将社区保健员和助产士纳入医疗团队,以改善分娩和母乳喂养效果。

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Perinatal Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1891/JPE-2022-0025
Getty Israel
{"title":"将社区保健员和助产士纳入医疗团队,以改善分娩和母乳喂养效果。","authors":"Getty Israel","doi":"10.1891/JPE-2022-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A plethora of international research has consistently demonstrated the efficacy of both the nurse-midwifery model and the community health worker (CHW) model in improving birth and breastfeeding outcomes, particularly among low-income women. However, these two professional groups rarely work as a team in the U.S. health-care system. Typically, certified nurse midwives are on staff at clinics and hospitals; conversely, CHWs tend to work at non-profit community organizations. Although the Community Preventive Services Task Force concluded that integrating CHWs on clinical care teams is effective, these paraprofessionals remain nearly excluded from the healthcare organization because they are not licensed healthcare professionals, hence, non reimbursable. We integrated these two health professional groups within a small, community-based, nonprofit, and charitable women's clinic in Jackson, Mississippi, serving a predominantly Medicaid population to determine if their combined health services would significantly improve birth and breastfeeding outcomes among an intervention group compared with a control group that received usual standard care from an obstetrician.</p>","PeriodicalId":46449,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9822562/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Community Health Workers and Nurse Midwives on the Health-Care Team to Improve Birth and Breastfeeding Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Getty Israel\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JPE-2022-0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A plethora of international research has consistently demonstrated the efficacy of both the nurse-midwifery model and the community health worker (CHW) model in improving birth and breastfeeding outcomes, particularly among low-income women. However, these two professional groups rarely work as a team in the U.S. health-care system. Typically, certified nurse midwives are on staff at clinics and hospitals; conversely, CHWs tend to work at non-profit community organizations. Although the Community Preventive Services Task Force concluded that integrating CHWs on clinical care teams is effective, these paraprofessionals remain nearly excluded from the healthcare organization because they are not licensed healthcare professionals, hence, non reimbursable. We integrated these two health professional groups within a small, community-based, nonprofit, and charitable women's clinic in Jackson, Mississippi, serving a predominantly Medicaid population to determine if their combined health services would significantly improve birth and breastfeeding outcomes among an intervention group compared with a control group that received usual standard care from an obstetrician.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal Education\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"8-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9822562/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JPE-2022-0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JPE-2022-0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大量的国际研究不断证明,护士助产模式和社区保健员(CHW)模式在改善分娩和母乳喂养效果方面都很有效,尤其是在低收入妇女中。然而,在美国的医疗保健系统中,这两个专业团体很少作为一个团队开展工作。通常情况下,注册助产士是诊所和医院的工作人员;相反,社区保健员往往在非营利性社区组织工作。尽管社区预防服务特别工作组认为将社区保健工作者纳入临床护理团队是有效的,但这些辅助专业人员仍几乎被排除在医疗机构之外,因为他们不是获得执照的医疗保健专业人员,因此不能报销费用。我们在密西西比州杰克逊市一家以社区为基础的小型非营利慈善妇女诊所内整合了这两个医疗专业团体,主要服务于医疗补助人群,以确定与接受产科医生常规标准护理的对照组相比,他们的综合医疗服务是否能显著改善干预组的分娩和母乳喂养效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating Community Health Workers and Nurse Midwives on the Health-Care Team to Improve Birth and Breastfeeding Outcomes.

A plethora of international research has consistently demonstrated the efficacy of both the nurse-midwifery model and the community health worker (CHW) model in improving birth and breastfeeding outcomes, particularly among low-income women. However, these two professional groups rarely work as a team in the U.S. health-care system. Typically, certified nurse midwives are on staff at clinics and hospitals; conversely, CHWs tend to work at non-profit community organizations. Although the Community Preventive Services Task Force concluded that integrating CHWs on clinical care teams is effective, these paraprofessionals remain nearly excluded from the healthcare organization because they are not licensed healthcare professionals, hence, non reimbursable. We integrated these two health professional groups within a small, community-based, nonprofit, and charitable women's clinic in Jackson, Mississippi, serving a predominantly Medicaid population to determine if their combined health services would significantly improve birth and breastfeeding outcomes among an intervention group compared with a control group that received usual standard care from an obstetrician.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Education
Journal of Perinatal Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Education (JPE) is the leading peer-reviewed journal specifically for childbirth educators. Through evidence-based articles, the JPE advances the knowledge of aspiring and seasoned educators in any setting-independent or private practice, community, hospital, nursing or midwifery school-and informs educators and other health care professionals on research that will improve their practice and their efforts to support natural, safe, and healthy birth. The JPE also publishes features that provide practical resources and advice health care professionals can use to enhance the quality and effectiveness of their care or teaching to prepare expectant parents for birth. The journal''s content focuses on pregnancy, childbirth, the postpartum period, breastfeeding, neonatal care, early parenting, and young family development. In addition to childbirth educators, the JPE''s readers include nurses, midwives, physicians, and other professionals involved with perinatal education and maternal-child health care.
期刊最新文献
A 62-Year-Old Organization Battling the Maternal Health Crisis: The Lamaze of Today. Improving Online Childbirth Education: A Role for Active Learning. Strategies to Integrate Content on Consensual Nonmonogamy and the Transition to Parenthood Into Perinatal Education Practice. The Effect of Spinning Babies® Education on Confidence in Implementing Techniques and Knowledge Regarding Safety Related to Labor Positioning Among Birth Professionals. The Philosophy That Enables the Return to Our Essence in Breastfeeding: HypnoBreastfeeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1