新冠肺炎对K-8科学教学和教师的影响。

Meghan Macias, Ashley Iveland, Melissa Rego, Maya Salcido White
{"title":"新冠肺炎对K-8科学教学和教师的影响。","authors":"Meghan Macias,&nbsp;Ashley Iveland,&nbsp;Melissa Rego,&nbsp;Maya Salcido White","doi":"10.1186/s43031-022-00060-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some science education researchers have presented either isolated findings on specific points in time during the pandemic or non-empirical insights or suggestions for how teachers, district leaders, policymakers, and others should take up the learnings from the pandemic to move science education forward. However, there are few studies published to date that provide robust and longitudinal empirical data on what science instruction looked like throughout the pandemic and the magnitude of the impacts of the pandemic on science instruction when compared to pre-pandemic science teaching and learning. We conducted a primarily survey-based study on science instruction and enactment of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) in K-8 classrooms throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis also incorporates a longitudinal dataset from grade 6-8 teachers across California on their NGSS instruction prior to and throughout the first year of the pandemic, providing insight on instruction over multiple years before and throughout distance learning. Our findings highlight the challenges that teachers and students faced during the pandemic, as well as the significant impacts that distance learning appeared to have on science instruction and teachers' ability to provide NGSS-aligned instruction. However, we also found that a year after the initial school closures, teachers' science instruction began to show improvements both in the frequency of science instruction (how often they were able to provide science instruction through distance learning) and the quality of science instruction (how often teachers were able to provide instruction that was aligned with the goals of the NGSS). Implications of this work are far reaching and may impact teachers, students, administrators, policymakers, professional learning providers, and curriculum developers regardless of whether science instruction occurs through distance learning or in-person moving forward.</p>","PeriodicalId":72822,"journal":{"name":"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research","volume":"4 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108710/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impacts of COVID-19 on K-8 science teaching and teachers.\",\"authors\":\"Meghan Macias,&nbsp;Ashley Iveland,&nbsp;Melissa Rego,&nbsp;Maya Salcido White\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43031-022-00060-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Some science education researchers have presented either isolated findings on specific points in time during the pandemic or non-empirical insights or suggestions for how teachers, district leaders, policymakers, and others should take up the learnings from the pandemic to move science education forward. However, there are few studies published to date that provide robust and longitudinal empirical data on what science instruction looked like throughout the pandemic and the magnitude of the impacts of the pandemic on science instruction when compared to pre-pandemic science teaching and learning. We conducted a primarily survey-based study on science instruction and enactment of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) in K-8 classrooms throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis also incorporates a longitudinal dataset from grade 6-8 teachers across California on their NGSS instruction prior to and throughout the first year of the pandemic, providing insight on instruction over multiple years before and throughout distance learning. Our findings highlight the challenges that teachers and students faced during the pandemic, as well as the significant impacts that distance learning appeared to have on science instruction and teachers' ability to provide NGSS-aligned instruction. However, we also found that a year after the initial school closures, teachers' science instruction began to show improvements both in the frequency of science instruction (how often they were able to provide science instruction through distance learning) and the quality of science instruction (how often teachers were able to provide instruction that was aligned with the goals of the NGSS). Implications of this work are far reaching and may impact teachers, students, administrators, policymakers, professional learning providers, and curriculum developers regardless of whether science instruction occurs through distance learning or in-person moving forward.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9108710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00060-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disciplinary and interdisciplinary science education research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00060-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

一些科学教育研究人员要么就疫情期间的特定时间点提出了孤立的发现,要么就教师、地区领导人、政策制定者和其他人应该如何从疫情中吸取教训来推动科学教育向前发展提出了非实证的见解或建议。然而,迄今为止,很少有研究能够提供强有力的纵向经验数据,说明与疫情前的科学教学相比,疫情期间的科学教学是什么样子的,以及疫情对科学教学的影响程度。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,我们对K-8教室的科学教学和下一代科学标准(NGSS)的制定进行了一项主要基于调查的研究。该分析还纳入了来自加利福尼亚州6-8年级教师的关于疫情前和疫情第一年NGSS教学的纵向数据集,提供了对远程学习前和整个远程学习多年教学的见解。我们的研究结果强调了教师和学生在疫情期间面临的挑战,以及远程学习似乎对科学教学和教师提供与NGSS相一致的教学的能力产生的重大影响。然而,我们也发现,在最初的学校关闭一年后,教师的科学教学开始在科学教学频率(他们能够通过远程学习提供科学教学的频率)和科学教学质量(教师能够提供与NGSS目标一致的教学的频率)方面有所改善。这项工作的影响深远,可能会影响教师、学生、行政人员、政策制定者、专业学习提供者和课程开发人员,无论科学教学是通过远程学习还是亲自进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impacts of COVID-19 on K-8 science teaching and teachers.

Some science education researchers have presented either isolated findings on specific points in time during the pandemic or non-empirical insights or suggestions for how teachers, district leaders, policymakers, and others should take up the learnings from the pandemic to move science education forward. However, there are few studies published to date that provide robust and longitudinal empirical data on what science instruction looked like throughout the pandemic and the magnitude of the impacts of the pandemic on science instruction when compared to pre-pandemic science teaching and learning. We conducted a primarily survey-based study on science instruction and enactment of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) in K-8 classrooms throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis also incorporates a longitudinal dataset from grade 6-8 teachers across California on their NGSS instruction prior to and throughout the first year of the pandemic, providing insight on instruction over multiple years before and throughout distance learning. Our findings highlight the challenges that teachers and students faced during the pandemic, as well as the significant impacts that distance learning appeared to have on science instruction and teachers' ability to provide NGSS-aligned instruction. However, we also found that a year after the initial school closures, teachers' science instruction began to show improvements both in the frequency of science instruction (how often they were able to provide science instruction through distance learning) and the quality of science instruction (how often teachers were able to provide instruction that was aligned with the goals of the NGSS). Implications of this work are far reaching and may impact teachers, students, administrators, policymakers, professional learning providers, and curriculum developers regardless of whether science instruction occurs through distance learning or in-person moving forward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Transforming standards into classrooms for knowledge-in-use: an effective and coherent project-based learning system Alternative grading practices in undergraduate STEM education: a scoping review Characterization of physics and astronomy assistant professors’ reflections on their teaching: can they promote engagement in instructional change? Correction: Moving from surviving to thriving: a taxonomy of beginning science teacher challenges Are science competitions meeting their intentions? a case study on affective and cognitive predictors of success in the Physics Olympiad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1