{"title":"沟通的意图","authors":"P. Livet, P. Ridel","doi":"10.3406/RESO.1994.3265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: Analysis of communication usually strives to define the conditions for successful communication either in terms of tautologous definitions or by requiring an impossible use of reflexive talents. This article offers a critique of the pragmatists 'theory of 'model' communication through a consideration of three levels of interaction: informative intention, communicative intention and the intention to communicate.","PeriodicalId":213999,"journal":{"name":"Réseaux. The French journal of communication","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The intentions of communication\",\"authors\":\"P. Livet, P. Ridel\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/RESO.1994.3265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary: Analysis of communication usually strives to define the conditions for successful communication either in terms of tautologous definitions or by requiring an impossible use of reflexive talents. This article offers a critique of the pragmatists 'theory of 'model' communication through a consideration of three levels of interaction: informative intention, communicative intention and the intention to communicate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Réseaux. The French journal of communication\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Réseaux. The French journal of communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/RESO.1994.3265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Réseaux. The French journal of communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/RESO.1994.3265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Summary: Analysis of communication usually strives to define the conditions for successful communication either in terms of tautologous definitions or by requiring an impossible use of reflexive talents. This article offers a critique of the pragmatists 'theory of 'model' communication through a consideration of three levels of interaction: informative intention, communicative intention and the intention to communicate.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
