利用体感反馈解码视力和视障儿童的空间比例

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2023.100207
Christian Leukel , Timo Leuders , Juliane Leuders
{"title":"利用体感反馈解码视力和视障儿童的空间比例","authors":"Christian Leukel ,&nbsp;Timo Leuders ,&nbsp;Juliane Leuders","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2023.100207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Humans can naturally operate with ratios of continuous magnitudes (proportions). We asked if sighted children (S) and visually impaired children (VI) can discriminate proportions via somatosensory feedback.</p></div><div><h3>Procedures</h3><p>Children formed a proportion by tracing a pair of straight lines with their finger, and compared this proportion with a second proportion resulting from the tracing of another pair of lines.</p></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><p>Performance was 68% in S, thus significantly lower (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) compared to VI (75%). Tracing velocity (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and trial-to-trial variability of tracing velocity (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) was higher in S compared to VI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Operating with proportions solely from somatosensory feedback is possible, thus tracing lines might support learning in mathematics education. Kinematic variables point to the reason for the difference between S and VI, in that higher trial-to-trial variability in velocity in S leads to biased estimation of absolute line lengths.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decoding of spatial proportions using somatosensory feedback in sighted and visually impaired children\",\"authors\":\"Christian Leukel ,&nbsp;Timo Leuders ,&nbsp;Juliane Leuders\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tine.2023.100207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Humans can naturally operate with ratios of continuous magnitudes (proportions). We asked if sighted children (S) and visually impaired children (VI) can discriminate proportions via somatosensory feedback.</p></div><div><h3>Procedures</h3><p>Children formed a proportion by tracing a pair of straight lines with their finger, and compared this proportion with a second proportion resulting from the tracing of another pair of lines.</p></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><p>Performance was 68% in S, thus significantly lower (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) compared to VI (75%). Tracing velocity (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and trial-to-trial variability of tracing velocity (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) was higher in S compared to VI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Operating with proportions solely from somatosensory feedback is possible, thus tracing lines might support learning in mathematics education. Kinematic variables point to the reason for the difference between S and VI, in that higher trial-to-trial variability in velocity in S leads to biased estimation of absolute line lengths.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949323000108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949323000108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的人类可以自然地以连续大小(比例)的比率进行操作。我们询问有视力的儿童(S)和视障儿童(VI)是否可以通过体感反馈来区分比例。程序孩子们用手指画一对直线形成一个比例,并将这个比例与画另一对直线产生的第二个比例进行比较。主要发现S组的表现为68%,因此与VI组(75%)相比显著降低(p<0.001)。与VI相比,S组的追踪速度(p<0.01)和追踪速度的试验间变异性(p<0.05)更高。结论仅根据体感反馈进行比例操作是可能的,因此追踪线可能有助于数学教育中的学习。运动学变量指出了S和VI之间差异的原因,因为S中速度的试验间变化较大,导致对绝对线长度的估计存在偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decoding of spatial proportions using somatosensory feedback in sighted and visually impaired children

Background and purpose

Humans can naturally operate with ratios of continuous magnitudes (proportions). We asked if sighted children (S) and visually impaired children (VI) can discriminate proportions via somatosensory feedback.

Procedures

Children formed a proportion by tracing a pair of straight lines with their finger, and compared this proportion with a second proportion resulting from the tracing of another pair of lines.

Main findings

Performance was 68% in S, thus significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared to VI (75%). Tracing velocity (p < 0.01) and trial-to-trial variability of tracing velocity (p < 0.05) was higher in S compared to VI.

Conclusions

Operating with proportions solely from somatosensory feedback is possible, thus tracing lines might support learning in mathematics education. Kinematic variables point to the reason for the difference between S and VI, in that higher trial-to-trial variability in velocity in S leads to biased estimation of absolute line lengths.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts Mirror invariance in the subsequent acquisition of a script with separate forms for reading and writing Executive functions as predictors of learning prerequisites in preschool: A longitudinal study Integrating vision and somatosensation does not improve the accuracy and response time when estimating area and perimeter of rectangles in primary school The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: Using cognitive profiles to predict academic achievement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1