利益相关者在不断发展的欧盟HTA进程中的作用:通过欧洲准入学院的多利益相关者会议前问卷调查产生的见解。

Lauren Van Haesendonck, Jörg Ruof, Thomas Desmet, Walter Van Dyck, Steven Simoens, Isabelle Huys, Rosa Giuliani, Mondher Toumi, Christian Dierks, Juliana Dierks, Antonella Cardone, Francois Houÿez, Mira Pavlovic, Michael Berntgen, Peter G M Mol, Anja Schiel, Wim Goettsch, Fabrizio Gianfrate, Stefano Capri, James Ryan, Pierre Ducournau, Oriol Solà-Morales, Elaine Julian
{"title":"利益相关者在不断发展的欧盟HTA进程中的作用:通过欧洲准入学院的多利益相关者会议前问卷调查产生的见解。","authors":"Lauren Van Haesendonck,&nbsp;Jörg Ruof,&nbsp;Thomas Desmet,&nbsp;Walter Van Dyck,&nbsp;Steven Simoens,&nbsp;Isabelle Huys,&nbsp;Rosa Giuliani,&nbsp;Mondher Toumi,&nbsp;Christian Dierks,&nbsp;Juliana Dierks,&nbsp;Antonella Cardone,&nbsp;Francois Houÿez,&nbsp;Mira Pavlovic,&nbsp;Michael Berntgen,&nbsp;Peter G M Mol,&nbsp;Anja Schiel,&nbsp;Wim Goettsch,&nbsp;Fabrizio Gianfrate,&nbsp;Stefano Capri,&nbsp;James Ryan,&nbsp;Pierre Ducournau,&nbsp;Oriol Solà-Morales,&nbsp;Elaine Julian","doi":"10.1080/20016689.2023.2217543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Involvement of all relevant stakeholders will be of utmost importance for the success of the developing EU HTA harmonization process. A multi-step procedure was applied to develop a survey across stakeholders/collaborators within the EU HTA framework to assess their current level of involvement, determine their suggested future role, identify challenges to contribution, and highlight efficient ways to fulfilling their role. The 'key' stakeholder groups identified and covered by this research included: patients', clinicians', regulatory, and Health Technology Developer representatives. The survey was circulated to a wide expert audience including all relevant stakeholder groups in order to determine self-perception by the 'key' stakeholders regarding involvement in the HTA process (self-rating), and in a second, slightly modified version of the questionnaire, to determine the perception of 'key' stakeholder involvement by HTA bodies, payers, and policymakers (external rating). Predefined analyses were conducted on the submitted responses. Fifty-four responses were received (patients 9; clinicians: 8; regulators: 4; HTDs 14; HTA bodies: 7; Payers: 5; policymakers 3; others 4). The mean self-perceived involvement score was consistently lower for each of the 'key' stakeholder groups than the respective external ratings. Based on the qualitative insights generated in the survey, a RACI Chart (Responsible/Accountable/Consulted/Informed) was developed for each of the stakeholder groups to determine their roles and involvement in the current EU HTA process. Our findings suggest extensive effort and a distinct research agenda are required to ensure adequate involvement of the key stakeholder groups in the evolving EU HTA process.</p>","PeriodicalId":73811,"journal":{"name":"Journal of market access & health policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f6/b6/ZJMA_11_2217543.PMC10240997.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of stakeholder involvement in the evolving EU HTA process: <i>Insights generated through the European Access Academy's multi-stakeholder pre-convention questionnaire</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Van Haesendonck,&nbsp;Jörg Ruof,&nbsp;Thomas Desmet,&nbsp;Walter Van Dyck,&nbsp;Steven Simoens,&nbsp;Isabelle Huys,&nbsp;Rosa Giuliani,&nbsp;Mondher Toumi,&nbsp;Christian Dierks,&nbsp;Juliana Dierks,&nbsp;Antonella Cardone,&nbsp;Francois Houÿez,&nbsp;Mira Pavlovic,&nbsp;Michael Berntgen,&nbsp;Peter G M Mol,&nbsp;Anja Schiel,&nbsp;Wim Goettsch,&nbsp;Fabrizio Gianfrate,&nbsp;Stefano Capri,&nbsp;James Ryan,&nbsp;Pierre Ducournau,&nbsp;Oriol Solà-Morales,&nbsp;Elaine Julian\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20016689.2023.2217543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Involvement of all relevant stakeholders will be of utmost importance for the success of the developing EU HTA harmonization process. A multi-step procedure was applied to develop a survey across stakeholders/collaborators within the EU HTA framework to assess their current level of involvement, determine their suggested future role, identify challenges to contribution, and highlight efficient ways to fulfilling their role. The 'key' stakeholder groups identified and covered by this research included: patients', clinicians', regulatory, and Health Technology Developer representatives. The survey was circulated to a wide expert audience including all relevant stakeholder groups in order to determine self-perception by the 'key' stakeholders regarding involvement in the