannabis use disorder outcomes. A mixed-method exploration of #vapingcessation videos on TikTok. Buprenorphine prescription and treatment initiation through preemptive outreach and telehealth consultation with emergency medicine providers. Co-occurring pain and addiction: prognostic implications for healthcare professionals in residential treatment for substance use disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1