基于叶片和有限元分析软件的海上浮式风力基础内部荷载计算方法

A. Alexandre, Ricard Buils Urbano, John Roadnight, R. Harries
{"title":"基于叶片和有限元分析软件的海上浮式风力基础内部荷载计算方法","authors":"A. Alexandre, Ricard Buils Urbano, John Roadnight, R. Harries","doi":"10.1115/OMAE2018-78035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the recent years, the floating offshore wind industry has developed quickly and most authors are now converging towards the need of a coupled loads analysis using aero-hydro-servo-elastic software on time domain simulations for floating foundations design. Different hydrodynamic theories still exist and their application depends on the floating platform characteristics. The Morison equation and the boundary element method (BEM, not to be confused with the Blade Element Momentum theory) theory approaches are often used in combination on the same platform model, sometimes applied to different elements of the same structure depending on their shape.\n When using the potential flow theory approach calculating internal distributed loads and later on transferring them to stress for hull design purposes is still a challenge due to the large ammount of load cases needed and the complexity of the structure. Furthermore, accounting for platform flexibility is also difficult in most codes using BEM theory due to the same reasons. Different approaches have been proposed by different authors, and currently there is not a single best industry practice for this.\n This paper presents a method for accounting for platform flexibility when using BEM theory. A range of methods for the load to stress transfer are also presented and the advantages and disadvantages between them are discussed. The choice of one or another method will depend heavily on the platform structure, and different methods might be used and combined for the same platform depending on the shape of the different elements within it.\n The different methods presented here involve performing coupled loads analysis using the aero-elastic software Bladed and multiple bodies to represent the floating platform in order to obtain internal loads at different points in the structure, as well as allowing for platform flexiblity modelling. Bladed can model multiple hydrodynamic bodies including the hydrodynamic effects between (e.g. coupled terms in the radiation force). The approach used in the current study is based on a platform modelled with the hydrodynamic loading distributed over independent sections, but originally computed from a single body BEM calculation. This simplification offers significant gains in computational efficiency and is expected to be valid for many types of floating structure, whist still allowing for some platform flexiblity to be modelled.\n The simulation resultant time series can later on be postprocessed to obtain distributed pressure forces on the platform wetted surface and transfer those onto a Finite Element code. Different options are presented here on how to perform this last step for both extreme and fatigue analysis of the hull structure. A couple of examples are shown using the OC3 spar and OC4 semisubmersible, focusing on a subsection of the structures to demonstrate the methodology.","PeriodicalId":306681,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodology for Calculating Floating Offshore Wind Foundation Internal Loads Using Bladed and a Finite Element Analysis Software\",\"authors\":\"A. Alexandre, Ricard Buils Urbano, John Roadnight, R. Harries\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/OMAE2018-78035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the recent years, the floating offshore wind industry has developed quickly and most authors are now converging towards the need of a coupled loads analysis using aero-hydro-servo-elastic software on time domain simulations for floating foundations design. Different hydrodynamic theories still exist and their application depends on the floating platform characteristics. The Morison equation and the boundary element method (BEM, not to be confused with the Blade Element Momentum theory) theory approaches are often used in combination on the same platform model, sometimes applied to different elements of the same structure depending on their shape.\\n When using the potential flow theory approach calculating internal distributed loads and later on transferring them to stress for hull design purposes is still a challenge due to the large ammount of load cases needed and the complexity of the structure. Furthermore, accounting for platform flexibility is also difficult in most codes using BEM theory due to the same reasons. Different approaches have been proposed by different authors, and currently there is not a single best industry practice for this.\\n This paper presents a method for accounting for platform flexibility when using BEM theory. A range of methods for the load to stress transfer are also presented and the advantages and disadvantages between them are discussed. The choice of one or another method will depend heavily on the platform structure, and different methods might be used and combined for the same platform depending on the shape of the different elements within it.