PEMFC/UC电动汽车能量管理策略分析

O. Béthoux, G. Remy, J. Riera, M. Serra, T. Azib
{"title":"PEMFC/UC电动汽车能量管理策略分析","authors":"O. Béthoux, G. Remy, J. Riera, M. Serra, T. Azib","doi":"10.1109/VPPC.2012.6422778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, two energy management strategies considering the hydrogen consumption of hybrid power sources using a PEM Fuel Cell (FC) and Ultracapacitors (UC) are described and compared. First, the Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) architecture and the associated models with their control strategies are described. The two energy management strategies are evaluated based on the Energetic Macroscopic Representation (EMR). The comparison focuses on the global efficiency of the power sources energy management. In particular, a proposed strategy is to manage the UC State-Of-Charge while stabilizing the FC around its maximal efficiency point. Finally, some simulations on a Fuel Cell / Ultracapacitors HEV show the differences between the compared control strategies.","PeriodicalId":341659,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyses of energy management strategies for a PEMFC/UC electric vehicle\",\"authors\":\"O. Béthoux, G. Remy, J. Riera, M. Serra, T. Azib\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VPPC.2012.6422778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, two energy management strategies considering the hydrogen consumption of hybrid power sources using a PEM Fuel Cell (FC) and Ultracapacitors (UC) are described and compared. First, the Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) architecture and the associated models with their control strategies are described. The two energy management strategies are evaluated based on the Energetic Macroscopic Representation (EMR). The comparison focuses on the global efficiency of the power sources energy management. In particular, a proposed strategy is to manage the UC State-Of-Charge while stabilizing the FC around its maximal efficiency point. Finally, some simulations on a Fuel Cell / Ultracapacitors HEV show the differences between the compared control strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference\",\"volume\":\"156 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2012.6422778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2012.6422778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文介绍并比较了PEM燃料电池(FC)和超级电容器(UC)混合电源的两种能量管理策略。首先,介绍了混合动力汽车(HEV)的体系结构、相关模型及其控制策略。基于能量宏观表征(EMR)对两种能量管理策略进行了评价。比较的重点是电源能源管理的整体效率。具体而言,提出的策略是在最大效率点附近稳定FC的同时管理UC的充电状态。最后,对一种燃料电池/超级电容器混合动力汽车进行了仿真,验证了两种控制策略之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyses of energy management strategies for a PEMFC/UC electric vehicle
In this paper, two energy management strategies considering the hydrogen consumption of hybrid power sources using a PEM Fuel Cell (FC) and Ultracapacitors (UC) are described and compared. First, the Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) architecture and the associated models with their control strategies are described. The two energy management strategies are evaluated based on the Energetic Macroscopic Representation (EMR). The comparison focuses on the global efficiency of the power sources energy management. In particular, a proposed strategy is to manage the UC State-Of-Charge while stabilizing the FC around its maximal efficiency point. Finally, some simulations on a Fuel Cell / Ultracapacitors HEV show the differences between the compared control strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Datasheet-based modeling of Li-Ion batteries The proposal of wheel slip control method with peak point search and the test result Battery duty profile of a heavy-duty trolleybus The evaluation of WAVE communication for seamless services under V2I environment Energetic Macroscopic Representation and inversion-based control of the traction system of a hybrid locomotive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1