党派认同中的个人-社区错位预示着COVID-19大流行期间与规范的距离。

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Social Psychological and Personality Science Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1177/19485506221121204
Allecia E Reid, Madison L Eamiello, Andrea Mah, Katherine L Dixon-Gordon, Brian Lickel, Ezra Markowitz, Tatishe M Nteta, Joel Ginn, Se Min Suh
{"title":"党派认同中的个人-社区错位预示着COVID-19大流行期间与规范的距离。","authors":"Allecia E Reid,&nbsp;Madison L Eamiello,&nbsp;Andrea Mah,&nbsp;Katherine L Dixon-Gordon,&nbsp;Brian Lickel,&nbsp;Ezra Markowitz,&nbsp;Tatishe M Nteta,&nbsp;Joel Ginn,&nbsp;Se Min Suh","doi":"10.1177/19485506221121204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated whether misalignment between an individual and their community in partisan identity predicted psychological and behavioral distancing from local COVID-19 norms. A nationally representative sample of Republicans and Democrats provided longitudinal data in April (<i>N</i> = 3,492) and June 2020 (<i>N</i> = 2,649). Democrats in Republican communities reported especially heightened <i>better-than-average estimates</i>, perceiving themselves as more adherent to and approving of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI; e.g., mask wearing) than their community. Democrats'<i>better-than-average estimates</i> reflected high approval and behavior in Republican communities and substantial norm underestimation. Republicans in Democratic communities did not evidence <i>worse-than-average estimates</i>. In longitudinal models, injunctive norms only predicted NPI behavior when individual and community partisan identity were aligned. The strong personal approval-behavior association did not depend on misalignment; there were no effects of descriptive norms. Normative messages may have limited efficacy for a sizable subpopulation in politically polarized contexts, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":21853,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychological and Personality Science","volume":"14 5","pages":"539-550"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195689/pdf/10.1177_19485506221121204.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual-Community Misalignment in Partisan Identity Predicts Distancing From Norms During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Allecia E Reid,&nbsp;Madison L Eamiello,&nbsp;Andrea Mah,&nbsp;Katherine L Dixon-Gordon,&nbsp;Brian Lickel,&nbsp;Ezra Markowitz,&nbsp;Tatishe M Nteta,&nbsp;Joel Ginn,&nbsp;Se Min Suh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19485506221121204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated whether misalignment between an individual and their community in partisan identity predicted psychological and behavioral distancing from local COVID-19 norms. A nationally representative sample of Republicans and Democrats provided longitudinal data in April (<i>N</i> = 3,492) and June 2020 (<i>N</i> = 2,649). Democrats in Republican communities reported especially heightened <i>better-than-average estimates</i>, perceiving themselves as more adherent to and approving of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI; e.g., mask wearing) than their community. Democrats'<i>better-than-average estimates</i> reflected high approval and behavior in Republican communities and substantial norm underestimation. Republicans in Democratic communities did not evidence <i>worse-than-average estimates</i>. In longitudinal models, injunctive norms only predicted NPI behavior when individual and community partisan identity were aligned. The strong personal approval-behavior association did not depend on misalignment; there were no effects of descriptive norms. Normative messages may have limited efficacy for a sizable subpopulation in politically polarized contexts, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychological and Personality Science\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"539-550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195689/pdf/10.1177_19485506221121204.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychological and Personality Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221121204\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychological and Personality Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221121204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了个人与其社区在党派身份上的不一致是否预示着与当地COVID-19规范的心理和行为距离。共和党和民主党的全国代表性样本在2020年4月(N = 3,492)和6月(N = 2,649)提供了纵向数据。共和党社区的民主党人报告了高于平均水平的评估,认为自己更坚持和赞成非药物干预(NPI;例如,戴口罩)比他们的社区。民主党人的预估好于平均水平,反映了共和党社区对民主党人的高度认可和行为,以及对规范的严重低估。民主党社区的共和党人并没有表现出低于平均水平的估计。在纵向模型中,禁令规范仅在个人和社区党派认同一致时预测NPI行为。强烈的个人认可-行为关联不依赖于偏差;描述性规范没有影响。在COVID-19大流行等政治两极分化的背景下,规范性信息对相当大的亚群体的效力可能有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual-Community Misalignment in Partisan Identity Predicts Distancing From Norms During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This study investigated whether misalignment between an individual and their community in partisan identity predicted psychological and behavioral distancing from local COVID-19 norms. A nationally representative sample of Republicans and Democrats provided longitudinal data in April (N = 3,492) and June 2020 (N = 2,649). Democrats in Republican communities reported especially heightened better-than-average estimates, perceiving themselves as more adherent to and approving of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI; e.g., mask wearing) than their community. Democrats'better-than-average estimates reflected high approval and behavior in Republican communities and substantial norm underestimation. Republicans in Democratic communities did not evidence worse-than-average estimates. In longitudinal models, injunctive norms only predicted NPI behavior when individual and community partisan identity were aligned. The strong personal approval-behavior association did not depend on misalignment; there were no effects of descriptive norms. Normative messages may have limited efficacy for a sizable subpopulation in politically polarized contexts, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.80%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Social Psychological and Personality Science (SPPS) is a distinctive journal in the fields of social and personality psychology that focuses on publishing brief empirical study reports, typically limited to 5000 words. The journal's mission is to disseminate research that significantly contributes to the advancement of social psychological and personality science. It welcomes submissions that introduce new theories, present empirical data, propose innovative methods, or offer a combination of these elements. SPPS also places a high value on replication studies, giving them serious consideration regardless of whether they confirm or challenge the original findings, with a particular emphasis on replications of studies initially published in SPPS. The journal is committed to a rapid review and publication process, ensuring that research can swiftly enter the scientific discourse and become an integral part of ongoing academic conversations.
期刊最新文献
Perceived Naturalness Biases Objective Behavior in Both Trivial and Meaningful Contexts Corrigendum to a Potential Pitfall of Passion: Passion is Associated with Performance Overconfidence The Game Within the Game: The Potential Influence of Demand Characteristics and Participant Beliefs in Violent Video Game Studies An Improved Scoring Algorithm for Indirect Evaluation Measurement With the Evaluative Priming Task Is the Effect of Trust on Risk Perceptions a Matter of Knowledge, Control, and Time? An Extension and Direct-Replication Attempt of Siegrist and Cvetkovich (2000)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1