回顾性研究(2009-2019):220只犬术前经皮细针抽吸孤立性肝肿块细胞学的临床应用

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7283
Megan Cray, Jessica Hokamp, Brittany Abrams, Brian D Husbands, Janet A Grimes, Hadley Gleason, David McChesney, Sue A Casale, Laura Elizabeth Selmic
{"title":"回顾性研究(2009-2019):220只犬术前经皮细针抽吸孤立性肝肿块细胞学的临床应用","authors":"Megan Cray,&nbsp;Jessica Hokamp,&nbsp;Brittany Abrams,&nbsp;Brian D Husbands,&nbsp;Janet A Grimes,&nbsp;Hadley Gleason,&nbsp;David McChesney,&nbsp;Sue A Casale,&nbsp;Laura Elizabeth Selmic","doi":"10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When a solitary liver mass is identified in a dog, a fine-needle aspirate (FNA) is commonly employed to attempt to obtain a diagnosis. Little information is provided in the literature evaluating the sensitivity/specificity of FNA cytology for solitary liver masses. We hypothesized that liver lesion size nor the presence of cavitation would impact the success of cytological diagnosis. Medical records were obtained for 220 client-owned dogs. Inclusion criteria included preoperative abdominal imaging, percutaneous FNA of a solitary hepatic mass with cytologic interpretation by a board-certified pathologist, and a surgical biopsy or mass excision yielding a histopathological diagnosis. Six dogs (2.7%) experienced a complication after FNA, none considered severe. The agreement rate for correct cytologic diagnosis was 22.9% (49/220). Of the neoplastic masses 18.9% (35/185) were correctly diagnosed via cytology. The overall sensitivity was 60%, and the specificity was 68.6%. Neither institution (P = 0.16), lesion size (P = 0.88), cavitation (P = 0.34), or needle gauge (P = 0.20) had an association with correct diagnosis. This study demonstrates that, although there is a low risk of complications following FNA of a hepatic mass, overall success rate for correct cytologic diagnosis based on FNA was low compared to histopathologic diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association","volume":"59 1","pages":"12-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Utility of Cytology from Preoperative Percutaneous Fine Needle Aspirates of Solitary Liver Masses in 220 Dogs: A Retrospective Study (2009-2019).\",\"authors\":\"Megan Cray,&nbsp;Jessica Hokamp,&nbsp;Brittany Abrams,&nbsp;Brian D Husbands,&nbsp;Janet A Grimes,&nbsp;Hadley Gleason,&nbsp;David McChesney,&nbsp;Sue A Casale,&nbsp;Laura Elizabeth Selmic\",\"doi\":\"10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When a solitary liver mass is identified in a dog, a fine-needle aspirate (FNA) is commonly employed to attempt to obtain a diagnosis. Little information is provided in the literature evaluating the sensitivity/specificity of FNA cytology for solitary liver masses. We hypothesized that liver lesion size nor the presence of cavitation would impact the success of cytological diagnosis. Medical records were obtained for 220 client-owned dogs. Inclusion criteria included preoperative abdominal imaging, percutaneous FNA of a solitary hepatic mass with cytologic interpretation by a board-certified pathologist, and a surgical biopsy or mass excision yielding a histopathological diagnosis. Six dogs (2.7%) experienced a complication after FNA, none considered severe. The agreement rate for correct cytologic diagnosis was 22.9% (49/220). Of the neoplastic masses 18.9% (35/185) were correctly diagnosed via cytology. The overall sensitivity was 60%, and the specificity was 68.6%. Neither institution (P = 0.16), lesion size (P = 0.88), cavitation (P = 0.34), or needle gauge (P = 0.20) had an association with correct diagnosis. This study demonstrates that, although there is a low risk of complications following FNA of a hepatic mass, overall success rate for correct cytologic diagnosis based on FNA was low compared to histopathologic diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"12-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7283\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5326/JAAHA-MS-7283","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当在狗身上发现一个孤立的肝脏肿块时,通常采用细针抽吸(FNA)来试图获得诊断。在评价FNA细胞学对孤立性肝肿块的敏感性/特异性的文献中,提供的信息很少。我们假设肝脏病变的大小和空化的存在会影响细胞学诊断的成功。获得了220只客户拥有的狗的医疗记录。纳入标准包括术前腹部影像学检查,经皮穿刺FNA检查单发肝脏肿块并由专业认证的病理学家进行细胞学解释,手术活检或肿块切除得到组织病理学诊断。6只(2.7%)犬在FNA后出现并发症,均不严重。正确的细胞学诊断符合率为22.9%(49/220)。18.9%(35/185)的肿瘤肿块通过细胞学检查得到正确诊断。总敏感性为60%,特异性为68.6%。医院(P = 0.16)、病变大小(P = 0.88)、空化(P = 0.34)或针距(P = 0.20)与正确诊断均无相关性。本研究表明,尽管肝肿块FNA术后并发症的风险较低,但与组织病理学诊断相比,基于FNA的正确细胞学诊断的总体成功率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Utility of Cytology from Preoperative Percutaneous Fine Needle Aspirates of Solitary Liver Masses in 220 Dogs: A Retrospective Study (2009-2019).

When a solitary liver mass is identified in a dog, a fine-needle aspirate (FNA) is commonly employed to attempt to obtain a diagnosis. Little information is provided in the literature evaluating the sensitivity/specificity of FNA cytology for solitary liver masses. We hypothesized that liver lesion size nor the presence of cavitation would impact the success of cytological diagnosis. Medical records were obtained for 220 client-owned dogs. Inclusion criteria included preoperative abdominal imaging, percutaneous FNA of a solitary hepatic mass with cytologic interpretation by a board-certified pathologist, and a surgical biopsy or mass excision yielding a histopathological diagnosis. Six dogs (2.7%) experienced a complication after FNA, none considered severe. The agreement rate for correct cytologic diagnosis was 22.9% (49/220). Of the neoplastic masses 18.9% (35/185) were correctly diagnosed via cytology. The overall sensitivity was 60%, and the specificity was 68.6%. Neither institution (P = 0.16), lesion size (P = 0.88), cavitation (P = 0.34), or needle gauge (P = 0.20) had an association with correct diagnosis. This study demonstrates that, although there is a low risk of complications following FNA of a hepatic mass, overall success rate for correct cytologic diagnosis based on FNA was low compared to histopathologic diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the JAAHA is to publish relevant, original, timely scientific and technical information pertaining to the practice of small animal medicine and surgery.
期刊最新文献
2025 AAHA Referral Guidelines. Nonsurgical Management of a Caudal Mediastinal Granuloma. Long-Term Survival of Primary Intracranial Histiocytic Sarcoma Through Surgical Resection and Low-Dose CCNU. Treatment Outcomes of Canine Orbital Meningiomas in Seven Cases. 2022 AAHA Canine Vaccination Guidelines (2024 Update).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1