异丙嗪在伴有和不伴有哮喘的严重慢性阻塞性肺病患者中的镇静抗组胺治疗:一项全国性登记研究中的死亡和严重恶化

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2023.2250604
Barbara Bonnesen, Valdemar Rømer, Sidse Graff Jensen, Jon Torgny Wilcke, Julie Janner, Jens Bak, Sofie Johansson, Christian B Laursen, Lars Pedersen, Josefin Eklof, Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen
{"title":"异丙嗪在伴有和不伴有哮喘的严重慢性阻塞性肺病患者中的镇静抗组胺治疗:一项全国性登记研究中的死亡和严重恶化","authors":"Barbara Bonnesen,&nbsp;Valdemar Rømer,&nbsp;Sidse Graff Jensen,&nbsp;Jon Torgny Wilcke,&nbsp;Julie Janner,&nbsp;Jens Bak,&nbsp;Sofie Johansson,&nbsp;Christian B Laursen,&nbsp;Lars Pedersen,&nbsp;Josefin Eklof,&nbsp;Pradeesh Sivapalan,&nbsp;Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2023.2250604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedating antihistamines such as promethazine are used as anxiolytics and hypnotic agents for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with and without asthma despite limited knowledge of its effects and side effects. We evaluated if treatment with promethazine had a lower risk of harmful outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationwide retrospective cohort study of Danish specialist diagnosed outpatients with COPD treated with promethazine or an active comparator (melatonin). Patients with collection of promethazine or melatonin were propensity score matched 1:1. The primary outcome was a composite of severe COPD exacerbations and death from all causes analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression. We performed an interaction analysis for comorbid asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our registry of 56,523 patients with COPD, 5,661 collected promethazine (<i>n</i> = 3,723) or melatonin (<i>n</i> = 1,938). A cohort of 3,290 promethazine- or melatonin-treated patients matched 1:1 was available for the primary analysis.Within 1-year patients treated with promethazine were at higher risk of the primary outcome than matched controls with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 1.42 (CI 1.27-1.58, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Similarly, the risk of death was higher for promethazine-treated patients (HR 1.53, CI 1.32-1.77, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). An interaction analysis for comorbid asthma showed no interaction between comorbid asthma and the likelihood of a primary outcome when collecting promethazine (<i>p</i> = 0.19). Adjusted Cox analysis on the entire population indicated a further increased risk with more promethazine (HR for primary outcome among patients collecting ≥ 400 promethazine tablets/year=2.15, CI 1.94-2.38, <i>p</i><0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Promethazine-treated patients with COPD had a concerning excess risk of a composite outcome of severe exacerbations and death from all causes compared to melatonin.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"2250604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/da/ZECR_10_2250604.PMC10481760.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedating antihistamine treatment with promethazine in patients with severe COPD with and without asthma: death and severe exacerbations in a nationwide register study.\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Bonnesen,&nbsp;Valdemar Rømer,&nbsp;Sidse Graff Jensen,&nbsp;Jon Torgny Wilcke,&nbsp;Julie Janner,&nbsp;Jens Bak,&nbsp;Sofie Johansson,&nbsp;Christian B Laursen,&nbsp;Lars Pedersen,&nbsp;Josefin Eklof,&nbsp;Pradeesh Sivapalan,&nbsp;Jens-Ulrik Stæhr Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20018525.2023.2250604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedating antihistamines such as promethazine are used as anxiolytics and hypnotic agents for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with and without asthma despite limited knowledge of its effects and side effects. We evaluated if treatment with promethazine had a lower risk of harmful outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationwide retrospective cohort study of Danish specialist diagnosed outpatients with COPD treated with promethazine or an active comparator (melatonin). Patients with collection of promethazine or melatonin were propensity score matched 1:1. The primary outcome was a composite of severe COPD exacerbations and death from all causes analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression. We performed an interaction analysis for comorbid asthma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our registry of 56,523 patients with COPD, 5,661 collected promethazine (<i>n</i> = 3,723) or melatonin (<i>n</i> = 1,938). A cohort of 3,290 promethazine- or melatonin-treated patients matched 1:1 was available for the primary analysis.Within 1-year patients treated with promethazine were at higher risk of the primary outcome than matched controls with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 1.42 (CI 1.27-1.58, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Similarly, the risk of death was higher for promethazine-treated patients (HR 1.53, CI 1.32-1.77, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). An interaction analysis for comorbid asthma showed no interaction between comorbid asthma and the likelihood of a primary outcome when collecting promethazine (<i>p</i> = 0.19). Adjusted Cox analysis on the entire population indicated a further increased risk with more promethazine (HR for primary outcome among patients collecting ≥ 400 promethazine tablets/year=2.15, CI 1.94-2.38, <i>p</i><0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Promethazine-treated patients with COPD had a concerning excess risk of a composite outcome of severe exacerbations and death from all causes compared to melatonin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"2250604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/da/ZECR_10_2250604.PMC10481760.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Clinical Respiratory Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2250604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2023.2250604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:镇静抗组胺药如异丙嗪被用作慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)伴或不伴哮喘患者的抗焦虑药和催眠药,尽管对其作用和副作用的了解有限。我们评估异丙嗪治疗是否有较低的有害后果风险。方法:在全国范围内对丹麦专家诊断的门诊COPD患者进行回顾性队列研究,这些患者使用异丙嗪或活性比较物(褪黑激素)治疗。收集异丙嗪或褪黑素的患者倾向评分为1:1匹配。通过Cox比例风险回归分析,主要结局是严重COPD恶化和全因死亡的综合结果。我们对共病哮喘进行了相互作用分析。结果:在56,523例COPD患者的登记中,5,661例收集了异丙嗪(n = 3,723)或褪黑素(n = 1,938)。3,290名异丙嗪或褪黑激素治疗的患者进行了1:1的配对,可用于初步分析。在1年内,异丙嗪治疗的患者发生主要结局的风险高于对照组,风险比(HR)为1.42 (CI 1.27-1.58, p p p = 0.19)。对整个人群进行校正后的Cox分析表明,服用异丙嗪的风险进一步增加(在服用异丙嗪≥400片/年的患者中,主要结局HR =2.15, CI 1.94-2.38)。结论:与褪黑激素相比,异丙嗪治疗的COPD患者存在严重恶化和全因死亡的复合结局风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sedating antihistamine treatment with promethazine in patients with severe COPD with and without asthma: death and severe exacerbations in a nationwide register study.

