2010年,印尼血液透析服务安排812号决议实施

Desi Fitria Neti, Ayurisya Dominata
{"title":"2010年,印尼血液透析服务安排812号决议实施","authors":"Desi Fitria Neti, Ayurisya Dominata","doi":"10.22435/jpppk.v0i0.4325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \nImplementasi Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan (Permenkes) RI No. 812 tahun 2010 tentang penyelenggaraan pelayanan dialisis pada fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan (yankes) di Indonesia menimbulkan masalah bagi penderita gagal ginjal kronis. Kajian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif, teknik pengumpulan data melalui tinjauan pustaka pada sejumlah artikel, laporan penelitian, dan jurnal serta diskusi/konsultasi melalui daring. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan teori Miles & Hubermans. Kajian dilakukan dari bulan Desember 2020 s.d. Maret 2021. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa implementasi Permenkes No. 812/2010 tentang penyelenggaraan pelayanan dialisis pada fasilitas yankes (fasyankes) belum optimal. Ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana, sumber daya manusia (SDM), alat, mesin, cairan dialisat, dan obat belum terbagi merata di seluruh Indonesia. Banyak pasien belum mendapatkan pelayanan hemodialisis (HD) 2 kali seminggu. Jumlah pasien dialisis terus meningkat, sekitar 20 ribu pasien belum mendapatkan akses pengobatan, pemilihan jenis terapi HD dan continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) yang dilaksanakan sesuai rekomendasi dokter. Pasien belum mendapat dosis obat dan waktu HD yang cukup karena berbagai kendala. RS/Klinik belum melakukan kunjungan rumah dalam rangka edukasi dan pemantauan, pasien dialisis berpotensi mengalami komplikasi/infeksi/kematian (drop out). Monev belum berjalan optimal, pembiayaan HD lebih mahal dari CAPD membebani keuangan negara, pelatihan dialisis masih minim di RS/Klinik. Kebijakan pelayanan dialisis saat ini belum terpadu. Belum ada pencerahan rohani dan kewajiban pencabutan/pemotongan alat dialisis bagi pasien muslim ketika sudah meninggal di rumah. Kajian ini merekomendasikan perlu melakukan perubahan Permenkes No. 812 tahun 2010 pasal 15 ayat 1 dan 2, seiring dengan upaya yang bisa dilakukan oleh Kementerian Kesehatan, Dinas Kesehatan dan Rumah Sakit dalam memperkuat sistem kesehatan dan mutu pelayanan bagi pasien dialisis. \nKata kunci: Kebijakan Kesehatan, Pelayanan Dialisis, Penyakit Gagal Ginjal \nAbstract \nImplementation of Permenkes No. 812 of 2010 concerning the implementation of dialysis services in health facilities in Indonesia causing problems for people with cordic kidney failure. This study uses qualitative descriptive methods, data collection techniques through literature reviews in a number of articles, research reports, and journals and discussions / consultations through online. The data was obtained in the analysis with miles hubermans theory. Conducted from December 2020 to March 2021. The results concluded that the implementation of Permenkes No. 812/2010 on The Implementation of Dialysis Services in Health Care Facilities has not been optimal. The availability of facilities and infrastructure, human resources, tools, machinery, dialysis fluids, and drugs has not been evenly divided throughout Indonesia. Many patients do not get hemodialysis therapy (HD) services twice a week. Dialysis patients continue to increase, about 20 thousand patients have not received access to treatment, the selection of types of hemodialysis therapy HD and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) implemented according to the recommendations of doctors. Patients have not received enough HD doses drugs and time due to various obstacles. Hospitals /Clinics have not made home visits in the framework of education and monitoring, dialysis patients have the potential to experience complications / infections / deaths (droup out). Monev has not run optimally, HD financing is more expensive than CAPD burdening