老年虚弱综合征特征的预后价值:再入院和死亡率结果。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Knowledge Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.12445
María T. Roldán-Chicano PhD, MSc, RN, María M. García-López MSN, RN, María C. Martínez-Pacheco MSc, RN, Javier Rodríguez-Tello MSN, RN
{"title":"老年虚弱综合征特征的预后价值:再入院和死亡率结果。","authors":"María T. Roldán-Chicano PhD, MSc, RN,&nbsp;María M. García-López MSN, RN,&nbsp;María C. Martínez-Pacheco MSc, RN,&nbsp;Javier Rodríguez-Tello MSN, RN","doi":"10.1111/2047-3095.12445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To identify the most relevant clinical characteristics of the nursing diagnosis frail elderly syndrome (FES) in hospitalized patients aged 65 or older and analyze their impact on 9-month mortality and hospital readmission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective and prognostic accuracy study was conducted in patients aged 65 or older, who were admitted to hospital more than 24 h. A consecutive convenience sampling process was used. Assessment included defining characteristics (DCs) of FES, clinical fraility scale (CFS), frail scale (FS), and 9-month mortality and hospital readmission. Statistical tests were used to verify associations between variables. Binary logistic regression analysis and area under the curve were used, to identify significant predictors for the outcomes and evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the DCs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>This study involved 150 patients. CFS scored 65 patients (43.3%, confidence interval 95% 35.2% a 51.6) as frail and proved a prognostic value of mortality at 9 month from pre-frail state (<i>p</i> = 0.020). The mean number of DCs for FES nursing diagnosis was 6.35 (SD = 3.14). Validated tools for measuring frailty were associated with all DCs, excepting nutritional imbalance: below body needs. The hospital readmission during the following 9 months was only statistically related to memory impairment (<i>p</i> = 0.07).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical frailty scale showed good results as a predictor of mortality. The study suggests exploring including it, in clinical manifestations of elderly frail syndrome. This study found that only memory impairment defining characteristic was predictive of hospital readmission. Further research should identify other relevant and prognostic clinical manifestations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implication for nursing practice</h3>\n \n <p>These findings highlight the importance of being vigilant on cognitive decline during hospital admissions. The most prevalent and determinant DCs identified in this study indicate that clinical should focus on preserving functional and mental abilities as well as mobility.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","volume":"35 3","pages":"290-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/2047-3095.12445","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of defining characteristics in frail elderly syndrome: Hospital readmission and mortality outcomes\",\"authors\":\"María T. Roldán-Chicano PhD, MSc, RN,&nbsp;María M. García-López MSN, RN,&nbsp;María C. Martínez-Pacheco MSc, RN,&nbsp;Javier Rodríguez-Tello MSN, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/2047-3095.12445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To identify the most relevant clinical characteristics of the nursing diagnosis frail elderly syndrome (FES) in hospitalized patients aged 65 or older and analyze their impact on 9-month mortality and hospital readmission.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A prospective and prognostic accuracy study was conducted in patients aged 65 or older, who were admitted to hospital more than 24 h. A consecutive convenience sampling process was used. Assessment included defining characteristics (DCs) of FES, clinical fraility scale (CFS), frail scale (FS), and 9-month mortality and hospital readmission. Statistical tests were used to verify associations between variables. Binary logistic regression analysis and area under the curve were used, to identify significant predictors for the outcomes and evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the DCs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study involved 150 patients. CFS scored 65 patients (43.3%, confidence interval 95% 35.2% a 51.6) as frail and proved a prognostic value of mortality at 9 month from pre-frail state (<i>p</i> = 0.020). The mean number of DCs for FES nursing diagnosis was 6.35 (SD = 3.14). Validated tools for measuring frailty were associated with all DCs, excepting nutritional imbalance: below body needs. The hospital readmission during the following 9 months was only statistically related to memory impairment (<i>p</i> = 0.07).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinical frailty scale showed good results as a predictor of mortality. The study suggests exploring including it, in clinical manifestations of elderly frail syndrome. This study found that only memory impairment defining characteristic was predictive of hospital readmission. Further research should identify other relevant and prognostic clinical manifestations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Implication for nursing practice</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings highlight the importance of being vigilant on cognitive decline during hospital admissions. The most prevalent and determinant DCs identified in this study indicate that clinical should focus on preserving functional and mental abilities as well as mobility.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"290-297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/2047-3095.12445\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2047-3095.12445\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/2047-3095.12445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定65岁及以上住院患者中与护理诊断老年虚弱综合征(FES)最相关的临床特征,并分析其对9个月死亡率和再入院率的影响:方法:对入院超过 24 小时的 65 岁及以上患者进行了一项前瞻性和预后准确性研究。评估内容包括FES的定义特征(DCs)、临床虚弱量表(CFS)、虚弱量表(FS)以及9个月的死亡率和再入院率。统计检验用于验证变量之间的关联性。使用二元逻辑回归分析和曲线下面积来确定结果的重要预测因素,并评估 DCs 的预后准确性:这项研究涉及 150 名患者。65 名患者(43.3%,置信区间为 95% 35.2% - 51.6)被 CFS 评定为体弱,并证明了从体弱前状态到 9 个月时的死亡率预后值(p = 0.020)。FES护理诊断的平均DC数为6.35(SD = 3.14)。除 "营养失衡:低于身体需要量 "外,经验证的虚弱测量工具与所有 DC 相关。在随后的 9 个月中,再次入院仅与记忆障碍有统计学关系(p = 0.07):临床虚弱量表在预测死亡率方面显示出良好的效果。结论:临床虚弱量表在预测死亡率方面显示出良好的效果,研究建议将其纳入老年虚弱综合征的临床表现中。本研究发现,只有记忆障碍这一定义性特征可预测再入院情况。进一步的研究应确定其他相关的预后临床表现:这些发现强调了在入院期间警惕认知能力下降的重要性。本研究中发现的最普遍、最具决定性的认知功能衰退表明,临床应重点关注保护患者的功能和心智能力以及行动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic value of defining characteristics in frail elderly syndrome: Hospital readmission and mortality outcomes