Background: Sedating antihistamines such as promethazine are used as anxiolytics and hypnotic agents for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with and without asthma despite limited knowledge of its effects and side effects. We evaluated if treatment with promethazine had a lower risk of harmful outcome.

Methods: Nationwide retrospective cohort study of Danish specialist diagnosed outpatients with COPD treated with promethazine or an active comparator (melatonin). Patients with collection of promethazine or melatonin were propensity score matched 1:1. The primary outcome was a composite of severe COPD exacerbations and death from all causes analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression. We performed an interaction analysis for comorbid asthma.

Results: In our registry of 56,523 patients with COPD, 5,661 collected promethazine (n = 3,723) or melatonin (n = 1,938). A cohort of 3,290 promethazine- or melatonin-treated patients matched 1:1 was available for the primary analysis.Within 1-year patients treated with promethazine were at higher risk of the primary outcome than matched controls with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 1.42 (CI 1.27-1.58, p < 0.0001). Similarly, the risk of death was higher for promethazine-treated patients (HR 1.53, CI 1.32-1.77, p < 0.0001). An interaction analysis for comorbid asthma showed no interaction between comorbid asthma and the likelihood of a primary outcome when collecting promethazine (p = 0.19). Adjusted Cox analysis on the entire population indicated a further increased risk with more promethazine (HR for primary outcome among patients collecting ≥ 400 promethazine tablets/year=2.15, CI 1.94-2.38, p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Promethazine-treated patients with COPD had a concerning excess risk of a composite outcome of severe exacerbations and death from all causes compared to melatonin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the self evaluation of breathing questionnaire (SEBQ) into Danish. Factors behind favorable long-term lung cancer survival in Norway compared to Denmark: a retrospective cohort study. Socioeconomic status and emergency department visits in adults with a history of severe childhood asthma: a register-based study. Comorbid allergy and rhinitis and patient-related outcomes in asthma and COPD: a cross-sectional study. Lung function measurements in the Greenlandic Inuit population: results from the Greenlandic health survey 2017-2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1