硅学 ADME/tox 时代的到来:二十年后。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Xenobiotica Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1080/00498254.2023.2245049
Sean Ekins, Thomas R Lane, Fabio Urbina, Ana C Puhl
{"title":"硅学 ADME/tox 时代的到来:二十年后。","authors":"Sean Ekins, Thomas R Lane, Fabio Urbina, Ana C Puhl","doi":"10.1080/00498254.2023.2245049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the early 2000s pharmaceutical drug discovery was beginning to use computational approaches for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADME/Tox, also known as ADMET) prediction. This emphasis on prediction was an effort to reduce the risk of later stage failures from ADME/Tox.Much has been written in the intervening twenty plus years and significant expenditure has occurred in companies developing these <i>in silico</i> capabilities which can be gleaned from publications. It is therefore an appropriate time to briefly reflect on what was proposed then and what the reality is today.20 years ago, we tended to optimise bioactivity and perhaps one ADME/Tox property at a time. Previously pharmaceutical companies needed a whole infrastructure for models - <i>in silico</i> and <i>in vitro</i> experts, IT, champions on a project team, educators and management support. Now we are in the age of generative <i>de novo</i> design where bioactivity and many ADME/Tox properties can be optimised and large language model technologies are available.There are also some challenges such as the focus on very large molecules which may be outside of current ADME/Tox models.We provide an opportunity to look forward with the increasing public data for ADME/Tox as well as expanded types of algorithms available.</p>","PeriodicalId":23812,"journal":{"name":"Xenobiotica","volume":" ","pages":"352-358"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10850432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In silico</i> ADME/tox comes of age: twenty years later.\",\"authors\":\"Sean Ekins, Thomas R Lane, Fabio Urbina, Ana C Puhl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00498254.2023.2245049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the early 2000s pharmaceutical drug discovery was beginning to use computational approaches for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADME/Tox, also known as ADMET) prediction. This emphasis on prediction was an effort to reduce the risk of later stage failures from ADME/Tox.Much has been written in the intervening twenty plus years and significant expenditure has occurred in companies developing these <i>in silico</i> capabilities which can be gleaned from publications. It is therefore an appropriate time to briefly reflect on what was proposed then and what the reality is today.20 years ago, we tended to optimise bioactivity and perhaps one ADME/Tox property at a time. Previously pharmaceutical companies needed a whole infrastructure for models - <i>in silico</i> and <i>in vitro</i> experts, IT, champions on a project team, educators and management support. Now we are in the age of generative <i>de novo</i> design where bioactivity and many ADME/Tox properties can be optimised and large language model technologies are available.There are also some challenges such as the focus on very large molecules which may be outside of current ADME/Tox models.We provide an opportunity to look forward with the increasing public data for ADME/Tox as well as expanded types of algorithms available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Xenobiotica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"352-358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10850432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Xenobiotica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00498254.2023.2245049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Xenobiotica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00498254.2023.2245049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本世纪初,药物研发开始使用计算方法对药物的吸收、分布、代谢、排泄和毒性(ADME/Tox,又称 ADMET)进行预测。在这二十多年间,人们写了很多文章,各公司也投入了大量资金开发这些硅学能力,这些都可以从出版物中了解到。20 年前,我们倾向于优化生物活性,也许一次只优化一种 ADME/Tox 特性。以前,制药公司需要一整套模型基础设施--硅学和体外专家、信息技术、项目团队的支持者、教育者和管理支持。现在,我们正处于生成式从头设计的时代,生物活性和许多 ADME/Tox 属性都可以得到优化,并且可以使用大型语言模型技术。我们也面临着一些挑战,例如对超大分子的关注可能超出了当前 ADME/Tox 模型的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In silico ADME/tox comes of age: twenty years later.

In the early 2000s pharmaceutical drug discovery was beginning to use computational approaches for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADME/Tox, also known as ADMET) prediction. This emphasis on prediction was an effort to reduce the risk of later stage failures from ADME/Tox.Much has been written in the intervening twenty plus years and significant expenditure has occurred in companies developing these in silico capabilities which can be gleaned from publications. It is therefore an appropriate time to briefly reflect on what was proposed then and what the reality is today.20 years ago, we tended to optimise bioactivity and perhaps one ADME/Tox property at a time. Previously pharmaceutical companies needed a whole infrastructure for models - in silico and in vitro experts, IT, champions on a project team, educators and management support. Now we are in the age of generative de novo design where bioactivity and many ADME/Tox properties can be optimised and large language model technologies are available.There are also some challenges such as the focus on very large molecules which may be outside of current ADME/Tox models.We provide an opportunity to look forward with the increasing public data for ADME/Tox as well as expanded types of algorithms available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Xenobiotica
Xenobiotica 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
96
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Xenobiotica covers seven main areas, including:General Xenobiochemistry, including in vitro studies concerned with the metabolism, disposition and excretion of drugs, and other xenobiotics, as well as the structure, function and regulation of associated enzymesClinical Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism, covering the pharmacokinetics and absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs and other xenobiotics in manAnimal Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism, covering the pharmacokinetics, and absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs and other xenobiotics in animalsPharmacogenetics, defined as the identification and functional characterisation of polymorphic genes that encode xenobiotic metabolising enzymes and transporters that may result in altered enzymatic, cellular and clinical responses to xenobioticsMolecular Toxicology, concerning the mechanisms of toxicity and the study of toxicology of xenobiotics at the molecular levelXenobiotic Transporters, concerned with all aspects of the carrier proteins involved in the movement of xenobiotics into and out of cells, and their impact on pharmacokinetic behaviour in animals and manTopics in Xenobiochemistry, in the form of reviews and commentaries are primarily intended to be a critical analysis of the issue, wherein the author offers opinions on the relevance of data or of a particular experimental approach or methodology
期刊最新文献
Potential influence of interleukin-6 -174G/C gene polymorphism on kidney graft function and tacrolimus dose requirements: five-year follow-up. Preclinical metabolism and disposition of [14C]GFH009, a novel selective CDK9 inhibitor. Effects of benzophenone-3 on the liver and thyroid of adult zebrafish. Notable drug-drug interaction between omeprazole and voriconazole in CYP2C19 *1 and *2 (rs4244285, 681G>A) alleles in vitro. Justification of widened dissolution specifications of an extended-release product using physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1