[评价男性工人口腔健康状况与主观咀嚼症状的关系]。

Naomichi Tani, Takashi Hanioka, Yoshiyuki Higuchi, Masanori Ohta, Ryoko Yamamoto, Junichi Akatsu
{"title":"[评价男性工人口腔健康状况与主观咀嚼症状的关系]。","authors":"Naomichi Tani,&nbsp;Takashi Hanioka,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Higuchi,&nbsp;Masanori Ohta,&nbsp;Ryoko Yamamoto,&nbsp;Junichi Akatsu","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2021-027-B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In recent years, the relationship between oral health status and various diseases has been increasingly reported worldwide, leading to a growing understanding of the importance of oral health. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between oral health status, determined after a dental health check-up, and chewing condition, determined via a questionnaire for specific health check-ups with the newly added chewing condition item-When you chew your food, which most accurately describes your chewing-.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 20,834 Japanese workers who underwent dental health check-ups and specific health check-ups from April 2018 to March 2019, 4,011 male workers (51.2 ± 6.1 years, range 40-64 years) were extracted for this study. Participants were divided into two groups, the good chewing condition group (GCG) and poor chewing condition group (PCG), according to their responses to a questionnaire regarding chewing conditions. We collected and compared data on subjects' age, smoking status, number of teeth present, number of filled teeth, number of decayed teeth, number of missing teeth with prosthetic treatment, periodontal pockets, gingival bleeding, oral hygiene status, and Eichner's classification. Additionally, to clarify the risk associated with chewing condition, we performed stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis with good chewing condition/poor chewing condition as the dependent variable, and age, smoking status, number of teeth present, number of filled teeth, number of missing teeth with prosthetic treatment, periodontal pockets, oral hygiene status, and Eichner's classification as the independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result of stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the factors that remained in the final model were as follows; the number of decayed teeth (OR = 1.18 [95% CI: 1.12-1.24]); periodontal pockets of 3 mm or less vs. 6 mm or more (OR = 1.63 [95% CI: 1.12-2.37]); Eichner's classification A1 vs. A2 (OR = 1.40 [95% CI: 1.08-1.82]), A3 (OR = 1.66 [95% CI: 1.09-2.52]), B1 (OR = 3.38 [95% CI: 2.04-5.61]), B2 (OR = 5.26 [95% CI: 2.46-11.2]), B3 (OR = 4.28 [95% CI: 1.20-15.2]), B4 (OR = 7.59 [95% CI: 1.06-54.5]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest a significant association between the newly added \"chewing condition\" item in the questionnaire for specific health check-ups and oral status; the number of decayed teeth, periodontal pockets, Eichner's classification.</p>","PeriodicalId":40039,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":"65 1","pages":"9-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluating the relationship between oral health status in male workers and question item regarding subjective chewing symptoms].\",\"authors\":\"Naomichi Tani,&nbsp;Takashi Hanioka,&nbsp;Yoshiyuki Higuchi,&nbsp;Masanori Ohta,&nbsp;Ryoko Yamamoto,&nbsp;Junichi Akatsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2021-027-B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In recent years, the relationship between oral health status and various diseases has been increasingly reported worldwide, leading to a growing understanding of the importance of oral health. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between oral health status, determined after a dental health check-up, and chewing condition, determined via a questionnaire for specific health check-ups with the newly added chewing condition item-When you chew your food, which most accurately describes your chewing-.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 20,834 Japanese workers who underwent dental health check-ups and specific health check-ups from April 2018 to March 2019, 4,011 male workers (51.2 ± 6.1 years, range 40-64 years) were extracted for this study. Participants were divided into two groups, the good chewing condition group (GCG) and poor chewing condition group (PCG), according to their responses to a questionnaire regarding chewing conditions. We collected and compared data on subjects' age, smoking status, number of teeth present, number of filled teeth, number of decayed teeth, number of missing teeth with prosthetic treatment, periodontal pockets, gingival bleeding, oral hygiene status, and Eichner's classification. Additionally, to clarify the risk associated with chewing condition, we performed stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis with good chewing condition/poor chewing condition as the dependent variable, and age, smoking status, number of teeth present, number of filled teeth, number of missing teeth with prosthetic treatment, periodontal pockets, oral hygiene status, and Eichner's classification as the independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The result of stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the factors that remained in the final model were as follows; the number of decayed teeth (OR = 1.18 [95% CI: 1.12-1.24]); periodontal pockets of 3 mm or less vs. 6 mm or more (OR = 1.63 [95% CI: 1.12-2.37]); Eichner's classification A1 vs. A2 (OR = 1.40 [95% CI: 1.08-1.82]), A3 (OR = 1.66 [95% CI: 1.09-2.52]), B1 (OR = 3.38 [95% CI: 2.04-5.61]), B2 (OR = 5.26 [95% CI: 2.46-11.2]), B3 (OR = 4.28 [95% CI: 1.20-15.2]), B4 (OR = 7.59 [95% CI: 1.06-54.5]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest a significant association between the newly added \\\"chewing condition\\\" item in the questionnaire for specific health check-ups and oral status; the number of decayed teeth, periodontal pockets, Eichner's classification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"9-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2021-027-B\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2021-027-B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:近年来,世界范围内关于口腔健康状况与各种疾病之间关系的报道越来越多,人们越来越认识到口腔健康的重要性。本研究旨在调查口腔健康状况与咀嚼状况之间的关系,口腔健康状况是在牙齿健康检查后确定的,而咀嚼状况则是通过一份特定健康检查问卷来确定的,问卷中新增了咀嚼状况项目——你什么时候咀嚼食物,最准确地描述了你的咀嚼情况。方法:从2018年4月至2019年3月接受口腔健康检查和专项健康检查的20,834名日本工人中抽取4,011名男性工人(51.2±6.1岁,年龄范围40-64岁)作为研究对象。根据参与者对咀嚼状况问卷的回答,他们被分为两组,咀嚼状况良好组(GCG)和咀嚼状况不佳组(PCG)。我们收集并比较了受试者的年龄、吸烟状况、现有牙齿数量、补牙数量、蛀牙数量、假体治疗缺失牙齿数量、牙周袋、牙龈出血、口腔卫生状况和Eichner分类等数据。此外,为了明确咀嚼状况与风险的相关性,我们以咀嚼良好/咀嚼不良为因变量,以年龄、吸烟状况、牙齿数量、补牙数量、假体治疗缺失牙齿数量、牙周袋、口腔卫生状况和Eichner分类为自变量,进行逐步多元logistic回归分析。结果:经逐步多元logistic回归分析,最终模型中剩余因素的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(95% CI)如下:蛀牙数(OR = 1.18 [95% CI: 1.12-1.24]);牙周袋小于或等于3mm vs大于或等于6mm (or = 1.63 [95% CI: 1.12-2.37]);Eichner分类A1 vs A2 (OR = 1.40 [95% CI: 1.08-1.82])、A3 (OR = 1.66 [95% CI: 1.09-2.52])、B1 (OR = 3.38 [95% CI: 2.04-5.61])、B2 (OR = 5.26 [95% CI: 2.46-11.2])、B3 (OR = 4.28 [95% CI: 1.20-15.2])、B4 (OR = 7.59 [95% CI: 1.06-54.5])。结论:本研究结果提示,在专项健康检查问卷中新增的“咀嚼状况”项与口腔健康状况存在显著相关性;蛀牙的数量,牙周袋,艾希纳分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Evaluating the relationship between oral health status in male workers and question item regarding subjective chewing symptoms].