\\n The different methods presented here involve performing coupled loads analysis using the aero-elastic software Bladed and multiple bodies to represent the floating platform in order to obtain internal loads at different points in the structure, as well as allowing for platform flexiblity modelling. Bladed can model multiple hydrodynamic bodies including the hydrodynamic effects between (e.g. coupled terms in the radiation force). The approach used in the current study is based on a platform modelled with the hydrodynamic loading distributed over independent sections, but originally computed from a single body BEM calculation. This simplification offers significant gains in computational efficiency and is expected to be valid for many types of floating structure, whist still allowing for some platform flexiblity to be modelled.\\n The simulation resultant time series can later on be postprocessed to obtain distributed pressure forces on the platform wetted surface and transfer those onto a Finite Element code. Different options are presented here on how to perform this last step for both extreme and fatigue analysis of the hull structure. A couple of examples are shown using the OC3 spar and OC4 semisubmersible, focusing on a subsection of the structures to demonstrate the methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-78035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-78035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

近年来,浮式海上风电产业发展迅速,大多数作者都认为需要在浮式基础设计的时域仿真中使用气动-液压-伺服-弹性软件进行耦合载荷分析。不同的水动力理论仍然存在,它们的应用取决于浮动平台的特性。莫里森方程和边界元法(BEM,不要与叶片单元动量理论混淆)理论方法经常在同一平台模型上组合使用,有时根据其形状应用于同一结构的不同单元。由于需要大量的载荷情况和结构的复杂性,当使用势流理论方法计算内部分布载荷并随后将其转换为船体设计的应力时,仍然是一个挑战。此外,由于同样的原因,在大多数使用边界元理论的代码中,考虑平台灵活性也很困难。不同的作者提出了不同的方法,目前还没有一个最佳的行业实践。本文提出了一种利用边界元理论计算平台灵活性的方法。本文还介绍了各种载荷-应力传递方法,并讨论了它们之间的优缺点。一种或另一种方法的选择将在很大程度上取决于平台结构,并且根据平台内不同元素的形状,可能会对同一平台使用不同的方法并将其组合在一起。这里提出的不同方法包括使用气动弹性软件Bladed和多体来表示浮动平台进行耦合载荷分析,以获得结构中不同点的内部载荷,并允许平台灵活性建模。叶片可以模拟多个水动力体,包括水动力之间的影响(例如辐射力中的耦合项)。当前研究中使用的方法是基于一个平台,该平台的水动力载荷分布在独立的截面上,但最初是通过单个体边界元计算来计算的。这种简化大大提高了计算效率,并有望适用于许多类型的浮动结构,同时仍然允许一些平台的灵活性建模。模拟结果的时间序列可以随后进行后处理,以获得平台湿表面上的分布压力,并将其传递到有限元程序中。对于船体结构的极端和疲劳分析,如何执行最后一步,这里给出了不同的选择。本文展示了使用OC3桅杆和OC4半潜式的几个示例,重点介绍了结构的一部分来演示该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methodology for Calculating Floating Offshore Wind Foundation Internal Loads Using Bladed and a Finite Element Analysis Software
In the recent years, the floating offshore wind industry has developed quickly and most authors are now converging towards the need of a coupled loads analysis using aero-hydro-servo-elastic software on time domain simulations for floating foundations design. Different hydrodynamic theories still exist and their application depends on the floating platform characteristics. The Morison equation and the boundary element method (BEM, not to be confused with the Blade Element Momentum theory) theory approaches are often used in combination on the same platform model, sometimes applied to different elements of the same structure depending on their shape. When using the potential flow theory approach calculating internal distributed loads and later on transferring them to stress for hull design purposes is still a challenge due to the large ammount of load cases needed and the complexity of the structure. Furthermore, accounting for platform flexibility is also difficult in most codes using BEM theory due to the same reasons. Different approaches have been proposed by different authors, and currently there is not a single best industry practice for this. This paper presents a method for accounting for platform flexibility when using BEM theory. A range of methods for the load to stress transfer are also presented and the advantages and disadvantages between them are discussed. The choice of one or another method will depend heavily on the platform structure, and different methods might be used and combined for the same platform depending on the shape of the different elements within it. The different methods presented here involve performing coupled loads analysis using the aero-elastic software Bladed and multiple bodies to represent the floating platform in order to obtain internal loads at different points in the structure, as well as allowing for platform flexiblity modelling. Bladed can model multiple hydrodynamic bodies including the hydrodynamic effects between (e.g. coupled terms in the radiation force). The approach used in the current study is based on a platform modelled with the hydrodynamic loading distributed over independent sections, but originally computed from a single body BEM calculation. This simplification offers significant gains in computational efficiency and is expected to be valid for many types of floating structure, whist still allowing for some platform flexiblity to be modelled. The simulation resultant time series can later on be postprocessed to obtain distributed pressure forces on the platform wetted surface and transfer those onto a Finite Element code. Different options are presented here on how to perform this last step for both extreme and fatigue analysis of the hull structure. A couple of examples are shown using the OC3 spar and OC4 semisubmersible, focusing on a subsection of the structures to demonstrate the methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FIV Energy Harvesting From Sharp-Edge Oscillators On Design and Analysis of a Drivetrain Test Rig for Wind Turbine Health Monitoring The Influence of Tidal Unsteadiness on a Tidal Turbine Blade Flow-Induced Vibration Learning a Predictionless Resonating Controller for Wave Energy Converters Performance of a Passive Tuned Liquid Column Damper for Floating Wind Turbines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1