the country’s finances, dialysis training is still minimal in hospitals / clinics. The current dialysis service policy is not yet integrated. There has been no spiritual revocation and obligation to revocation/cut dialysis equipment for Muslim patients when they have died at home. This study of authors recommends policy solutions that need changes to Permenkes No. 812 of 2010 article 15 paragraphs 1 and 2. And concrete efforts that can be done by the Ministry of Health, Hospitals, and Health Services. \nKeywords: Health Policy, Dialysis Services, Kidney Failure.","PeriodicalId":170797,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesehatan","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementasi Permenkes Nomor 812 Tahun 2010 tentang Tata Laksana Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Hemodialisis di Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Desi Fitria Neti, Ayurisya Dominata\",\"doi\":\"10.22435/jpppk.v0i0.4325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstrak \\nImplementasi Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan (Permenkes) RI No. 812 tahun 2010 tentang penyelenggaraan pelayanan dialisis pada fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan (yankes) di Indonesia menimbulkan masalah bagi penderita gagal ginjal kronis. Kajian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif, teknik pengumpulan data melalui tinjauan pustaka pada sejumlah artikel, laporan penelitian, dan jurnal serta diskusi/konsultasi melalui daring. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan teori Miles & Hubermans. Kajian dilakukan dari bulan Desember 2020 s.d. Maret 2021. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa implementasi Permenkes No. 812/2010 tentang penyelenggaraan pelayanan dialisis pada fasilitas yankes (fasyankes) belum optimal. Ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana, sumber daya manusia (SDM), alat, mesin, cairan dialisat, dan obat belum terbagi merata di seluruh Indonesia. Banyak pasien belum mendapatkan pelayanan hemodialisis (HD) 2 kali seminggu. Jumlah pasien dialisis terus meningkat, sekitar 20 ribu pasien belum mendapatkan akses pengobatan, pemilihan jenis terapi HD dan continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) yang dilaksanakan sesuai rekomendasi dokter. Pasien belum mendapat dosis obat dan waktu HD yang cukup karena berbagai kendala. RS/Klinik belum melakukan kunjungan rumah dalam rangka edukasi dan pemantauan, pasien dialisis berpotensi mengalami komplikasi/infeksi/kematian (drop out). Monev belum berjalan optimal, pembiayaan HD lebih mahal dari CAPD membebani keuangan negara, pelatihan dialisis masih minim di RS/Klinik. Kebijakan pelayanan dialisis saat ini belum terpadu. Belum ada pencerahan rohani dan kewajiban pencabutan/pemotongan alat dialisis bagi pasien muslim ketika sudah meninggal di rumah. Kajian ini merekomendasikan perlu melakukan perubahan Permenkes No. 812 tahun 2010 pasal 15 ayat 1 dan 2, seiring dengan upaya yang bisa dilakukan oleh Kementerian Kesehatan, Dinas Kesehatan dan Rumah Sakit dalam memperkuat sistem kesehatan dan mutu pelayanan bagi pasien dialisis. \\nKata kunci: Kebijakan Kesehatan, Pelayanan Dialisis, Penyakit Gagal Ginjal \\nAbstract \\nImplementation of Permenkes No. 812 of 2010 concerning the implementation of dialysis services in health facilities in Indonesia causing problems for people with cordic kidney failure. This study uses qualitative descriptive methods, data collection techniques through literature reviews in a number of articles, research reports, and journals and discussions / consultations through online. The data was obtained in the analysis with miles hubermans theory. Conducted from December 2020 to March 2021. The results concluded that the implementation of Permenkes No. 812/2010 on The Implementation of Dialysis Services in Health Care Facilities has not been optimal. The availability of facilities and infrastructure, human