爱荷华州居民早期乳腺癌的医院乡村性和基因表达谱(2010-2018)

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/8582894
Danielle Riley, Mary Charlton, Elizabeth A Chrischilles, Ingrid M Lizarraga, Sneha Phadke, Brian J Smith, Adam Skibbe, Charles F Lynch
{"title":"爱荷华州居民早期乳腺癌的医院乡村性和基因表达谱(2010-2018)","authors":"Danielle Riley,&nbsp;Mary Charlton,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Chrischilles,&nbsp;Ingrid M Lizarraga,&nbsp;Sneha Phadke,&nbsp;Brian J Smith,&nbsp;Adam Skibbe,&nbsp;Charles F Lynch","doi":"10.1155/2022/8582894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the challenges rural cancer patients face in accessing cancer care as well as the slower diffusion and adoption of new medical technologies among rural providers, the aim of our study was to examine trends in gene expression profiling (GEP) testing and evaluate the association between hospital rurality and receipt of GEP testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Iowa Cancer Registry (ICR) were used to identify women with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed breast cancer from 2010 through 2018 who met eligibility criteria for GEP testing. Patients were allocated to the hospitals where their most definitive surgical treatment was received, and Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes were used to categorize hospitals into urban (<i>N</i> = 43), large rural (<i>N</i> = 16), and small rural (<i>N</i> = 48). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between hospital rurality and GEP test use, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. The association between test result and treatment received was assessed among patients who received Oncotype DX (ODX) testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6,726 patients eligible for GEP test use, 46% (<i>N</i> = 3,069) underwent testing with 95% receiving ODX. While overall GEP testing rates increased over time from 42% between 2010 and 2012 to 51% between 2016 and 2018 (<i>P</i> <sub>trend</sub> < 0.0001), use continued to be the lowest among patients treated at hospitals in small rural areas. The odds of GEP testing remained significantly lower among patients treated at hospitals located in small rural areas (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.43-0.71), after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. ODX recurrence scores were highly correlated with chemotherapy use across all strata of hospital rurality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GEP testing continues to be underutilized, especially among those treated at small rural hospitals. Targeted interventions aimed at increasing rates of GEP testing to ensure the appropriate use of adjuvant chemotherapy may improve health outcomes and lower treatment-related costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2022 ","pages":"8582894"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Rurality and Gene Expression Profiling for Early-Stage Breast Cancer among Iowa Residents (2010-2018).\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Riley,&nbsp;Mary Charlton,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Chrischilles,&nbsp;Ingrid M Lizarraga,&nbsp;Sneha Phadke,&nbsp;Brian J Smith,&nbsp;Adam Skibbe,&nbsp;Charles F Lynch\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/8582894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the challenges rural cancer patients face in accessing cancer care as well as the slower diffusion and adoption of new medical technologies among rural providers, the aim of our study was to examine trends in gene expression profiling (GEP) testing and evaluate the association between hospital rurality and receipt of GEP testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Iowa Cancer Registry (ICR) were used to identify women with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed breast cancer from 2010 through 2018 who met eligibility criteria for GEP testing. Patients were allocated to the hospitals where their most definitive surgical treatment was received, and Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes were used to categorize hospitals into urban (<i>N</i> = 43), large rural (<i>N</i> = 16), and small rural (<i>N</i> = 48). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between hospital rurality and GEP test use, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. The association between test result and treatment received was assessed among patients who received Oncotype DX (ODX) testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6,726 patients eligible for GEP test use, 46% (<i>N</i> = 3,069) underwent testing with 95% receiving ODX. While overall GEP testing rates increased over time from 42% between 2010 and 2012 to 51% between 2016 and 2018 (<i>P</i> <sub>trend</sub> < 0.0001), use continued to be the lowest among patients treated at hospitals in small rural areas. The odds of GEP testing remained significantly lower among patients treated at hospitals located in small rural areas (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.43-0.71), after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. ODX recurrence scores were highly correlated with chemotherapy use across all strata of hospital rurality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GEP testing continues to be underutilized, especially among those treated at small rural hospitals. Targeted interventions aimed at increasing rates of GEP testing to ensure the appropriate use of adjuvant chemotherapy may improve health outcomes and lower treatment-related costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Journal\",\"volume\":\"2022 \",\"pages\":\"8582894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448596/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8582894\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8582894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:考虑到农村癌症患者在获得癌症治疗方面面临的挑战,以及新医疗技术在农村医疗机构中的传播和采用速度较慢,本研究的目的是研究基因表达谱(GEP)检测的趋势,并评估医院农村性与接受GEP检测之间的关系。方法:使用爱荷华州癌症登记处(ICR)的数据,确定2010年至2018年期间符合GEP检测资格标准的新诊断、组织学证实的乳腺癌女性。患者被分配到接受最明确手术治疗的医院,并使用城乡通勤区域代码将医院分为城市(N = 43)、大型农村(N = 16)和小型农村(N = 48)。校正优势比(aORs)和95%置信区间(ci)使用多变量logistic回归评估医院乡村性和GEP测试使用之间的关系,调整人口统计学和临床特征。在接受Oncotype DX (ODX)检测的患者中评估检测结果与所接受治疗之间的关系。结果:在6726名符合GEP测试使用条件的患者中,46% (N = 3069)接受了测试,95%接受了ODX。虽然总体GEP检测率随着时间的推移从2010年至2012年的42%上升到2016年至2018年的51% (P趋势< 0.0001),但在小农村地区医院接受治疗的患者中,使用率仍然最低。在小农村地区医院接受治疗的患者中,GEP检测的几率仍然明显较低(aOR 0.55;95% CI 0.43-0.71),在调整了人口统计学和临床特征后。ODX复发评分与医院农村各阶层的化疗使用高度相关。结论:GEP检测仍然未得到充分利用,特别是在小型农村医院接受治疗的患者中。有针对性的干预措施旨在提高GEP检测率,以确保适当使用辅助化疗,可改善健康结果并降低与治疗相关的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hospital Rurality and Gene Expression Profiling for Early-Stage Breast Cancer among Iowa Residents (2010-2018).