Objective

To identify the most relevant clinical characteristics of the nursing diagnosis frail elderly syndrome (FES) in hospitalized patients aged 65 or older and analyze their impact on 9-month mortality and hospital readmission.

Methods

A prospective and prognostic accuracy study was conducted in patients aged 65 or older, who were admitted to hospital more than 24 h. A consecutive convenience sampling process was used. Assessment included defining characteristics (DCs) of FES, clinical fraility scale (CFS), frail scale (FS), and 9-month mortality and hospital readmission. Statistical tests were used to verify associations between variables. Binary logistic regression analysis and area under the curve were used, to identify significant predictors for the outcomes and evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the DCs.

Findings

This study involved 150 patients. CFS scored 65 patients (43.3%, confidence interval 95% 35.2% a 51.6) as frail and proved a prognostic value of mortality at 9 month from pre-frail state (p = 0.020). The mean number of DCs for FES nursing diagnosis was 6.35 (SD = 3.14). Validated tools for measuring frailty were associated with all DCs, excepting nutritional imbalance: below body needs. The hospital readmission during the following 9 months was only statistically related to memory impairment (p = 0.07).

Conclusion

Clinical frailty scale showed good results as a predictor of mortality. The study suggests exploring including it, in clinical manifestations of elderly frail syndrome. This study found that only memory impairment defining characteristic was predictive of hospital readmission. Further research should identify other relevant and prognostic clinical manifestations.

Implication for nursing practice

These findings highlight the importance of being vigilant on cognitive decline during hospital admissions. The most prevalent and determinant DCs identified in this study indicate that clinical should focus on preserving functional and mental abilities as well as mobility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, the official journal of NANDA International, is a peer-reviewed publication for key professionals committed to discovering, understanding and disseminating nursing knowledge. The Journal aims to clarify the knowledge base of nursing and improve patient safety by developing and disseminating nursing diagnoses and standardized nursing languages, and promoting their clinical use. It seeks to encourage education in clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and assessment and ensure global consistency in conceptual languages. The International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is an essential information resource for healthcare professionals concerned with developing nursing knowledge and /or clinical applications of standardized nursing languages in nursing research, education, practice, and policy. The Journal accepts papers which contribute significantly to international nursing knowledge, including concept analyses, original and applied research, review articles and international and historical perspectives, and welcomes articles discussing clinical challenges and guidelines, education initiatives, and policy initiatives.
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of nursing diagnoses identified at admission and discharge of patients with decompensated heart failure. Evidence of content validity of the "Blood Transfusion Reaction" (code 0700) nursing outcome from the nursing outcomes classification. Evaluating the accuracy of impaired skin integrity in critically ill patients: Key characteristics and clinical implications. Clinical validation of the nursing diagnosis inadequate social support network in breastfeeding mothers: A cross-sectional study. The prevalence of self-neglect among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1