将研究基础设施纳入传染病监测行动:重点放在生物库上

IF 3.5 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Biosafety and Health Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bsheal.2022.10.001
Plebeian B. Medina , Jennifer Kealy , Zisis Kozlakidis
{"title":"将研究基础设施纳入传染病监测行动:重点放在生物库上","authors":"Plebeian B. Medina ,&nbsp;Jennifer Kealy ,&nbsp;Zisis Kozlakidis","doi":"10.1016/j.bsheal.2022.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Technological advances in the first two decades of the 21<sup>st</sup> century have profoundly impacted medical research in many ways, with large population cohorts, biological sample collections and datasets through biobanks becoming valued global resources to guide biomedical research, drug development, and medical practice. However, in order for biobanks to maximize their impact and scientific reach of their resources, they would need to act within a complex network of infrastructures and activities. Therefore, different ways have emerged in which biobanks, including those for infectious diseases, can emerge as (part of) infrastructures, integrate within existing ones, or become an independent, yet an interoperable component of the existing infrastructural landscape. However, there has been a limited understanding and study of such mechanisms to date. This perspective aims to address this knowledge gap and illustrates these three high-level ways in which such infrastructures could integrate their activities and identifies the necessary key pre-conditions for doing so, while drawing from specific examples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36178,"journal":{"name":"Biosafety and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating research infrastructures into infectious diseases surveillance operations: Focus on biobanks\",\"authors\":\"Plebeian B. Medina ,&nbsp;Jennifer Kealy ,&nbsp;Zisis Kozlakidis\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bsheal.2022.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Technological advances in the first two decades of the 21<sup>st</sup> century have profoundly impacted medical research in many ways, with large population cohorts, biological sample collections and datasets through biobanks becoming valued global resources to guide biomedical research, drug development, and medical practice. However, in order for biobanks to maximize their impact and scientific reach of their resources, they would need to act within a complex network of infrastructures and activities. Therefore, different ways have emerged in which biobanks, including those for infectious diseases, can emerge as (part of) infrastructures, integrate within existing ones, or become an independent, yet an interoperable component of the existing infrastructural landscape. However, there has been a limited understanding and study of such mechanisms to date. This perspective aims to address this knowledge gap and illustrates these three high-level ways in which such infrastructures could integrate their activities and identifies the necessary key pre-conditions for doing so, while drawing from specific examples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biosafety and Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9750893/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biosafety and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590053622001525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosafety and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590053622001525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

21世纪头二十年的技术进步在许多方面深刻影响了医学研究,通过生物银行收集的大量人口、生物样本和数据集成为指导生物医学研究、药物开发和医疗实践的宝贵全球资源。然而,为了使生物银行最大限度地发挥其影响和其资源的科学覆盖范围,它们需要在一个复杂的基础设施和活动网络中行动。因此,出现了不同的方式,生物库,包括传染病生物库,可以作为基础设施(一部分)出现,与现有基础设施整合,或成为现有基础设施景观的一个独立但可互操作的组成部分。然而,迄今为止,对这种机制的理解和研究有限。这一观点旨在解决这一知识差距,并说明这些基础设施可以整合其活动的三种高级方法,并确定这样做的必要关键先决条件,同时借鉴具体的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrating research infrastructures into infectious diseases surveillance operations: Focus on biobanks

Technological advances in the first two decades of the 21st century have profoundly impacted medical research in many ways, with large population cohorts, biological sample collections and datasets through biobanks becoming valued global resources to guide biomedical research, drug development, and medical practice. However, in order for biobanks to maximize their impact and scientific reach of their resources, they would need to act within a complex network of infrastructures and activities. Therefore, different ways have emerged in which biobanks, including those for infectious diseases, can emerge as (part of) infrastructures, integrate within existing ones, or become an independent, yet an interoperable component of the existing infrastructural landscape. However, there has been a limited understanding and study of such mechanisms to date. This perspective aims to address this knowledge gap and illustrates these three high-level ways in which such infrastructures could integrate their activities and identifies the necessary key pre-conditions for doing so, while drawing from specific examples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biosafety and Health
Biosafety and Health Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Establishment of the benchmarking tool for evaluating the operation of biorepositories for pathogenic resource using a modified Delphi method An online survey among convalescents 5 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection in China Relationship between climatic factors and the flea index of two plague hosts in Xilingol League, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Automated robot and artificial intelligence-powered wastewater surveillance for proactive mpox outbreak prediction The differential effects of integrase strand transfer inhibitors and efavirenz on neuropsychiatric conditions and brain imaging in HIV-positive men who have sex with men
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1