高等教育师资关注混合环境下的教学:对中国民办高等教育师资开发商和师资的启示

Nahai Gu, L. Donovan, Tim D. Green, S. Ma, D. Currie
{"title":"高等教育师资关注混合环境下的教学:对中国民办高等教育师资开发商和师资的启示","authors":"Nahai Gu, L. Donovan, Tim D. Green, S. Ma, D. Currie","doi":"10.30935/ijpdll/12638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through a lens of cross-cultural collaboration and change theory, this study explored the concerns of higher education faculty from 11 private institutions in Shanghai, China who, with little to no training, were asked to develop and teach a hybrid course. Faculty taught a range of subjects. Using the stages of concern dimension of the concerns-based adoption model of change, results showed faculty were primarily concerned with learning more about hybrid teaching and learning. The greatest disparity between concerns of faculty groups (i.e., experience, content taught) was related to online teaching experience. It is recommended that prior to engaging higher education faculty in faculty development, consideration must be given to cultural norms and individual differences. Facilitators must get to know participants on a professional level and cultural level. The study implications extend to faculty development facilitators and to the way in which relationships are viewed in Chinese higher education.","PeriodicalId":133780,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher education faculty concerns teaching in a hybrid environment: Implications for Chinese private higher education faculty developers and faculty\",\"authors\":\"Nahai Gu, L. Donovan, Tim D. Green, S. Ma, D. Currie\",\"doi\":\"10.30935/ijpdll/12638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through a lens of cross-cultural collaboration and change theory, this study explored the concerns of higher education faculty from 11 private institutions in Shanghai, China who, with little to no training, were asked to develop and teach a hybrid course. Faculty taught a range of subjects. Using the stages of concern dimension of the concerns-based adoption model of change, results showed faculty were primarily concerned with learning more about hybrid teaching and learning. The greatest disparity between concerns of faculty groups (i.e., experience, content taught) was related to online teaching experience. It is recommended that prior to engaging higher education faculty in faculty development, consideration must be given to cultural norms and individual differences. Facilitators must get to know participants on a professional level and cultural level. The study implications extend to faculty development facilitators and to the way in which relationships are viewed in Chinese higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":133780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/12638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/12638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过跨文化合作和变革理论的视角,本研究探讨了来自中国上海11所私立院校的高等教育教师所关注的问题,他们几乎没有接受过培训,被要求开发和教授一门混合课程。教师教授一系列的课程。运用基于关注的变革采用模型的关注阶段维度,结果显示教师主要关注的是学习更多的混合式教与学。教师群体关注的最大差异(即经验、教学内容)与在线教学经验有关。建议在让高等教育教师参与教师发展之前,必须考虑文化规范和个体差异。主持人必须从专业层面和文化层面了解参与者。这项研究的意义延伸到教师发展促进者和中国高等教育中看待关系的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Higher education faculty concerns teaching in a hybrid environment: Implications for Chinese private higher education faculty developers and faculty
Through a lens of cross-cultural collaboration and change theory, this study explored the concerns of higher education faculty from 11 private institutions in Shanghai, China who, with little to no training, were asked to develop and teach a hybrid course. Faculty taught a range of subjects. Using the stages of concern dimension of the concerns-based adoption model of change, results showed faculty were primarily concerned with learning more about hybrid teaching and learning. The greatest disparity between concerns of faculty groups (i.e., experience, content taught) was related to online teaching experience. It is recommended that prior to engaging higher education faculty in faculty development, consideration must be given to cultural norms and individual differences. Facilitators must get to know participants on a professional level and cultural level. The study implications extend to faculty development facilitators and to the way in which relationships are viewed in Chinese higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overview of the perceived Influence of Insecurity on Academic Performance in front lines Local Government Secondary Schools in Niger State, Nigeria Addressing student diversity to improve mathematics achievement through differentiated instruction Who benefits and when? Understanding differential treatment effects of an online professional development program Exploring the role of instructional leaders in promoting agency in teachers’ professional learning Research on teacher education and implications for improving the quality of teacher education in Cambodia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1