责任与环境

L. Bergkamp
{"title":"责任与环境","authors":"L. Bergkamp","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.266365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Liability and Environment\" by Prof. Lucas Bergkamp analyzes the role of law, in particular civil liability, in controlling environmental pollution and risk. In modern environmental policy, liability has become a popular instrument. In this book, Prof. Bergkamp takes a fresh look at civil liability for environmental harm in an inter- and transnational context. Over the last decades, environmental regulations have mushroomed, and liability exposure for environmental harm has expanded significantly. At the international, EC, and national level further proposals for onerous strict environmental liability regimes are pending. The \"polluter pays principle,\" which is an articulation of the \"cost internalization\" theory in the environmental area, is believed to justify such liability regimes. Applying an instrumental approach to law, Prof. Bergkamp aims to redefine the role of liability in the heavily regulated environmental area. He shows that in the regulatory state liability for environmental harm is not required by the polluter pays principle, is an uncertain and unreliable instrument for achieving prevention, results in an inefficient insurance scheme, and plays a dubious role in adjusting activity levels. Based on an analysis of the basic characteristics of alternative legal instruments, Prof. Bergkamp concludes that civil liability should play a more modest, limited role in an environmental law system dominated by public law. Where deterrence is the objective, objective fault liability can play a useful role as a sanction for violations of applicable standards. Where deterrence is not the objective, first party insurance or other public law regimes should be preferred over liability rules. In addition to civil liability of private parties, \"Liability and Environment\" discusses state liability under international, EC, and national law. Under international and EC law, breach of a primary obligation triggers a state's liability. Prof. Bergkamp argues that this rule should be applied also to liability of private parties. In the environmental area, a business' primary obligations are spelled out in detailed permit conditions, regulations and statutes. According to Prof. Bergkamp, only if a polluter breached a primary obligation, he should be liable for environmental harm. The system that Bergkamp advocates is an objective fault liability regime, in which public environmental law defines the standard of care for both government and industry. \"In rebuilding our civil liability system, we should keep in mind that what we believe to be good for industry should be good for every one (or it is not good for anyone), and what is good for private parties should be good for the state (or it is not good for either). In rebuilding our civil liability system, the international law of state responsibility, which is unpolluted by risk spreading and activity level considerations, will guide us a long way.\" \"Liability and Environment\" covers also current trends and controversial issues in environmental law. It, for instance, analyzes corporate veil piercing theories that are invoked to impose liability on shareholders, and liability for natural resource damage and related assessment and valuation issues. Unreserved discussions address such topics as the \"stakeholder\" model of the corporation, sustainable development, and risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis. Following an assessment of the concepts of market and government failure, prof. Bergkamp presents a default-displacement model of liability, in which liability essentially serves as a \"stopgap\" against abnormal behavior in areas that are not yet regulated and as a sanction in regulated areas. This book is aimed at advanced law students, academic scholars, and practitioners. In addition, it is of interest to policy and legislative analysts, legislators, and government officials. Economists, philosophers, free trade and laissez faire-supporters, as well as environmentalists may benefit from its wide-ranging, thought-provoking perspectives. In the engaging analysis presented in the book, many current issues of modern environmental law and policy are discussed. It is written in plain, direct language, and tries to avoid excessive use of legalese and technical terminology, so that it is accessible to any reader.","PeriodicalId":168354,"journal":{"name":"Torts & Products Liability Law","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liability and Environment\",\"authors\":\"L. Bergkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.266365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Liability and Environment\\\" by Prof. Lucas Bergkamp analyzes the role of law, in particular civil liability, in controlling environmental pollution and risk. In modern environmental policy, liability has become a popular instrument. In this book, Prof. Bergkamp takes a fresh look at civil liability for environmental harm in an inter- and transnational context. Over the last