水资源管理中气候变化适应政策优先化的经济评估

Yongjoon Kim, Sung-Eun Yoo, Bang Ji Won, Kwan Soo Kim, An, Donghwan
{"title":"水资源管理中气候变化适应政策优先化的经济评估","authors":"Yongjoon Kim, Sung-Eun Yoo, Bang Ji Won, Kwan Soo Kim, An, Donghwan","doi":"10.24997/kjae.2019.60.3.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water management issue is recognized as one of the main concerns of climate change due to an increasing level of drought in terms of its magnitude and severity. This paper tries to prioritize water management-related climate change adaptation policies based on a probabilistic CBA (Cost-Benefit Analysis) approach. First, we classify adaptation policies into four types and evaluate the BCR (Benefit-Cost Ratio) of each type. Second, the risk premium of each adaptation policy type is evaluated, and the BCR is reestimated after taking risk premium results into consideration. Lastly, we found that the estimated probabilistic distribution function of the BCR revealed a remarkable result: “the economically feasible adaptation policy type evaluated at an average can be economically unviable with a probability of 29.38% (RCP 8.5).” In conclusion, the estimated results show that the BCR is hardly over unity, and the priority of adaptation policy can be different when uncertainty effects of climate change associated with extreme weather events are taken into consideration.","PeriodicalId":136411,"journal":{"name":"Korean Agricultural Economics Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Economic Assessment on Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptation Policies in Water Management\",\"authors\":\"Yongjoon Kim, Sung-Eun Yoo, Bang Ji Won, Kwan Soo Kim, An, Donghwan\",\"doi\":\"10.24997/kjae.2019.60.3.177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Water management issue is recognized as one of the main concerns of climate change due to an increasing level of drought in terms of its magnitude and severity. This paper tries to prioritize water management-related climate change adaptation policies based on a probabilistic CBA (Cost-Benefit Analysis) approach. First, we classify adaptation policies into four types and evaluate the BCR (Benefit-Cost Ratio) of each type. Second, the risk premium of each adaptation policy type is evaluated, and the BCR is reestimated after taking risk premium results into consideration. Lastly, we found that the estimated probabilistic distribution function of the BCR revealed a remarkable result: “the economically feasible adaptation policy type evaluated at an average can be economically unviable with a probability of 29.38% (RCP 8.5).” In conclusion, the estimated results show that the BCR is hardly over unity, and the priority of adaptation policy can be different when uncertainty effects of climate change associated with extreme weather events are taken into consideration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Agricultural Economics Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Agricultural Economics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24997/kjae.2019.60.3.177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Agricultural Economics Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24997/kjae.2019.60.3.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水管理问题被认为是气候变化的主要问题之一,因为干旱的程度和严重程度越来越高。本文尝试基于概率CBA(成本效益分析)方法对水资源管理相关的气候变化适应政策进行排序。首先,我们将适应政策分为四种类型,并评估了每种类型的BCR(效益成本比)。其次,评估了各适应政策类型的风险溢价,并在考虑风险溢价结果后重新估计了BCR。最后,我们发现BCR的估计概率分布函数揭示了一个显著的结果:“经济上可行的适应政策类型在平均评估时经济上不可行的概率为29.38% (RCP 8.5)。”综上所述,估算结果表明,当考虑与极端天气事件相关的气候变化不确定性效应时,适应政策的优先级可能会有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Economic Assessment on Prioritizing Climate Change Adaptation Policies in Water Management
Water management issue is recognized as one of the main concerns of climate change due to an increasing level of drought in terms of its magnitude and severity. This paper tries to prioritize water management-related climate change adaptation policies based on a probabilistic CBA (Cost-Benefit Analysis) approach. First, we classify adaptation policies into four types and evaluate the BCR (Benefit-Cost Ratio) of each type. Second, the risk premium of each adaptation policy type is evaluated, and the BCR is reestimated after taking risk premium results into consideration. Lastly, we found that the estimated probabilistic distribution function of the BCR revealed a remarkable result: “the economically feasible adaptation policy type evaluated at an average can be economically unviable with a probability of 29.38% (RCP 8.5).” In conclusion, the estimated results show that the BCR is hardly over unity, and the priority of adaptation policy can be different when uncertainty effects of climate change associated with extreme weather events are taken into consideration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring Beef Demand by Country of Origin and Cooking Purpose: The Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value Model Approach Can Cheap Talk Eliminate the House Money Effect in Apple Experimental Auction? Assessing the effects of changes in Hanwoo breeding cow population on equilibrium using Multimarket Partial Equilibrium model The potential of the mobile application as a food waste reduction alternative Analysis of the bulb weight of garlic with a focus on sample selection bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1