HTA process (self-rating), and in a second, slightly modified version of the questionnaire, to determine the perception of 'key' stakeholder involvement by HTA bodies, payers, and policymakers (external rating). Predefined analyses were conducted on the submitted responses. Fifty-four responses were received (patients 9; clinicians: 8; regulators: 4; HTDs 14; HTA bodies: 7; Payers: 5; policymakers 3; others 4). The mean self-perceived involvement score was consistently lower for each of the 'key' stakeholder groups than the respective external ratings. Based on the qualitative insights generated in the survey, a RACI Chart (Responsible/Accountable/Consulted/Informed) was developed for each of the stakeholder groups to determine their roles and involvement in the current EU HTA process. Our findings suggest extensive effort and a distinct research agenda are required to ensure adequate involvement of the key stakeholder groups in the evolving EU HTA process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f6/b6/ZJMA_11_2217543.PMC10240997.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of market access & health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2217543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of market access & health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20016689.2023.2217543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所有相关利益攸关方的参与对于发展中的欧盟HTA协调进程的成功至关重要。一个多步骤的程序被应用于在欧盟HTA框架内对利益相关者/合作者进行调查,以评估他们目前的参与水平,确定他们建议的未来角色,确定贡献的挑战,并强调履行其角色的有效方法。本研究确定并涵盖的“关键”利益相关者群体包括:患者、临床医生、监管机构和卫生技术开发人员代表。该调查被分发给包括所有相关利益相关者群体在内的广泛专家受众,以确定“关键”利益相关者对HTA过程参与程度的自我感知(自我评级),并在第二份略微修改的问卷中确定HTA机构、付款人和政策制定者对“关键”利益相关者参与程度的感知(外部评级)。对提交的答复进行了预先分析。收到54份回复(患者9例;医生:8;监管机构:4;HTDs 14;HTA机构:7个;纳税人:5;政策制定者3;每个“关键”利益相关者群体的平均自我感知参与得分始终低于各自的外部评级。基于调查中产生的定性见解,为每个利益相关者团体制定了RACI图表(负责/问责/咨询/知情),以确定他们在当前欧盟HTA流程中的角色和参与程度。我们的研究结果表明,需要广泛的努力和明确的研究议程,以确保关键利益相关者群体充分参与不断发展的欧盟HTA进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of stakeholder involvement in the evolving EU HTA process: Insights generated through the European Access Academy's multi-stakeholder pre-convention questionnaire.

Involvement of all relevant stakeholders will be of utmost importance for the success of the developing EU HTA harmonization process. A multi-step procedure was applied to develop a survey across stakeholders/collaborators within the EU HTA framework to assess their current level of involvement, determine their suggested future role, identify challenges to contribution, and highlight efficient ways to fulfilling their role. The 'key' stakeholder groups identified and covered by this research included: patients', clinicians', regulatory, and Health Technology Developer representatives. The survey was circulated to a wide expert audience including all relevant stakeholder groups in order to determine self-perception by the 'key' stakeholders regarding involvement in the HTA process (self-rating), and in a second, slightly modified version of the questionnaire, to determine the perception of 'key' stakeholder involvement by HTA bodies, payers, and policymakers (external rating). Predefined analyses were conducted on the submitted responses. Fifty-four responses were received (patients 9; clinicians: 8; regulators: 4; HTDs 14; HTA bodies: 7; Payers: 5; policymakers 3; others 4). The mean self-perceived involvement score was consistently lower for each of the 'key' stakeholder groups than the respective external ratings. Based on the qualitative insights generated in the survey, a RACI Chart (Responsible/Accountable/Consulted/Informed) was developed for each of the stakeholder groups to determine their roles and involvement in the current EU HTA process. Our findings suggest extensive effort and a distinct research agenda are required to ensure adequate involvement of the key stakeholder groups in the evolving EU HTA process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Knowledge and Application of Economics in Healthcare in a High-Income Country Today: The Case of Belgium. Non-Medical Switching or Discontinuation Patterns among Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the United States: A Claims-Based Analysis. Proposal of a Knowledge Management Model for Complex Systems: Case of the Supervision and Control Subsystem of the Colombian Health System. Adoption of a Societal Perspective in Economic Evaluations of Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Conceptual Paper. Patient Experience and Satisfaction with Orthopedic Services at a Community (Rural) Setting Hospital-How Is It Different from Urban Setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1