信息利用的定量与定性度量的关系

B. Booske, F. Sainfort
{"title":"信息利用的定量与定性度量的关系","authors":"B. Booske, F. Sainfort","doi":"10.1207/s15327590ijhc1001_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding how people use information and measuring information use are essential in the successful design and testing of information technologies. This study reports on the relation between selected quantitative and qualitative approaches of measuring the use of information in the context of making decisions. Four quantitative measures were developed: information access, information time, search redundancy, and time per access. Three qualitative constructs were developed addressing participant reports of the amount of information, the usability of the information, and the adequacy of the information. The context for the study is the choice of a health plan. A Windows-based system was developed with process-tracing capabilities to track participants' information search patterns. Analysis of variance and correlation analysis showed relations between the quantitative measure of information access and the qualitative measures of amount of information and between information time and one component of the a...","PeriodicalId":208962,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relation Between Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Information Use\",\"authors\":\"B. Booske, F. Sainfort\",\"doi\":\"10.1207/s15327590ijhc1001_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding how people use information and measuring information use are essential in the successful design and testing of information technologies. This study reports on the relation between selected quantitative and qualitative approaches of measuring the use of information in the context of making decisions. Four quantitative measures were developed: information access, information time, search redundancy, and time per access. Three qualitative constructs were developed addressing participant reports of the amount of information, the usability of the information, and the adequacy of the information. The context for the study is the choice of a health plan. A Windows-based system was developed with process-tracing capabilities to track participants' information search patterns. Analysis of variance and correlation analysis showed relations between the quantitative measure of information access and the qualitative measures of amount of information and between information time and one component of the a...\",\"PeriodicalId\":208962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1001_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1001_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

了解人们如何使用信息和衡量信息使用是信息技术成功设计和测试的关键。本研究报告了在决策过程中测量信息使用情况的定量和定性方法之间的关系。开发了四个定量度量:信息访问、信息时间、搜索冗余和每次访问时间。开发了三个定性结构来处理参与者报告的信息量、信息的可用性和信息的充分性。这项研究的背景是健康计划的选择。开发了一个基于windows的系统,具有过程跟踪功能,可以跟踪参与者的信息搜索模式。方差分析和相关分析表明,信息获取的定量指标与信息量的定性指标之间存在一定的关系,信息时间与信息量的一个分量之间存在一定的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relation Between Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Information Use
Understanding how people use information and measuring information use are essential in the successful design and testing of information technologies. This study reports on the relation between selected quantitative and qualitative approaches of measuring the use of information in the context of making decisions. Four quantitative measures were developed: information access, information time, search redundancy, and time per access. Three qualitative constructs were developed addressing participant reports of the amount of information, the usability of the information, and the adequacy of the information. The context for the study is the choice of a health plan. A Windows-based system was developed with process-tracing capabilities to track participants' information search patterns. Analysis of variance and correlation analysis showed relations between the quantitative measure of information access and the qualitative measures of amount of information and between information time and one component of the a...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usability Inspection by Metaphors of Human Thinking Compared to Heuristic Evaluation Templates for Search Queries: A User-Centered Feature for Improving Web Search Tools A Corporate Style Guide That Includes Domain Knowledge Identification of an Acceptable Mixture of Key and Speech Inputs in Bimodal Interfaces Decision Support for Indexing and Retrieval of Information in Hypertext Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1