Objective: Given the challenges rural cancer patients face in accessing cancer care as well as the slower diffusion and adoption of new medical technologies among rural providers, the aim of our study was to examine trends in gene expression profiling (GEP) testing and evaluate the association between hospital rurality and receipt of GEP testing.

Methods: Data from the Iowa Cancer Registry (ICR) were used to identify women with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed breast cancer from 2010 through 2018 who met eligibility criteria for GEP testing. Patients were allocated to the hospitals where their most definitive surgical treatment was received, and Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes were used to categorize hospitals into urban (N = 43), large rural (N = 16), and small rural (N = 48). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between hospital rurality and GEP test use, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. The association between test result and treatment received was assessed among patients who received Oncotype DX (ODX) testing.

Results: Of 6,726 patients eligible for GEP test use, 46% (N = 3,069) underwent testing with 95% receiving ODX. While overall GEP testing rates increased over time from 42% between 2010 and 2012 to 51% between 2016 and 2018 (P trend < 0.0001), use continued to be the lowest among patients treated at hospitals in small rural areas. The odds of GEP testing remained significantly lower among patients treated at hospitals located in small rural areas (aOR 0.55; 95% CI 0.43-0.71), after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. ODX recurrence scores were highly correlated with chemotherapy use across all strata of hospital rurality.

Conclusions: GEP testing continues to be underutilized, especially among those treated at small rural hospitals. Targeted interventions aimed at increasing rates of GEP testing to ensure the appropriate use of adjuvant chemotherapy may improve health outcomes and lower treatment-related costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
期刊最新文献
Intramammary Tumor Location and Ipsilateral Lymphatic Spread in Early Breast Cancer Patients Using One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) Assay Relationship Between Mitochondrial Biological Function and Breast Cancer Unveiling miRNA30b’s Role in Suppressing ADAM12 to Combat Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Effect of Estrogen Receptor on the Relationship Between HER2 Immunohistochemistry Score and Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1