野生扫帚和学习分析

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Computing in Higher Education Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.1007/s12528-023-09353-6
Benjamin A Motz, Anastasia S Morrone
{"title":"野生扫帚和学习分析","authors":"Benjamin A Motz, Anastasia S Morrone","doi":"10.1007/s12528-023-09353-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this commentary we present an analogy between Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe's classic poem, <i>The Sorcerer's Apprentice</i>, and institutional learning analytics. In doing so, we hope to provoke institutions with a simple heuristic when considering their learning analytics initiatives. They might ask themselves, \"Are we behaving like the sorcerer's apprentice?\" This would be characterized by initiatives lacking faculty involvement, and we argue that when initiatives fit this pattern, they also lack consideration of their potential hazards, and are likely to fail. We join others in advocating for institutions to, instead, create ecosystems that enable faculty leadership in institutional learning analytics efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wild brooms and learning analytics.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin A Motz, Anastasia S Morrone\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12528-023-09353-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this commentary we present an analogy between Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe's classic poem, <i>The Sorcerer's Apprentice</i>, and institutional learning analytics. In doing so, we hope to provoke institutions with a simple heuristic when considering their learning analytics initiatives. They might ask themselves, \\\"Are we behaving like the sorcerer's apprentice?\\\" This would be characterized by initiatives lacking faculty involvement, and we argue that when initiatives fit this pattern, they also lack consideration of their potential hazards, and are likely to fail. We join others in advocating for institutions to, instead, create ecosystems that enable faculty leadership in institutional learning analytics efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computing in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9872731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computing in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09353-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09353-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇评论中,我们将约翰-沃尔夫冈-冯-歌德的经典诗作《魔法师的学徒》与机构学习分析进行了类比。我们希望通过这种方式,让各机构在考虑其学习分析计划时有一个简单的启发。他们可能会问自己:"我们的行为像巫师的学徒吗?"这种做法的特点是缺乏教师的参与,我们认为,当举措符合这种模式时,它们也缺乏对其潜在危害的考虑,很可能会失败。我们和其他人一样,主张各院校创建生态系统,让教师在院校的学习分析工作中发挥领导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wild brooms and learning analytics.

In this commentary we present an analogy between Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe's classic poem, The Sorcerer's Apprentice, and institutional learning analytics. In doing so, we hope to provoke institutions with a simple heuristic when considering their learning analytics initiatives. They might ask themselves, "Are we behaving like the sorcerer's apprentice?" This would be characterized by initiatives lacking faculty involvement, and we argue that when initiatives fit this pattern, they also lack consideration of their potential hazards, and are likely to fail. We join others in advocating for institutions to, instead, create ecosystems that enable faculty leadership in institutional learning analytics efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Journal of Computing in Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Journal of Computing in Higher Education (JCHE) contributes to our understanding of the design, development, and implementation of instructional processes and technologies in higher education. JCHE publishes original research, literature reviews, implementation and evaluation studies, and theoretical, conceptual, and policy papers that provide perspectives on instructional technology’s role in improving access, affordability, and outcomes of postsecondary education.  Priority is given to well-documented original papers that demonstrate a strong grounding in learning theory and/or rigorous educational research design.
期刊最新文献
Using an integrated probabilistic clustering approach to detect student engagement across asynchronous and synchronous online discussions Changing student privacy responsibilities and governance needs: Views from faculty, instructional designers, and academic librarians Effects and acceptability of virtual reality to facilitate mindfulness practice in university students Designing courses with sustainable virtual learning communities: a STEM teacher candidate course that extends beyond higher education Validation of self-efficacy questionnaire of online learning for students with disabilities in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1