decades, environmental regulations have mushroomed, and liability exposure for environmental harm has expanded significantly. At the international, EC, and national level further proposals for onerous strict environmental liability regimes are pending. The \\\"polluter pays principle,\\\" which is an articulation of the \\\"cost internalization\\\" theory in the environmental area, is believed to justify such liability regimes. Applying an instrumental approach to law, Prof. Bergkamp aims to redefine the role of liability in the heavily regulated environmental area. He shows that in the regulatory state liability for environmental harm is not required by the polluter pays principle, is an uncertain and unreliable instrument for achieving prevention, results in an inefficient insurance scheme, and plays a dubious role in adjusting activity levels. Based on an analysis of the basic characteristics of alternative legal instruments, Prof. Bergkamp concludes that civil liability should play a more modest, limited role in an environmental law system dominated by public law. Where deterrence is the objective, objective fault liability can play a useful role as a sanction for violations of applicable standards. Where deterrence is not the objective, first party insurance or other public law regimes should be preferred over liability rules. In addition to civil liability of private parties, \\\"Liability and Environment\\\" discusses state liability under international, EC, and national law. Under international and EC law, breach of a primary obligation triggers a state's liability. Prof. Bergkamp argues that this rule should be applied also to liability of private parties. In the environmental area, a business' primary obligations are spelled out in detailed permit conditions, regulations and statutes. According to Prof. Bergkamp, only if a polluter breached a primary obligation, he should be liable for environmental harm. The system that Bergkamp advocates is an objective fault liability regime, in which public environmental law defines the standard of care for both government and industry. \\\"In rebuilding our civil liability system, we should keep in mind that what we believe to be good for industry should be good for every one (or it is not good for anyone), and what is good for private parties should be good for the state (or it is not good for either). In rebuilding our civil liability system, the international law of state responsibility, which is unpolluted by risk spreading and activity level considerations, will guide us a long way.\\\" \\\"Liability and Environment\\\" covers also current trends and controversial issues in environmental law. It, for instance, analyzes corporate veil piercing theories that are invoked to impose liability on shareholders, and liability for natural resource damage and related assessment and valuation issues. Unreserved discussions address such topics as the \\\"stakeholder\\\" model of the corporation, sustainable development, and risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis. Following an assessment of the concepts of market and government failure, prof. Bergkamp presents a default-displacement model of liability, in which liability essentially serves as a \\\"stopgap\\\" against abnormal behavior in areas that are not yet regulated and as a sanction in regulated areas. This book is aimed at advanced law students, academic scholars, and practitioners. In addition, it is of interest to policy and legislative analysts, legislators, and government officials. Economists, philosophers, free trade and laissez faire-supporters, as well as environmentalists may benefit from its wide-ranging, thought-provoking perspectives. In the engaging analysis presented in the book, many current issues of modern environmental law and policy are discussed. It is written in plain, direct language, and tries to avoid excessive use of legalese and technical terminology, so that it is accessible to any reader.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Torts & Products Liability Law\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Torts & Products Liability Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.266365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Torts & Products Liability Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.266365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

卢卡斯·博格坎普教授的《责任与环境》分析了法律,特别是民事责任在控制环境污染和风险方面的作用。在现代环境政策中,责任已成为一种流行的工具。在这本书中,博格坎普教授对国际和跨国背景下环境损害的民事责任进行了全新的审视。在过去的几十年里,环境法规如雨后春笋般涌现,环境损害的责任暴露也显著扩大。在国际、欧共体和国家一级,关于繁重严格的环境责任制度的进一步建议正在等待中。“污染者付费原则”是环境领域“成本内部化”理论的一种表述,人们认为这种责任制度是合理的。博格坎普教授运用工具性的法律方法,旨在重新定义在严格监管的环境领域责任的作用。他表明,在监管国家对环境损害的责任不需要污染者支付原则,是实现预防的不确定和不可靠的工具,导致低效的保险计划,并在调整活动水平方面发挥可疑的作用。在分析替代性法律文书的基本特征的基础上,博格坎普教授得出结论认为,在公法主导的环境法体系中,民事责任应发挥较为温和和有限的作用。当威慑是目标时,客观过失责任可以作为对违反适用标准的制裁发挥有益的作用。如果威慑不是目的,第一方保险或其他公法制度应优先于责任规则。除了私人当事人的民事责任外,“责任与环境”还讨论了国际法、欧共体法和国内法下的国家责任。根据国际法和欧共体法,违反主要义务会引发国家的责任。博格坎普教授认为,这一规则也应适用于私人当事人的责任。在环境方面,企业的主要义务在详细的许可证条件、规章和法规中都有详细说明。博格坎普教授认为,只有当污染者违反了主要义务时,他才应对环境损害负责。博格坎普倡导的制度是客观过失责任制度,其中公共环境法规定了政府和行业的注意标准。“在重建我们的民事责任制度时,我们应该记住,我们认为对行业有利的东西应该对每个人都有利(或者对任何人都不利),对私人有利的东西应该对国家有利(或者对两者都不利)。”在重建我国的民事责任制度时,不受风险扩散和活动水平考虑影响的国家责任国际法将对我们有很长的指导作用。”“责任与环境”还涵盖了环境法的当前趋势和有争议的问题。例如,它分析了用来对股东施加责任的公司面纱穿透理论,以及对自然资源损害的责任和相关的评估和估值问题。毫无保留的讨论涉及诸如公司的“利益相关者”模型、可持续发展、风险评估和成本效益分析等主题。在对市场和政府失灵的概念进行评估之后,博格坎普教授提出了一种责任的违约-位移模型,其中责任本质上是对尚未监管领域的异常行为的“权宜之计”,是监管领域的一种制裁。这本书是针对先进的法律学生,学术学者和从业者。此外,政策和立法分析人士、立法者和政府官员也对此感兴趣。经济学家、哲学家、自由贸易和自由放任政策的支持者,以及环保主义者,都可能受益于这本书内容广泛、发人深省的观点。在书中提出的引人入胜的分析中,讨论了现代环境法和政策的许多当前问题。它是用简单、直接的语言写的,并尽量避免过多地使用法律术语和技术术语,所以它是任何读者都能理解的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liability and Environment