resources, tools, machinery, dialysis fluids, and drugs has not been evenly divided throughout Indonesia. Many patients do not get hemodialysis therapy (HD) services twice a week. Dialysis patients continue to increase, about 20 thousand patients have not received access to treatment, the selection of types of hemodialysis therapy HD and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) implemented according to the recommendations of doctors. Patients have not received enough HD doses drugs and time due to various obstacles. Hospitals /Clinics have not made home visits in the framework of education and monitoring, dialysis patients have the potential to experience complications / infections / deaths (droup out). Monev has not run optimally, HD financing is more expensive than CAPD burdening the country’s finances, dialysis training is still minimal in hospitals / clinics. The current dialysis service policy is not yet integrated. There has been no spiritual revocation and obligation to revocation/cut dialysis equipment for Muslim patients when they have died at home. This study of authors recommends policy solutions that need changes to Permenkes No. 812 of 2010 article 15 paragraphs 1 and 2. And concrete efforts that can be done by the Ministry of Health, Hospitals, and Health Services. \\nKeywords: Health Policy, Dialysis Services, Kidney Failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesehatan\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesehatan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22435/jpppk.v0i0.4325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pelayanan Kesehatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22435/jpppk.v0i0.4325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2010年第812日《卫生条例》的摘要,印尼卫生保健机构(yankes)设立透析服务,给慢性肾衰竭患者带来了问题。该研究采用一种定性的描述性方法,一种通过文献回顾、研究报告、期刊和在线讨论/咨询的数据收集技术。收集的数据是通过迈尔斯和胡伯曼理论分析的。这项研究始于2020年12月2021年3月。结果表明,2010年第812/ 12条关于在yankes (fasyankes)设施进行透析服务的建议并不是最理想的。资源和基础设施、人力资源、工具、机器、流动液体和药物的可用性在印尼各地没有得到平等的分配。许多患者每周至少接受两次血液透析治疗。透析病人的数量继续增加,大约有2万名患者没有获得治疗方法、高清和持续淀粉样治疗(CAPD)的选择。由于各种障碍,病人没有得到足够的药物剂量和高清时间。医院/诊所不进行教育和监测,透析患者可能出现并发症/感染/死亡(退学)。莫耶夫还没有找到最佳的解决方案,HD的融资比CAPD更昂贵,负担国家财政,医院/诊所的透析训练更少。透析服务政策目前还不是综合的。穆斯林患者在家中去世时,精神上的启迪和切断透析工具的义务仍然存在。本研究建议,2010年第812条第15条和第2条,以及卫生部、卫生和医院为加强透析患者的卫生系统和服务质量所作的努力,将需要改变812条条目。关键词:卫生政策、透析服务、肾衰竭衰竭实施《2010年护理第812号》。这项研究的目的是通过阅读报告、研究报告、日记和通过在线讨论的意见来审查技术。这些数据是由迈尔斯·胡伯曼理论进行的分析分析出来的。2020年至2021年3月。2010年第812/ 11条关于医疗保健服务的推荐并没有被证明是最佳的。事实和基础设施、人力资源、工具、机械、透析、河流和毒品的可行性并没有被证明是印尼的罪魁祸首。许多病人接受血液透析治疗并不是一周两次的服务。免疫病人继续增加,大约20名患者没有接受治疗,血液透析治疗HD和持续淀粉样蛋白的选择性实现应经医生推荐。病人没有收到足够的毒品剂量和不同剂量的强迫症。临终关怀/诊所没有在教育和监督的框架内办理家庭服务,透析病人有可能体验到值得思考/死亡的过程。Monev并没有进行最佳运行,HD finance比CAPD消耗乡村资金更贵,他的透支培训在医院/诊所仍然是最低水平。当前透析政策尚未整合。在穆斯林家庭死亡时,没有对穆斯林病人进行精神上的改造和限制。这个研究是权威的要求政策解决方案,需要改变2010年第812条第15条第1和第2段。以及由卫生、收容所和卫生服务部门提供的混凝土服务。Keywords:卫生政策,透析服务,ki肾福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementasi Permenkes Nomor 812 Tahun 2010 tentang Tata Laksana Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Hemodialisis di Indonesia
Abstrak Implementasi Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan (Permenkes) RI No. 812 tahun 2010 tentang penyelenggaraan pelayanan dialisis pada fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan (yankes) di Indonesia menimbulkan masalah bagi penderita gagal ginjal kronis. Kajian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif, teknik pengumpulan data melalui tinjauan pustaka pada sejumlah artikel, laporan penelitian, dan jurnal serta diskusi/konsultasi melalui daring. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan teori Miles & Hubermans. Kajian dilakukan dari bulan Desember 2020 s.d. Maret 2021. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa implementasi Permenkes No. 812/2010 tentang penyelenggaraan pelayanan dialisis pada fasilitas yankes (fasyankes) belum optimal. Ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana, sumber daya manusia (SDM), alat, mesin, cairan dialisat, dan obat belum terbagi merata di seluruh Indonesia. Banyak pasien belum mendapatkan pelayanan hemodialisis (HD) 2 kali seminggu. Jumlah pasien dialisis terus meningkat, sekitar 20 ribu pasien belum mendapatkan akses pengobatan, pemilihan jenis terapi HD dan continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) yang dilaksanakan sesuai rekomendasi dokter. Pasien belum mendapat dosis obat dan waktu HD yang cukup karena berbagai kendala. RS/Klinik belum melakukan kunjungan rumah dalam rangka edukasi dan pemantauan, pasien dialisis berpotensi mengalami komplikasi/infeksi/kematian (drop out). Monev belum berjalan optimal, pembiayaan HD lebih mahal dari CAPD membebani keuangan negara, pelatihan dialisis masih minim di RS/Klinik. Kebijakan pelayanan dialisis saat ini belum terpadu. Belum ada pencerahan rohani dan kewajiban pencabutan/pemotongan alat dialisis bagi pasien muslim ketika sudah meninggal di rumah. Kajian ini merekomendasikan perlu melakukan perubahan Permenkes No. 812 tahun 2010 pasal 15 ayat 1 dan 2, seiring dengan upaya yang bisa dilakukan oleh Kementerian Kesehatan, Dinas Kesehatan dan Rumah Sakit dalam memperkuat sistem kesehatan dan mutu pelayanan bagi pasien dialisis. Kata kunci: Kebijakan Kesehatan, Pelayanan Dialisis, Penyakit Gagal Ginjal Abstract Implementation of Permenkes No. 812 of 2010 concerning the implementation of dialysis services in health facilities in Indonesia causing problems for people with cordic kidney failure. This study uses qualitative descriptive methods, data collection techniques through literature reviews in a number of articles, research reports, and journals and discussions / consultations through online. The data was obtained in the analysis with miles hubermans theory. Conducted from December 2020 to March 2021. The results concluded that the implementation of Permenkes No. 812/2010 on The Implementation of Dialysis Services in Health Care Facilities has not been optimal. The availability of facilities and infrastructure, human resources, tools, machinery, dialysis fluids, and drugs has not been evenly divided throughout Indonesia. Many patients do not get hemodialysis therapy (HD) services twice a week. Dialysis patients continue to increase, about 20 thousand patients have not received access to treatment, the selection of types of hemodialysis therapy HD and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) implemented according to the recommendations of doctors. Patients have not received enough HD doses drugs and time due to various obstacles. Hospitals /Clinics have not made home visits in the framework of education and monitoring, dialysis patients have the potential to experience complications / infections / deaths (droup out). Monev has not run optimally, HD financing is more expensive than CAPD burdening the country’s finances, dialysis training is still minimal in hospitals / clinics. The current dialysis service policy is not yet integrated. There has been no spiritual revocation and obligation to revocation/cut dialysis equipment for Muslim patients when they have died at home. This study of authors recommends policy solutions that need changes to Permenkes No. 812 of 2010 article 15 paragraphs 1 and 2. And concrete efforts that can be done by the Ministry of Health, Hospitals, and Health Services. Keywords: Health Policy, Dialysis Services, Kidney Failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Status Vaksinasi BCG (Bacille Calmette-Guérin) dan Angka Kejadian Tuberkulosis Paru pada Anak di Indonesia Kepuasan Orangtua Pasien Terhadap Pelayanan di Bangsal Anak Sebagai Salah Satu Indikator Keberhasilan Pelayanan RSUP Sanglah di Denpasar Faktor Risiko COVID-19 sebagai Dasar Pencegahan dan Pengendalian Infeksi Gambaran Status Kesehatan Gigi dan Mulut pada Masyarakat di Provinsi DI Yogyakarta Evaluasi Faktor-faktor Pengelolaan Vaksin di Puskesmas dan Praktek Mandiri Bidan di Kabupaten Lampung Timur
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1