Objectives: In recent years, the relationship between oral health status and various diseases has been increasingly reported worldwide, leading to a growing understanding of the importance of oral health. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between oral health status, determined after a dental health check-up, and chewing condition, determined via a questionnaire for specific health check-ups with the newly added chewing condition item-When you chew your food, which most accurately describes your chewing-.

Methods: From 20,834 Japanese workers who underwent dental health check-ups and specific health check-ups from April 2018 to March 2019, 4,011 male workers (51.2 ± 6.1 years, range 40-64 years) were extracted for this study. Participants were divided into two groups, the good chewing condition group (GCG) and poor chewing condition group (PCG), according to their responses to a questionnaire regarding chewing conditions. We collected and compared data on subjects' age, smoking status, number of teeth present, number of filled teeth, number of decayed teeth, number of missing teeth with prosthetic treatment, periodontal pockets, gingival bleeding, oral hygiene status, and Eichner's classification. Additionally, to clarify the risk associated with chewing condition, we performed stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis with good chewing condition/poor chewing condition as the dependent variable, and age, smoking status, number of teeth present, number of filled teeth, number of missing teeth with prosthetic treatment, periodontal pockets, oral hygiene status, and Eichner's classification as the independent variables.

Results: The result of stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the factors that remained in the final model were as follows; the number of decayed teeth (OR = 1.18 [95% CI: 1.12-1.24]); periodontal pockets of 3 mm or less vs. 6 mm or more (OR = 1.63 [95% CI: 1.12-2.37]); Eichner's classification A1 vs. A2 (OR = 1.40 [95% CI: 1.08-1.82]), A3 (OR = 1.66 [95% CI: 1.09-2.52]), B1 (OR = 3.38 [95% CI: 2.04-5.61]), B2 (OR = 5.26 [95% CI: 2.46-11.2]), B3 (OR = 4.28 [95% CI: 1.20-15.2]), B4 (OR = 7.59 [95% CI: 1.06-54.5]).

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest a significant association between the newly added "chewing condition" item in the questionnaire for specific health check-ups and oral status; the number of decayed teeth, periodontal pockets, Eichner's classification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
[Selecting measurement subject workers for evaluation using a personal sampling method: a case involving analytical chemistry experiments at a university laboratory]. [The past and future of occupational health nursing research in Japan]. [Association between mental health, fear of COVID-19, and job insecurity among bus service workers during the COVID-19 pandemic]. [Convenient health initiatives to help small- and medium-sized enterprises with mental health, lifestyle-related diseases, and hazardous work]. [Development and validation of the University of Tokyo Occupational Mental Health leadership checklist among occupational health specialists].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1