"Liability and Environment" by Prof. Lucas Bergkamp analyzes the role of law, in particular civil liability, in controlling environmental pollution and risk. In modern environmental policy, liability has become a popular instrument. In this book, Prof. Bergkamp takes a fresh look at civil liability for environmental harm in an inter- and transnational context. Over the last decades, environmental regulations have mushroomed, and liability exposure for environmental harm has expanded significantly. At the international, EC, and national level further proposals for onerous strict environmental liability regimes are pending. The "polluter pays principle," which is an articulation of the "cost internalization" theory in the environmental area, is believed to justify such liability regimes. Applying an instrumental approach to law, Prof. Bergkamp aims to redefine the role of liability in the heavily regulated environmental area. He shows that in the regulatory state liability for environmental harm is not required by the polluter pays principle, is an uncertain and unreliable instrument for achieving prevention, results in an inefficient insurance scheme, and plays a dubious role in adjusting activity levels. Based on an analysis of the basic characteristics of alternative legal instruments, Prof. Bergkamp concludes that civil liability should play a more modest, limited role in an environmental law system dominated by public law. Where deterrence is the objective, objective fault liability can play a useful role as a sanction for violations of applicable standards. Where deterrence is not the objective, first party insurance or other public law regimes should be preferred over liability rules. In addition to civil liability of private parties, "Liability and Environment" discusses state liability under international, EC, and national law. Under international and EC law, breach of a primary obligation triggers a state's liability. Prof. Bergkamp argues that this rule should be applied also to liability of private parties. In the environmental area, a business' primary obligations are spelled out in detailed permit conditions, regulations and statutes. According to Prof. Bergkamp, only if a polluter breached a primary obligation, he should be liable for environmental harm. The system that Bergkamp advocates is an objective fault liability regime, in which public environmental law defines the standard of care for both government and industry. "In rebuilding our civil liability system, we should keep in mind that what we believe to be good for industry should be good for every one (or it is not good for anyone), and what is good for private parties should be good for the state (or it is not good for either). In rebuilding our civil liability system, the international law of state responsibility, which is unpolluted by risk spreading and activity level considerations, will guide us a long way." "Liability and Environment" covers also current trends and controversial issues in environmental law. It, for instance, analyzes corporate veil piercing theories that are invoked to impose liability on shareholders, and liability for natural resource damage and related assessment and valuation issues. Unreserved discussions address such topics as the "stakeholder" model of the corporation, sustainable development, and risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis. Following an assessment of the concepts of market and government failure, prof. Bergkamp presents a default-displacement model of liability, in which liability essentially serves as a "stopgap" against abnormal behavior in areas that are not yet regulated and as a sanction in regulated areas. This book is aimed at advanced law students, academic scholars, and practitioners. In addition, it is of interest to policy and legislative analysts, legislators, and government officials. Economists, philosophers, free trade and laissez faire-supporters, as well as environmentalists may benefit from its wide-ranging, thought-provoking perspectives. In the engaging analysis presented in the book, many current issues of modern environmental law and policy are discussed. It is written in plain, direct language, and tries to avoid excessive use of legalese and technical terminology, so that it is accessible to any reader.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Dynamic Model of Lawsuit Joinder and Settlement Quantitative Proof of Reputational Harm Injuries, Damages and a Puzzle: Can an Effect Ever Precede its Cause Efficiency, Fairness, and the Economic Analysis of Tort Law Fault at the Contract-Tort Interface
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1